Shadow Conception
Golden Member
This is BS, the rest of us get ripped off with Comcast's 6mbps/384kbps at massively higher prices.
C'mon FIOS, implement yourselves universally!
C'mon FIOS, implement yourselves universally!
Originally posted by: RadiclDreamer
Verizon does this while others are bitching and moaning saying we need to implement caps or teh intarwebs will asplode!
Originally posted by: mugs
Wow. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to offer 20/20 since it doesn't match the usage pattern of most legitimate users. Unless optical networks differ from wired networks and increasing the upload speed doesn't cost them on the download side.
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: ropeadope
Is it in Tucson yet?...I don't really know how it works.
$65 a month is only $15 more than what I'm paying for Cox right now.
I would imagine that it'd be deployed in Phoenix before Tuscon, being the larger city with more potential customers.
I'd drop Cox Cable in about 5 seconds if they offered Verizon FIOS service here. Its possible to get Qwest Fiber a few blocks away though.
Verizon's 16 state deployment is pretty sad, they should be expanding a lot faster than what they are. A few years ago, when I first looked into FIOS, they were in the same 16 states they are today.
Quit complaining. My "DSL" is 10/1Mbps (down/up) but I only get an effective 125/60Kbps :|Originally posted by: Anubis
id be happy with 1/2 that, hell id be happy if i could get 1 up and not thsi shitty 512k up that TWC gives me
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: randomlinh
it just irks me because I live in the initial roll out county.. and will probably be one of the last to ever get it at this rate.
I was talking with the tech who set me up and asked why my particular town was 2 years behind neighboring towns (same county). He stated that sometimes Verizon faces jurisdiction problems (vs. cable companies, etc.) and have to await a court decision. This was the case for Long Island towns and each had to provide approval. He added that in NJ, it was 1 approval for the entire state, so it was much easier. It may be the case that your towns are doing the same thing to them.
Originally posted by: mugs
Wow. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to offer 20/20 since it doesn't match the usage pattern of most legitimate users. Unless optical networks differ from wired networks and increasing the upload speed doesn't cost them on the download side.
Originally posted by: theplaidfad
I'm getting 15 down and 2 up with optimum online cable in NJ for 29.95 a month, then 40 a month after my first year.
I could get their "boost" service for 65 a month which is 30 down and 5 up, then again I could also get Fios for that much.
I'll stick with what I have 😉
Originally posted by: ViRGE
I'd assume this is to screw with Comcast. Comcast's mid-tier in FIOS areas was recently made 16/2 (up from 8/768), this puts them ahead of Comcast again. It also puts them ahead of Comcast's low-end (although standard) 6/1 tier.
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: mugs
Wow. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to offer 20/20 since it doesn't match the usage pattern of most legitimate users. Unless optical networks differ from wired networks and increasing the upload speed doesn't cost them on the download side.
shhhhhh!
I've been waiting for a viable home hosting option for 10 years. Now if they just bring it to my town, all will be well.
Originally posted by: oogabooga
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: mugs
Wow. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to offer 20/20 since it doesn't match the usage pattern of most legitimate users. Unless optical networks differ from wired networks and increasing the upload speed doesn't cost them on the download side.
shhhhhh!
I've been waiting for a viable home hosting option for 10 years. Now if they just bring it to my town, all will be well.
This has sadly been my view on FIOS for awhile 😛
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: randomlinh
it just irks me because I live in the initial roll out county.. and will probably be one of the last to ever get it at this rate.
I was talking with the tech who set me up and asked why my particular town was 2 years behind neighboring towns (same county). He stated that sometimes Verizon faces jurisdiction problems (vs. cable companies, etc.) and have to await a court decision. This was the case for Long Island towns and each had to provide approval. He added that in NJ, it was 1 approval for the entire state, so it was much easier. It may be the case that your towns are doing the same thing to them.
They are building it out like crazy all around me. I check the construction notifications each month praying to see my street finally show up. Driving me nucking futs to drive by the trucks doing the work in some of the neighborhoods I pass through on the way to work. So close yet so far.
In FIOS areas Comcast's mid-tier plan is called Blast. It's 16/2 sustained, with short PowerBoost bursts of up to 30Mbps down.Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: ViRGE
I'd assume this is to screw with Comcast. Comcast's mid-tier in FIOS areas was recently made 16/2 (up from 8/768), this puts them ahead of Comcast again. It also puts them ahead of Comcast's low-end (although standard) 6/1 tier.
I'm pretty sure the 16/2 is only burst speeds, though. After any kind of sustained downloading or uploading, speeds drop back to the usual speeds. It's good for downloading a quick podcast or uploading a simple document to an email, but beyond that speeds have not changed.
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
I can't imagine the download goodness with 20/20 connection.
Originally posted by: mugs
Wow. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to offer 20/20 since it doesn't match the usage pattern of most legitimate users. Unless optical networks differ from wired networks and increasing the upload speed doesn't cost them on the download side.
Originally posted by: mugs
Wow. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to offer 20/20 since it doesn't match the usage pattern of most legitimate users. Unless optical networks differ from wired networks and increasing the upload speed doesn't cost them on the download side.
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: ropeadope
Is it in Tucson yet?...I don't really know how it works.
$65 a month is only $15 more than what I'm paying for Cox right now.
I would imagine that it'd be deployed in Phoenix before Tuscon, being the larger city with more potential customers.
I'd drop Cox Cable in about 5 seconds if they offered Verizon FIOS service here. Its possible to get Qwest Fiber a few blocks away though.
Verizon's 16 state deployment is pretty sad, they should be expanding a lot faster than what they are. A few years ago, when I first looked into FIOS, they were in the same 16 states they are today.