Fed cuts interest rates by .25%

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nerva

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2005
2,784
0
0
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: 3cho
wow, legendkiller didnt comment on this thread? bleh, lacks credibility.

some of the comments have merit, but most sounds like you just read it off the finance blurb from AM NEWs.

the fed is not cutting rate because there is a downturn, the fed is cutting rate in anticipation of a downturn that could potentially be avoided.

all of you who bitch and moan about the equity markets tanking, i ask you, why? you should all know the hype associated with rate cuts, why take a long position?

I don't know what legendkiller's claim to fame is...but I work currently in a Fortune 500 builder/mortgage company and have been doing this about 25 years since I was just a kid.

Fed is cutting rates to try to get people using money again. Right now dollars aren't circulating.

Cutting prime though has a tendancy to further this cycle long term though as inflation increases and long term mortgage rates rise.

i am a banker and so is legendkiller. he probably watches the fed fund rate more closely than i do as he is more involved on the fixed income side. the fed doesnt care about the people spending money, at least not yet, this is much larger than that. a lot of companies are experiencing liquidity problems and a lower fed fund rate will get passed through to RC and TL rates. we have tons of people come to us for different debt financings, even before the cut yesterday. there seems to be somewhat of an appetite for corporate backed papers again (my bank along with a couple other sold a few bn dollars worth of corporate issued high yield debt last week alone).

the "people level" comes much much later. sure there is now more inflationary pressures, but that comes hand in hand with increased liquidity. the fed is just trying to make a market for the US dollars right now by making capital relatively more accessible.
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: 3cho
wow, legendkiller didnt comment on this thread? bleh, lacks credibility.

some of the comments have merit, but most sounds like you just read it off the finance blurb from AM NEWs.

the fed is not cutting rate because there is a downturn, the fed is cutting rate in anticipation of a downturn that could potentially be avoided.

all of you who bitch and moan about the equity markets tanking, i ask you, why? you should all know the hype associated with rate cuts, why take a long position?

I don't know what legendkiller's claim to fame is...but I work currently in a Fortune 500 builder/mortgage company and have been doing this about 25 years since I was just a kid.

Fed is cutting rates to try to get people using money again. Right now dollars aren't circulating.

Cutting prime though has a tendancy to further this cycle long term though as inflation increases and long term mortgage rates rise.

i am a banker and so is legendkiller. he probably watches the fed fund rate more closely than i do as he is more involved on the fixed income side. the fed doesnt care about the people spending money, at least not yet, this is much larger than that. a lot of companies are experiencing liquidity problems and a lower fed fund rate will get passed through to RC and TL rates. we have tons of people come to us for different debt financings, even before the cut yesterday. there seems to be somewhat of an appetite for corporate backed papers again (my bank along with a couple other sold a few bn dollars worth of corporate issued high yield debt last week alone).

the "people level" comes much much later. sure there is now more inflationary pressures, but that comes hand in hand with increased liquidity. the fed is just trying to make a market for the US dollars right now by making capital relatively more accessible.


But one, of many, problems is people will start pulling funds out of the US as the dollar drops. Heck even Buffet has been investing over seas and buying forign currency. And he has always been a US investor.
I have moved a large % of our 401k, roths, etc... in forign funds. Its paid off so far this year and this BS rate drop will only help.

 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: 3cho
wow, legendkiller didnt comment on this thread? bleh, lacks credibility.

some of the comments have merit, but most sounds like you just read it off the finance blurb from AM NEWs.

the fed is not cutting rate because there is a downturn, the fed is cutting rate in anticipation of a downturn that could potentially be avoided.

all of you who bitch and moan about the equity markets tanking, i ask you, why? you should all know the hype associated with rate cuts, why take a long position?

I don't know what legendkiller's claim to fame is...but I work currently in a Fortune 500 builder/mortgage company and have been doing this about 25 years since I was just a kid.

Fed is cutting rates to try to get people using money again. Right now dollars aren't circulating.

Cutting prime though has a tendancy to further this cycle long term though as inflation increases and long term mortgage rates rise.

i am a banker and so is legendkiller. he probably watches the fed fund rate more closely than i do as he is more involved on the fixed income side. the fed doesnt care about the people spending money, at least not yet, this is much larger than that. a lot of companies are experiencing liquidity problems and a lower fed fund rate will get passed through to RC and TL rates. we have tons of people come to us for different debt financings, even before the cut yesterday. there seems to be somewhat of an appetite for corporate backed papers again (my bank along with a couple other sold a few bn dollars worth of corporate issued high yield debt last week alone).

the "people level" comes much much later. sure there is now more inflationary pressures, but that comes hand in hand with increased liquidity. the fed is just trying to make a market for the US dollars right now by making capital relatively more accessible.


