@RamonZarat
As far as I'm aware nvidia hasn't done anything as morally questionable as what Citibank did in the Enron affair or Union Carbide's behaviour over Bhopal, so can't we keep a sense of proportion? So they are a bit pushy in their tactics in the video card market, it's hardly selling chemical weapons to Saddam, is it?
And I think its too early to say the 480 is a complete failure. It's not a very good card in itself, true, but given the constraints I think perhaps nVidia's engineers did a good job of getting it to work at all. They succeeded in removing just enough so it won't burn a hole through the bottom of your case and go on to contaminate the water-table on its way to China, while still keeping it just ahead of the 5870, so from their point of view its "job done". Pity about the price tag, but I bet that's the minimum they can get away with also.
And surely it can't be judged entirely on its own merits, there's the question of where it leads, what comes next? Vista wasn't exactly a great success (though software is more post-release fixable than hardware) but it did seem to get certain fundamental changes out of the way, leaving room for the problems to be cleaned up later. Time will tell whether the 480 is a Vista or an Edsel. Obviously I wouldn't actually buy one myself (I can't even afford a 5870), but at least they got this one out the door and out of the way.
I feel a bit sorry for them. Designing GPUs appears to be quite difficult - who'd have thought it?