FIFA is F'ed

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
Linkified for the lazies http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/27/football/fifa-corruption-charges-justice-department/index.html

So after the US losses bid for the 2022 World Cup to Qatar, eyebrows were raised and heads will be rolling.

Everybody and their mothers know FIFA is a very corrupt organization, probably rivals the IOC, but one thing the FIFA Fs did not count on is how the US would respond. Just goes to show, you can screw with everybody else, just don't try to screw the US, they'll get you, eventually.

'Muricah, fuck yeah!
 
Last edited:

Markbnj

Elite Member <br>Moderator Emeritus
Moderator
Sep 16, 2005
15,682
14
81
www.markbetz.net
I don't know much about the governing body of pro soccer, but I'm always happy to see a scumbag corrupt official get taken down hard.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
did you see the photo of fifas boardroom?
shit looks like something from a bond movie

Boardroom1.jpg
 

PingviN

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2009
1,848
13
81
Don't worry, there are plenty of old slimeballs that will now take the stage.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
I don't know much about the governing body of pro soccer, but I'm always happy to see a scumbag corrupt official get taken down hard.

It has been suggested to their president (Sep Blatter) that he should never set foot on US soil, as the investigations have given the FBI enough cause to arrest him on site. This is the man currently running for reelection of FIFA after being in charge for 17 year. FIFA is easily the most corrupt organization in the world.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
Don't worry, there are plenty of old slimeballs that will now take the stage.

Yeah, but they're different old slimeballs. That's what American politics teaches us, when the current slimeballs do something too slimeball-ish you can get new slimeballs to replace them.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
None of this would have happened had activists not started pressuring sponsors over the gross human rights violations in Qatar.

I doubt any of these assholes will actually see jail time though.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
It has been suggested to their president (Sep Blatter) that he should never set foot on US soil, as the investigations have given the FBI enough cause to arrest him on site. This is the man currently running for reelection of FIFA after being in charge for 17 year. FIFA is easily the most corrupt organization in the world.
The Swiss are also running a parallel probe, probably seizing assets, extradition, etc...
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
None of this would have happened had activists not started pressuring sponsors over the gross human rights violations in Qatar.

I doubt any of these assholes will actually see jail time though.

Eh, apparently, the FBI has been investigating this for a long time. I believe I read somewhere, 22 year on going investigation.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
John Oliver did a great piece on FIFA. It's crazy how corrupt and how much money they have on hand.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlJEt2KU33I

They're probably the second most corrupt NGO in the world only after the International Olympic Committee. So much for being the "beautiful game."

If democratic countries were smart, they'd stop bidding on international sporting events. Let the dictators get screwed over.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
They're probably the second most corrupt NGO in the world only after the International Olympic Committee. So much for being the "beautiful game."

If democratic countries were smart, they'd stop bidding on international sporting events. Let the dictators get screwed over.

I don't think it would cost developed countries as much as it does the crappy ones. Look at the US. We have most of the infrastructure for the World Cup already. We have large stadiums and networks set up to handle large sporting events. It would benefit US soccer a lot and businesses would benefit, as we already have the stadiums. Countries that don't have this set up get massively screwed (except for maybe Qatar, as they got money to burn, for now). Brazil is going to be hurt. South Africa felt it hard. It doesn't offer them any benefit to host this, in rational eyes. But, of course, it isn't about economics. It is about pride.

Plus, South Africa and Qatar can qualify for the World Cup finals without being the host nation!
is it a fact that almost all host country lose money in either WC and Olympic?

Likely. I don't think numbers are every officially published though. Brazil spend like $3 billion on 2014 and Russia is estimated to be spending $5 billion. There likely won't generate that back. Even if the US spend $1 or $2 billion, it wouldn't likely make money from the game itself. Rather, it would grow a sport that would eventually "make" that money back and it wouldn't exactly ruin the economy.
 
Last edited:

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
is it a fact that almost all host country lose money in either WC and Olympic?

Almost all? Yes. But it's possible that if things are done right an Olympics can turn a profit. Los Angeles did it in 1984, mostly by using existing venues and not wasting tons of money on building white elephant stadiums. It also helped that there were no rival bidders, so they got it on the cheap. Supposedly Barcelona turned a profit too and more importantly that city went from struggling to revitalized and became a major tourist destination. That was a MAJOR home run, probably the most successful Olympics ever. And that's the problem. The fact that it *can* be done leads everyone to think that they're the ones to make it happen again. So they over promise, over spend and lose a fortune.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
I don't think it would cost developed countries as much as it does the crappy ones. Look at the US. We have most of the infrastructure for the World Cup already. We have large stadiums and networks set up to handle large sporting events. It would benefit US soccer a lot and businesses would benefit, as we already have the stadiums. Countries that don't have this set up get massively screwed (except for maybe Qatar, as they got money to burn, for now). Brazil is going to be hurt. South Africa felt it hard. It doesn't offer them any benefit to host this, in rational eyes. But, of course, it isn't about economics. It is about pride.

It's not so much infrastructure but other outrageous demands organizations like the IOC and FIFA place on host countries.

The 2022 Winter Olympics is a good example of this. After the Sochi debacle, every democratic country retracted their bids. Now only China and glorious Kazakhstan are still in the running. Only non-democratic countries are bidding because their citizens have no say.

Large international sporting events also rarely bring in lasting economic benefits these days. The always end up spending significantly more than they ever take in. Which is why I've been strongly opposed to the Pan Am games here in Toronto this year.
 

andylawcc

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
18,183
3
81
The 2022 Winter Olympics is a good example of this. After the Sochi debacle, every democratic country retracted their bids. Now only China and glorious Kazakhstan are still in the running. Only non-democratic countries are bidding because their citizens have no say.

Large international sporting events also rarely bring in lasting economic benefits these days. The always end up spending significantly more than they ever take in. Which is why I've been strongly opposed to the Pan Am games here in Toronto this year.

sounds like democracy ftw.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
71,313
14,085
126
www.anyf.ca
It's not so much infrastructure but other outrageous demands organizations like the IOC and FIFA place on host countries.

The 2022 Winter Olympics is a good example of this. After the Sochi debacle, every democratic country retracted their bids. Now only China and glorious Kazakhstan are still in the running. Only non-democratic countries are bidding because their citizens have no say.

Large international sporting events also rarely bring in lasting economic benefits these days. The always end up spending significantly more than they ever take in. Which is why I've been strongly opposed to the Pan Am games here in Toronto this year.

Speaking of Sochi I wonder what happened to all the people who lost their houses. There was a bunch of houses near the area they decided to bulldoze. Imagine having cops forcing you out of your house only to have it bulldozed right there and then in front of you.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
It's not so much infrastructure but other outrageous demands organizations like the IOC and FIFA place on host countries.

The 2022 Winter Olympics is a good example of this. After the Sochi debacle, every democratic country retracted their bids. Now only China and glorious Kazakhstan are still in the running. Only non-democratic countries are bidding because their citizens have no say.

Large international sporting events also rarely bring in lasting economic benefits these days. The always end up spending significantly more than they ever take in. Which is why I've been strongly opposed to the Pan Am games here in Toronto this year.

The costs can be mitigated to help it not be a huge loss, and for something like the World Cup, really boost the domestic soccer league. Hell, the World Cup alone helped boost MLS. The thing about hosting it in the US (or England or Germany) is they already have large stadiums and infrastructure to support mass tourism. They are not spending billions on buildings.