But one, of many, problems is people will start pulling funds out of the US as the dollar drops. Heck even Buffet has been investing over seas and buying forign currency. And he has always been a US investor.
I have moved a large % of our 401k, roths, etc... in forign funds. Its paid off so far this year and this BS rate drop will only help.

I've got 100% of my 401K in overseas funds, now pulling about a 26% return so far this year...

I'm a loyal citizen & all, but money is money...
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
Originally posted by: Mark R
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Just bought 800 pounds and 250 euros this morning. :)

Bear in mind that there are growing pressures on the Bank of England to cut rates too.

Major banks struggling - Northern Rock has now borrowed $50 billion in emergency funds, etc. House prices falling, Foreclosure rates surging.

Having said that there are good reasons not to:

oil price surging, natural gas and electricity prices rising fast (due to half the UK's nuke plants being offline until further notice), massive rises in food prices (bread expected to rise 40% in the next few months).

Who knows what the BoE will decide. I wonder if they'll say to hell with the pound, and just slash them to save the banks, and the national debt.

Oil prices aren't really surging in the UK though.
Oil prices in dollars are going up, but the dollar is going down, which means there's minimal net change in the price you pay for a barrel of oil in most major currencies except the dollar.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
The Fed is tasked with 2 missions, to grow the economy & control inflation.

I hate that the dollar is losing it's value, but the financial sector could really sink us without careful Fed intervention.

It's all cyclical, just pay attention to where your $ is invested & hold onto your shorts.
 

GoatMonkey

Golden Member
Feb 25, 2005
1,253
0
0
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.
 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
The Fed is tasked with 2 missions, to grow the economy & control inflation.

I hate that the dollar is losing it's value, but the financial sector could really sink us without careful Fed intervention.

It's all cyclical, just pay attention to where your $ is invested & hold onto your shorts.
So hold me close, better hang on tight
Buckle up, baby, it's a bumpy ride
We're two kids hitching down the road of life
Our world, our fight...
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
Originally posted by: GoatMonkey
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.

Because this is more a bailout for banks and creditors. The whole its for the people is BS. All these banks made billions during the rise on high risk loans and such. Now their numbers are off so they need help. :roll:
People like you and I will pay more for gas, household goods, food, etc... But don;t worry the managers at Bank of America will get some bonus and worse case their golden chutes will be fully funded.
 

Nerva

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2005
2,784
0
0
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: 3cho
wow, legendkiller didnt comment on this thread? bleh, lacks credibility.

some of the comments have merit, but most sounds like you just read it off the finance blurb from AM NEWs.

the fed is not cutting rate because there is a downturn, the fed is cutting rate in anticipation of a downturn that could potentially be avoided.

all of you who bitch and moan about the equity markets tanking, i ask you, why? you should all know the hype associated with rate cuts, why take a long position?

I don't know what legendkiller's claim to fame is...but I work currently in a Fortune 500 builder/mortgage company and have been doing this about 25 years since I was just a kid.

Fed is cutting rates to try to get people using money again. Right now dollars aren't circulating.

Cutting prime though has a tendancy to further this cycle long term though as inflation increases and long term mortgage rates rise.

i am a banker and so is legendkiller. he probably watches the fed fund rate more closely than i do as he is more involved on the fixed income side. the fed doesnt care about the people spending money, at least not yet, this is much larger than that. a lot of companies are experiencing liquidity problems and a lower fed fund rate will get passed through to RC and TL rates. we have tons of people come to us for different debt financings, even before the cut yesterday. there seems to be somewhat of an appetite for corporate backed papers again (my bank along with a couple other sold a few bn dollars worth of corporate issued high yield debt last week alone).

the "people level" comes much much later. sure there is now more inflationary pressures, but that comes hand in hand with increased liquidity. the fed is just trying to make a market for the US dollars right now by making capital relatively more accessible.


But one, of many, problems is people will start pulling funds out of the US as the dollar drops. Heck even Buffet has been investing over seas and buying forign currency. And he has always been a US investor.
I have moved a large % of our 401k, roths, etc... in forign funds. Its paid off so far this year and this BS rate drop will only help.

buffet has never been anything but a shrewd investor, meaning he invest regardless of country. he's the one to bet against the dollar when euro came out.
 

Nerva

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2005
2,784
0
0
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: GoatMonkey
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.

