• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Final Fantasy 2 and 3 8-Bit Nintendo Japenese Versions

G

Glavinsolo

Platinum Member
I just finished Final Fantasy 1 in my goal to play all the old final fantasies. I obviously started with my dusty old Final Fantasy 1 in my 8-bit nintendo. It was fun, I didn't remember half of it, couldn't believe that airships were in the first one but they are.

Now I completed this maybe 2 days ago. And I started playing Super Nintendo's Final Fantasy II (US Version)

Reading through walkthroughs online I came to the astonishing fact that I am in fact not playing FFII but FFIV!

So I went searching and found FFII and FFIII japanese versions. Has anyone played through these and are they any revealing to storylines or are they the least favorite of the series?

Debating whether its worth the time.
 
The storylines are not related to any of the other Final Fantasy games. None of the regular series of games are really related to each other except X and X-2.* You don't have to play the original Japanese NES versions of II and III, you can play III on the DS and II on the PSP or GBA.


* Before anyone jumps down my throat, I'm referring to the regular series of JRPGs, not the non-JRPGs like Dirge of Cerberus. @ OP - in short, any Final Fantasy games that have related plots also have the same numbered title.
 
Originally posted by: mugs
The storylines are not related to any of the other Final Fantasy games. None of the regular series of games are really related to each other except X and X-2.* You don't have to play the original Japanese NES versions of II and III, you can play III on the DS and II on the PSP or GBA.


* Before anyone jumps down my throat, I'm referring to the regular series of JRPGs, not the non-JRPGs like Dirge of Cerberus. @ OP - in short, any Final Fantasy games that have related plots also have the same numbered title.
Click to expand...

Ok, thanks for the clarification. In my defense I have only played fully through US versions of 1, 2, 3 and mystic quest. FFVII I just tried to get up and running on vista and it just wasn't having it. I have yet to try FFVIII. I own both of these but never got around to finishing them while going to college.

Oh and btw it sounds like you played the japenese 2 and 3. Are they any good?
 
Originally posted by: nobody special
Originally posted by: mugs
I've played III, but not II. III is worth playing.
Click to expand...

So is the 3 you are talking about the same 3 that is on the DS? Their numbering gets confusing
Click to expand...

Yes, the III that is on the DS.

Yes, the numbering is confusing... II/IV and III/VI on the SNES were the only ones that were ever numbered differently in the US. Anything released starting with VII, including re-releases of old games, has used the correct numbers from the Japanese series. Final Fantasy "II" and "III" were re-released on the Playstation and Gameboy Advance as IV and VI, etc.
 
Don't know about the 8bit version but the PSP version of old school FF2 sucks. Its too easy and there's no captivating story ala US' SNES FFII/III.
 
Originally posted by: beat mania
Don't know about the 8bit version but the PSP version of old school FF2 sucks. Its too easy and there's no captivating story ala US' SNES FFII/III.
Click to expand...
The level system is also "interesting". But, to be fair, I think the story is far better than the FF1 story, which is what it should be compared to (given the games' ages). I'm about halfway through the PSP version right now, and it's pretty good, IMHO.

As for Crystal Chronicles (Gamecube): it's good if you've got friends, GBAs, GC-to-GBA link cables, and regular playing dates. It's a bit meh otherwise. I've read that Ring of Fates on the DS is better, but I haven't played it yet.
 
Sometimes the FF games can take place in the same world, but they usually don't have the same characters. Like FFXII and FFT both take place in Ivalice.
 
lol, too bad you dont have a psp you could have just gotten final fantasy 1/2 with nice updated graphics but same story and monsters. I remember playing final fantasy 1 not even knowing that is what an rpg was but i loved it. When I was 17 or so I loaded up the final fantasy 1 card from when I was 9 and I was at the end at level 99 with every guy lol, ah youth.
 
Squaresoft has milked the FF games endlessly, so they are available on quite a few systems.

Here are the systems you can find Final Fantasy I, II and III on (using Japanese naming):

Final Fantasy I:

NES
Playstation (called "Final Fantasy Origins")
Gameboy Advance ("Final Fantasy Origins")
Sony PSP ("Final Fantasy I")

Final Fantasy II

NES (Japan only)
Playstation (called "Final Fantasy Origins")
Gameboy Advance ("Final Fantasy Origins")
Sony PSP ("Final Fantasy II")

Final Fantasy III

NES (Japan only)
Nintendo DS ("Final Fantasy III")

-----

Now, the difinitive versions of the games are basically any of the Final Fantasy I or II remakes (Origins has improved graphics, Final Fantasy I and II for PSP has even more improved graphics than Origins, though marginally).

Final Fantasy III for the DS is basically a total remake of FF3 for the NES, using a 3d engine, etc. They cleaned up the storyline which was extremely vague (there are partially translated versions out there, which show how spotty the storyline was originally).

