alkemyst
No Lifer
- Feb 13, 2001
- 83,769
- 19
- 81
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: arkcom
You guys realize having a Realtor wont cost you anything right? The seller pays all the commission, and it's the same weather you bring your own Realtor, or use theirs (the sellers agent does not represent you, or your best interests).
Have you really thought your idea out?
Have you?
Yes, but let me explain so both of you can see your flaws.
Without an agent you are talking 3-6% difference in what the seller ultimately gets back. If you seriously believe that doesn't affect the ultimate price you pay you are deluded.
Any agent you hire unless working on a flat rate is not truly representing a buyer ever. They are really always the seller's agent.
The RE agent commission model doesn't scale to the buying side. The "buyer's agent" was created during a time when stock wasn't too high in these sharks in an attempt to spin it.
They say a buyer's agent is required to present any offer you make, but myself included; have had to get into long debates in order to get our 'low ball/insane/etc' offer to the seller.
Both times in my own family (me and my parents) our offer was accepted. My parents had no counter...my seller wanted to make it so I paid their asking price, but they'd hand cash back at closing...it netted out better for me actually. I think they didn't realize I could pull the cash out of the sale like we did. The loan would never fly now.