Because this is more a bailout for banks and creditors. The whole its for the people is BS. All these banks made billions during the rise on high risk loans and such. Now their numbers are off so they need help. :roll:
People like you and I will pay more for gas, household goods, food, etc... But don;t worry the managers at Bank of America will get some bonus and worse case their golden chutes will be fully funded.


i like to see people live without the current financial institutions, they have to be bailed out. sure maybe some banks made the wrong bets. but i would like to see companies fair without the goldmans, lehmans etc.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Well it wasnt a rate cut but BB just injected 41 billion into the credit market. The most since 9/11.

 

Nerva

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2005
2,784
0
0
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Well it wasnt a rate cut but BB just injected 41 billion into the credit market. The most since 9/11.

that's how they "cut" the rate. they dont really cut the rate, they set the target, and use open market operations to bring the rate down to that level, mainly by expanding monetary supply. google is-lm. not a perfect model, but you get the picture.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: 3cho
wow, legendkiller didnt comment on this thread? bleh, lacks credibility.

some of the comments have merit, but most sounds like you just read it off the finance blurb from AM NEWs.

the fed is not cutting rate because there is a downturn, the fed is cutting rate in anticipation of a downturn that could potentially be avoided.

all of you who bitch and moan about the equity markets tanking, i ask you, why? you should all know the hype associated with rate cuts, why take a long position?

I don't know what legendkiller's claim to fame is...but I work currently in a Fortune 500 builder/mortgage company and have been doing this about 25 years since I was just a kid.

Fed is cutting rates to try to get people using money again. Right now dollars aren't circulating.

Cutting prime though has a tendancy to further this cycle long term though as inflation increases and long term mortgage rates rise.

My claim to fame is that, when you speak of dollars circulating for mortgages, I am part of the machine that circulates them. While I don't specifically have anything to do with RMBS, I know how it works and I know who buys, who sells, and what the general market idea is in ABCP. When my market stops, *the* market stops, that is, unless corporates start lending directly on balance sheet again, which drastically reduces their ability to originate unless you want the old structures back, which have higher costs.

The Fed cut isn't really to increase liquidity. The liquidity is there, provided you have the right assets. Back a month or two ago, there wasn't liquidity. Almost all ABCP trades, moer than 1Tr of them, were done overnight at spreads of L+60 (traditionally ABCP trades at L flat). No ABS term deals were getting done. Basically, all the money that fueled the mortgage industry and all asset backed finance had gone.

This was because nobody wants to be holding the hot potato, that they don't know is hot, until it is too late. Over the last 6-8 weeks rationality returned to the market. ABCP spreads have been getting back to L-flat and trades have terms of everything from overnight to 30 days.

The Fed cut had literally nothing to do with this. It had everything to do with people figuring out what was going on, where they should spend their money, where they shouldn't, how performance was moving, how they should analyze going forward...etc.

From the perspective of trying to head off a housing led recession, the rate cuts are pissing into the wind. We blew our load over the last 5 years and now it's time to pay up. Really, all they are doing at this point is trying to head off a housing recession that would have lead to a larger broader recession. By cutting rates they are encouraging people to borrow more, hoping companies build up their companies..etc.

However, the whole premise of them building and keeping the economy going is contingent upon people having money to spend. Considering that credit card master trusts are at all-time highs, the biggy bank for equity cash-outs from mortgages are at 5-year lows, *and* inflation is gaining (non-core), you are leaving people with no avenue to buy stuff.

Thus, all they are essentially doing is trying to mitigate a massive recession in favor of a major downturn, with no negative growth, or with moderate negative growth. However, the biggest problem with that is that they are still going to run up inflation.

Effectively, all this cut and the one before it, did, was to get Wall St. addicted to crack. Look what happened when the Fed put out releases saying that they are loath to do another cut. Everybody panicked that the crack dealer was going away. Wall St. was happy after the 50bp cut because they thought that the good times would keep rolling through bonus season and things would be OK then. Look at Cramer, he was bitching like a crackwhore himself on his show and then said that his bitching was effective in getting Helicopter Ben to cut rates.

It's going to be an interesting time. I think that we are heading into uncharted waters and things will get a lot worse before they get better.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: 3cho
wow, legendkiller didnt comment on this thread? bleh, lacks credibility.

some of the comments have merit, but most sounds like you just read it off the finance blurb from AM NEWs.

the fed is not cutting rate because there is a downturn, the fed is cutting rate in anticipation of a downturn that could potentially be avoided.

all of you who bitch and moan about the equity markets tanking, i ask you, why? you should all know the hype associated with rate cuts, why take a long position?

I don't know what legendkiller's claim to fame is...but I work currently in a Fortune 500 builder/mortgage company and have been doing this about 25 years since I was just a kid.

Fed is cutting rates to try to get people using money again. Right now dollars aren't circulating.