---------


Just a heads up too, if any of you are fans of the SNES Final Fantasy II game (now called Final Fantasy IV, due to this being the Japanese title), there is a 3d remake coming out on the Nintendo DS sometime this year (it was released last December in Japan) and it looks awesome!

 
Originally posted by: jiffylube1024
Squaresoft has milked the FF games endlessly, so they are available on quite a few systems.

Here are the systems you can find Final Fantasy I, II and III on (using Japanese naming):

Final Fantasy I:

NES
Playstation (called "Final Fantasy Origins")
Gameboy Advance ("Final Fantasy Origins")
Sony PSP ("Final Fantasy I")

Final Fantasy II

NES (Japan only)
Playstation (called "Final Fantasy Origins")
Gameboy Advance ("Final Fantasy Origins")
Sony PSP ("Final Fantasy II")

Final Fantasy III

NES (Japan only)
Nintendo DS ("Final Fantasy III")

-----

Now, the difinitive versions of the games are basically any of the Final Fantasy I or II remakes (Origins has improved graphics, Final Fantasy I and II for PSP has even more improved graphics than Origins, though marginally).

Final Fantasy III for the DS is basically a total remake of FF3 for the NES, using a 3d engine, etc. They cleaned up the storyline which was extremely vague (there are partially translated versions out there, which show how spotty the storyline was originally).

---------


Just a heads up too, if any of you are fans of the SNES Final Fantasy II game (now called Final Fantasy IV, due to this being the Japanese title), there is a 3d remake coming out on the Nintendo DS sometime this year (it was released last December in Japan) and it looks awesome!
Click to expand...
oh wow really that is awesome, most people like 4, it was the first one to add some decent optional content and decent story...hmmm now when 6 is ready for a 3d overhaul sign me up.
 
Originally posted by: nobody special
okay I see now. Are the FF:Crystal Chronicle games any good by chance?
Click to expand...

The one for Gamecube was fun, as long as you had four people with GBAs and link cables.
 
The one for Gamecube was fun, as long as you had four people with GBAs and link cables.
Click to expand...
Thanks. I didn't realize that its better with the GBA ( or is it a requirement? ). I guess it wouldn't be worth picking it up used for $15 though without a GBA if that is the case.
 
Originally posted by: nobody special
The one for Gamecube was fun, as long as you had four people with GBAs and link cables.
Click to expand...
Thanks. I didn't realize that its better with the GBA ( or is it a requirement? ). I guess it wouldn't be worth picking it up used for $15 though without a GBA if that is the case.
Click to expand...
For multiplayer, each person needs their own GBA and link cable. For single-player, you only need a standard GC controller (and a GBA plus link cable, if you want the map).
 
Originally posted by: jiffylube1024
Squaresoft has milked the FF games endlessly, so they are available on quite a few systems.

Here are the systems you can find Final Fantasy I, II and III on (using Japanese naming):

Final Fantasy I:

NES
Playstation (called "Final Fantasy Origins")
Gameboy Advance (" I & II: Dawn of Souls")
Sony PSP ("Final Fantasy I")

Final Fantasy II

NES (Japan only)
Playstation (called "Final Fantasy Origins")
Gameboy Advance (" I & II: Dawn of Souls")
Sony PSP ("Final Fantasy II")

Final Fantasy III

NES (Japan only)
Nintendo DS ("Final Fantasy III")

-----

Now, the difinitive versions of the games are basically any of the Final Fantasy I or II remakes (Origins has improved graphics, Final Fantasy I and II for PSP has even more improved graphics than Origins, though marginally).

Final Fantasy III for the DS is basically a total remake of FF3 for the NES, using a 3d engine, etc. They cleaned up the storyline which was extremely vague (there are partially translated versions out there, which show how spotty the storyline was originally).

---------


Just a heads up too, if any of you are fans of the SNES Final Fantasy II game (now called Final Fantasy IV, due to this being the Japanese title), there is a 3d remake coming out on the Nintendo DS sometime this year (it was released last December in Japan) and it looks awesome!
Click to expand...

Slight correction.
 
man i wish i had the time to go back and play the old FFs again it sounds like a hell of a lot of fun and reminiscing.
 
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: nobody special
Originally posted by: mugs
I've played III, but not II. III is worth playing.
Click to expand...

So is the 3 you are talking about the same 3 that is on the DS? Their numbering gets confusing
Click to expand...

Yes, the III that is on the DS.

Yes, the numbering is confusing... II/IV and III/VI on the SNES were the only ones that were ever numbered differently in the US. Anything released starting with VII, including re-releases of old games, has used the correct numbers from the Japanese series. Final Fantasy "II" and "III" were re-released on the Playstation and Gameboy Advance as IV and VI, etc.
Click to expand...

Curse Square for not keeping the numbering consistent! We are subject to discussions like this from now until the end of time!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top