• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

firefox 4 beta 7 released

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
pcslookout said:
Yep. I am perfectly happy with Firefox 3.6 though and may be out of norm for saying this but I prefer Firefox 3.6 at the moment over Firefox 4. Speed is still important just not a top priority. I rather have more features than speed anyday.
Click to expand...


That's where I'm at with it. FF4 doesn't really add much for me. I use it, and 3.6 alternately as my daily driver, but I really prefer 3.6, and sometimes I have to use 3.6 due to the addons.
 
lxskllr said:
That's where I'm at with it. FF4 doesn't really add much for me. I use it, and 3.6 alternately as my daily driver, but I really prefer 3.6, and sometimes I have to use 3.6 due to the addons.
Click to expand...

Yeah hopefully by the time Firefox 4 final is out most addons and greasemonkey scripts, if not all but that is a dream that is not going to happen, work. Unfortunately some take longer than others to get updated. I like the way Opera is making a stand with add-ons where they will work on any version supposedly. Granted just like Google Chrome Opera's add-on support is limited compared to Firefox as well. Not with the number of add-on I am not talking about but in what you can do. You can customize just about anything in Firefox. Not so in Google Chrome or Opera. However Opera add-ons are more open than Chrome but not sure by how much. Don't think any browser will ever have such open add-ons as Firefox does. Which can be a good thing and a bad thing. Depending on how you look at it.

There one add-on I still use that basically only had support only up to Firefox 2 but they did create a version for Firefox 3 so I was able to just skid by with that one! I know there won't be a version for 4 though but that is not a problem. Thankfully that is one the Firefox add-ons that will still work with Firefox 4 even though there will be a version for it. Not the case with all my add-ons though but thankfully those are still in development so it shouldn't be a problem.
 
for those having font trouble try this --

Bluefang wrote:
Spacepoint wrote:However firefox 4 uses something else to render the fonts by default so it isn't catched by GDIPP, and they now look like crap again/default.
​
Try disabling DirectWrite. Set gfx.font_rendering.directwrite.enabled to false.

​

DirectWrite is windows only.
eusa_whistle.gif


Instead, try changing the font Firefox uses in "Tools (Edit) -> Preferences -> Content -> Fonts and Colors -> Advanced" to the one Chrome/Safari/(Insert browser here) uses.

You can use google to find out how to tell what fonts they are using.

You could also try fiddling with the option: gfx.font_rendering.harfbuzz.level in about:config.
 
TAandy said:
think i'll get rid of it.
noticed in task manager it was using a crap load of memory. over 100mb.
quit it, restarted and watched.
just google home page open. and the memory used count just went up and up and up!

edit:
and it wasn't particularly fast
Click to expand...
speed wise i think it more than likely is you and not firefox judging by other reports on the web which are saying it is about equal to chrome and opera. i just checked my memory usage with 6 tabs open and it is 467,888
 
hclarkjr said:
speed wise i think it more than likely is you and not firefox judging by other reports on the web which are saying it is about equal to chrome and opera. i just checked my memory usage with 6 tabs open and it is 467,888
Click to expand...

have to disagree. i'm afraid.
system was very slow and jerky.
using ff3 now, and ff is using 78 mb and everything is a whole lot more responsive.
just one of those things i guess
 
ok.
done that.
advanced is definitely now checked.
memory usage 95mb
but will have to report later as to how performance goes.
too early to say 🙂
 
TAandy said:
think i'll get rid of it.
noticed in task manager it was using a crap load of memory. over 100mb.
quit it, restarted and watched.
just google home page open. and the memory used count just went up and up and up!

edit:
and it wasn't particularly fast
Click to expand...

Why does to matter how much memory your browser uses as long as it works fine ? Internet Explorer and Chrome even uses more memory.

Anyway Firefox 4 uses so much memory part because of a tab candy and such. I don't really see a problem. How much ram do you have ?
 
AHHH...it's getting worse...Flash keeps crashing and some websites don't work correctly. A few builds ago everything was working well.
 
13Gigatons said:
AHHH...it's getting worse...Flash keeps crashing and some websites don't work correctly. A few builds ago everything was working well.
Click to expand...

Well it is a beta after all. I only use beta software as my primary software from a select few programmers and that is it. Otherwise I only look to see what it is new and report bugs.
 
hclarkjr said:
funny, i go to lots of sites that have flash and have 0 problems. did you do clean install of the new beta or upgrade?
Click to expand...

Clean install and new profile. The minefield builds from a week ago were working fine and then the last few nightly's have become buggy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top