Final Voyage for USS Enterprise

tboo

Diamond Member
Jun 25, 2000
7,626
1
81
http://wtkr.com/2013/06/18/uss-enterprise-to-go-on-final-voyage-for-inactivation/

e3.jpg

e2.jpg
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
I'm surprised they're scrapping such a historic ship.

Especially for a "nucuweer wessel", radiation contamination is probably a likely cause. A lot of historic ships have turned into museums and whatnot, but continuous exposure to radiation has a tendency to break down even the toughest of materials, making cleanup and upkeep of such a beast rather expensive in order to make her safe to the general public for years to come.
 

PlanetJosh

Golden Member
May 6, 2013
1,814
143
106
I thought it was about the tv show from the title. But good service from the ship over the decades. Maybe it even saved my life by launching cruise missiles that disrupted a terrorist plot that may have killed me had it not been thwarted.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,908
4,940
136
What is an even greater crying shame is that it's predecessor was scrapped. There wasn't any nuclear leakage from that thing.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
"from the cuban missle crisis in august 1962..."

o_O

how much was spent on a 2-year overhaul 2 years before decommissioning?
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,585
3,796
126
Hmmm - I was all ready to be indignant that we had a George HW Bush in the navy but not an Enterprise but it looks like there might be a new one commissioned: CVN-80
 

stevty2889

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2003
7,036
8
81
How does this ship stack up against the nimitz class ones?

It's about 100 feet longer, but more narrow. Had a higher top speed than the Nimitz class. 8 smaller reactors vs 2 larger reactors, but didn't run all reactors at once. Hull was more curved as well, so not quite as stable as the Nimitz(would start rocking in rough waters, and had to chain down the aircraft).

I was on the Big E in 1996, during the last cruise of the A-6 Intruder.
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
It's about 100 feet longer, but more narrow. Had a higher top speed than the Nimitz class. 8 smaller reactors vs 2 larger reactors, but didn't run all reactors at once. Hull was more curved as well, so not quite as stable as the Nimitz(would start rocking in rough waters, and had to chain down the aircraft).

I was on the Big E in 1996, during the last cruise of the A-6 Intruder.

Cool, ive been googling and damn the USA loves its carriers... didnt realize there was a whole line of supercarriers predating the nimitz. Those old forrestal and kitty hawks look pretty formidable.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,585
3,796
126
Cool, ive been googling and damn the USA loves its carriers... didnt realize there was a whole line of supercarriers predating the nimitz. Those old forrestal and kitty hawks look pretty formidable.

Don't forget the Gerald R Ford class of new carriers
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,941
3,922
136
Cool, ive been googling and damn the USA loves its carriers... didnt realize there was a whole line of supercarriers predating the nimitz. Those old forrestal and kitty hawks look pretty formidable.

That's why the US Navy could wipe out any other navy in the world in a blink. As we learned in WWII, it's all about the air power. Russia and China would at least pose a challenge, but the outcome wouldn't be in doubt.
 

spacejamz

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
10,981
1,701
126
That's why the US Navy could wipe out any other navy in the world in a blink. As we learned in WWII, it's all about the air power. Russia and China would at least pose a challenge, but the outcome wouldn't be in doubt.

Still curious about a Red Storm Rising (Clancy) scenario where hundreds of anti ship missiles were launch against a carrier battle group to see if Aegis/Phalanx (are these still the current defense systems or is there something newer yet?) would be able to handle it.