Find me a nice picture to print an 8x10 with

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
Well, for a decent 8x10 when viewed from a distance, you would need about 150 dpi, or a photo from a 1.5 MP camera.

For an 8x10 that resembles a mid-grade film print, you would need about 300 dpi, or 7 MP.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Well, for a decent 8x10 when viewed from a distance, you would need about 150 dpi, or a photo from a 1.5 MP camera.

For an 8x10 that resembles a mid-grade film print, you would need about 300 dpi, or 7 MP.

so to print a photo qiality 20x30 i need a 50mp camera?

i think not
 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Well, for a decent 8x10 when viewed from a distance, you would need about 150 dpi, or a photo from a 1.5 MP camera.

For an 8x10 that resembles a mid-grade film print, you would need about 300 dpi, or 7 MP.

so to print a photo qiality 20x30 i need a 50mp camera?

i think not

I think so.. if you want a print of equivalent quality...
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Well, for a decent 8x10 when viewed from a distance, you would need about 150 dpi, or a photo from a 1.5 MP camera.

For an 8x10 that resembles a mid-grade film print, you would need about 300 dpi, or 7 MP.

so to print a photo qiality 20x30 i need a 50mp camera?

i think not

I think so.. if you want a print of equivalent quality...

i happen to dissagree with you, ive done B&W prints up to 16x20 from 35mm film and ive printed 16x20 from a 6mp digital camera, the digital prints look better, ive printed to 32x44 from a 6mp digital and i would wager money you couldent tell the diff between it and a 35mm film enlargement of that size

actually getting a 35mm print that large woudl be extreamly hard
 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
I never said anything about 35mm film... I'm talking about professional film stock, not consumer grade. 35mm is crap, for the most part. Comparing digital to 35mm doesn't say much.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: daniel1113
I never said anything about 35mm film... I'm talking about professional film stock, not consumer grade. 35mm is crap, for the most part. Comparing digital to 35mm doesn't say much.

you mean slide film? 35mm slide film woudl have issues at 20x30 or bigger as well

you cant compair digital to medium and large format because the digital sensor is the size of a 35mm film negative
 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
So what? That doesn't change the fact that in order to produce an 8x10 digital print indistinguishable from a film print, you would need approximately a 7MP camera. The jump from 4 to 7 MP is much less than the jump from a 1 to 4 MP camera, hence the quality increase would seem minimal, but it would be noticable.
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Well, for a decent 8x10 when viewed from a distance, you would need about 150 dpi, or a photo from a 1.5 MP camera.

For an 8x10 that resembles a mid-grade film print, you would need about 300 dpi, or 7 MP.

so to print a photo qiality 20x30 i need a 50mp camera?

i think not


If you want it printed at 20x30 with no pixelation, blurriness, and sharp as it would be with film, then yeah. there IS a noticable difference between 150 dpi and 300 dpi.