FEMA extends Michael Brown's contract

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
If this isn't a slap in the face of the Katrina victims, I don't know what is. This a$$hat gets to stay on the payroll. But what else do you expect from the Bush administration....someone being investigated? Allow that person to oversee the investigation so that you can get all of the information. wink wink.

Story

(AP) The former head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency on Wednesday defended the agency's decision to keep him on the job another 30 days as a "completely legitimate thing to do."

Michael Brown, who resigned under fire Sept. 12 after being heavily criticized for the federal government's slow reaction to the hurricane, told The Associated Press that he would help the agency complete its review of the response to Hurricane Katrina. He said he would also be reviewing for the agency a large number of Freedom of Information requests dealing with the response.

Asked in a telephone interview if he expects to complete that work by the end of his second 30-day extension, Brown replied, "Absolutely. I'm motivated to wrap it up. I'm ready to move on."

Brown resigned three days after Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff relieved him of his onsite command of FEMA's response to Katrina. The storm killed more than 1,200 people along the Gulf Coast, flooded New Orleans and forced the evacuation of hundreds of thousands. R. David Paulison was named acting director.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency is part of Chertoff's department.

Brown initially was permitted to stay on the FEMA payroll for 30 days at his $148,000 annual salary. Chertoff defended the decision to extend Brown's employment for another 30 days during an interview Wednesday as he flew to view Hurricane Wilma's damage in Florida.

"It's important to allow the new people who have the responsibility ... to have access to the information we need to do better," Chertoff said. "We don't want to sacrifice the real ability to get a full picture of Mike's experiences; we don't want to sacrifice that ability simply in order to make an image point."

Russ Knocke, the Homeland Security spokesman, has said in the past that Brown was staying on to advise the department on his experience with Katrina. He said Brown has no decision-making or management responsibilities.

The decision quickly drew fire from members of Congress.

"Keeping Mike Brown at Homeland Security to investigate his role in the Katrina fiasco is like paying Ken Lay to run a price gouging investigation," said Mississippi Congressman Bennie Thompson, ranking Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee.

Lay is the former Enron chairman now charged with fraud and conspiracy in connection with the energy company's collapse.

Mississippi Congressman Gene Taylor, whose coastal district was among the hardest hit by Katrina, said Brown's contract extension is an insult to taxpayers, particularly those Gulf Coast residents "whose lives were in danger in the aftermath of that storm because of Mike Brown's incompetence."

"I've got tens of thousands of people living in two-man igloo tents tonight, and less than a quarter of the people who have asked for FEMA travel trailers have gotten them," Taylor said. "And at the same time they can find $140,000 a year to pay this incompetent son of a gun; that's ridiculous."
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
It really is mind-boggling to me that we are paying Brownie to conduct this investigation. I literally can't think of a worse person to do it.
 

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
I think he should have volunteered a month free or with a substantial paycut.

I suspect though that they may be doing him a favor by not booting him out immediately, something that is quite inappropriate IMO
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
It really is mind-boggling to me that we are paying Brownie to conduct this investigation. I literally can't think of a worse person to do it.

The arrogance of power . . . who would hold the Executive branch accountable . . . Congress?
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: DonVito
It really is mind-boggling to me that we are paying Brownie to conduct this investigation. I literally can't think of a worse person to do it.

The arrogance of power . . . who would hold the Executive branch accountable . . . Congress?

Only the people can and they have only become sheeple supporting this corruptness by a margin of 51% but say they have a "mandate".
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: DonVito
It really is mind-boggling to me that we are paying Brownie to conduct this investigation. I literally can't think of a worse person to do it.

The arrogance of power . . . who would hold the Executive branch accountable . . . Congress?

Only the people can and they have only become sheeple supporting this corruptness by a margin of 51% but say they have a "mandate".


I disagree. Despite the cacophony of partisan rhetoric, it's hard to believe a majority of elected Republicans think it's a good idea to PAY Brown. Aside from the delusional few, most GOP pols are quite aware that no mandate exists for the Executive or Legislative branch.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Business as usual in the most corrupt administration ever to defile the White House.

 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,884
4,993
136
What else could the poor guy do? Sell tip sheets at Horse Races?

Show some compassion for the under-skilled sycophants of the administration.
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Just appoint him as a Supreme Court Justice and get it over with . . . .

and let Harriet Miers be head of (or advisor) of FEMA, I think no...... well she can be worse than that last one.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
oh my god do WE get a choice in this ?? what a farce!

he doesnt deserve to work as a shift manager at Wendy's for cryin out loud!
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Have people forgotten Brownie's response to a "dire request" email from a local FEMA official after Katrina? Don't bother me I'm having dinner.

Go away I'm eating!!
That comes off like a joke, is that a joke?
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: OrByte
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Have people forgotten Brownie's response to a "dire request" email from a local FEMA official after Katrina? Don't bother me I'm having dinner.

Go away I'm eating!!
That comes off like a joke, is that a joke?

I don't believe so. I heard Jon Stewart making fun of it also. He usually sticks to things taht can be verified.
 

fornax

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
6,866
0
76
Aah, the administration of personal responsibilty... BBond found the right word, I think, "defile". There has been a lot of trashy administrations, but the present one will make Robert Mugabe blush.

OrByte, that was not a joke, unfortunately. I wonder if the Senate will charge Brownie with perjury, as he directly lied to them about his reponse to the disaster. I think he was under oath.
 

catnap1972

Platinum Member
Aug 10, 2000
2,607
0
76
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Just appoint him as a Supreme Court Justice and get it over with . . . .

They're saving the VP post for him once Cheney is forced out/"Has a debilitating 'heart attack'"