Cutting prime though has a tendancy to further this cycle long term though as inflation increases and long term mortgage rates rise.

My claim to fame is that, when you speak of dollars circulating for mortgages, I am part of the machine that circulates them. While I don't specifically have anything to do with RMBS, I know how it works and I know who buys, who sells, and what the general market idea is in ABCP. When my market stops, *the* market stops, that is, unless corporates start lending directly on balance sheet again, which drastically reduces their ability to originate unless you want the old structures back, which have higher costs.

The Fed cut isn't really to increase liquidity. The liquidity is there, provided you have the right assets. Back a month or two ago, there wasn't liquidity. Almost all ABCP trades, moer than 1Tr of them, were done overnight at spreads of L+60 (traditionally ABCP trades at L flat). No ABS term deals were getting done. Basically, all the money that fueled the mortgage industry and all asset backed finance had gone.

This was because nobody wants to be holding the hot potato, that they don't know is hot, until it is too late. Over the last 6-8 weeks rationality returned to the market. ABCP spreads have been getting back to L-flat and trades have terms of everything from overnight to 30 days.

The Fed cut had literally nothing to do with this. It had everything to do with people figuring out what was going on, where they should spend their money, where they shouldn't, how performance was moving, how they should analyze going forward...etc.

From the perspective of trying to head off a housing led recession, the rate cuts are pissing into the wind. We blew our load over the last 5 years and now it's time to pay up. Really, all they are doing at this point is trying to head off a housing recession that would have lead to a larger broader recession. By cutting rates they are encouraging people to borrow more, hoping companies build up their companies..etc.

However, the whole premise of them building and keeping the economy going is contingent upon people having money to spend. Considering that credit card master trusts are at all-time highs, the biggy bank for equity cash-outs from mortgages are at 5-year lows, *and* inflation is gaining (non-core), you are leaving people with no avenue to buy stuff.

Thus, all they are essentially doing is trying to mitigate a massive recession in favor of a major downturn, with no negative growth, or with moderate negative growth. However, the biggest problem with that is that they are still going to run up inflation.

Effectively, all this cut and the one before it, did, was to get Wall St. addicted to crack. Look what happened when the Fed put out releases saying that they are loath to do another cut. Everybody panicked that the crack dealer was going away. Wall St. was happy after the 50bp cut because they thought that the good times would keep rolling through bonus season and things would be OK then. Look at Cramer, he was bitching like a crackwhore himself on his show and then said that his bitching was effective in getting Helicopter Ben to cut rates.

It was only effective because the final goal of the Fed was to try and head off a massive collapse of consumer confidence. Half of the population already thinks we are in a recession. The barometer is the stock market and that hasn't been going great until the cuts.

about fucking time you showed up.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: GoatMonkey
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.

Because this is more a bailout for banks and creditors. The whole its for the people is BS. All these banks made billions during the rise on high risk loans and such. Now their numbers are off so they need help. :roll:
People like you and I will pay more for gas, household goods, food, etc... But don;t worry the managers at Bank of America will get some bonus and worse case their golden chutes will be fully funded.


i like to see people live without the current financial institutions, they have to be bailed out. sure maybe some banks made the wrong bets. but i would like to see companies fair without the goldmans, lehmans etc.



I have to disagree with you there. Bailing out people just teaches them that they can get away with stuff and not have to pay for it. Banks have failed before and will continue to do so. More will raise from their ashes and people will learn from their mistakes.

Bailing people out for their own mistakes is a bad idea.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: JS80

about fucking time you showed up.

LOL, trying to get a credit request through to credit before I leave for ABS East. I have been pulling 14 hour days to get this bitch done. I am almost there and I am set for 5 days of visiting old co-workers in Orlando, eating, drinking, and trying to bring in business :).

 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: GoatMonkey
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.

Because this is more a bailout for banks and creditors. The whole its for the people is BS. All these banks made billions during the rise on high risk loans and such. Now their numbers are off so they need help. :roll:
People like you and I will pay more for gas, household goods, food, etc... But don;t worry the managers at Bank of America will get some bonus and worse case their golden chutes will be fully funded.

i like to see people live without the current financial institutions, they have to be bailed out. sure maybe some banks made the wrong bets. but i would like to see companies fair without the goldmans, lehmans etc.


I have to disagree with you there. Bailing out people just teaches them that they can get away with stuff and not have to pay for it. Banks have failed before and will continue to do so. More will raise from their ashes and people will learn from their mistakes.

Bailing people out for their own mistakes is a bad idea.

i think the median option is to pseudo bail them out and change the rules.

i would love to see these greedy assholes to have to write off all the junk but it's like "we let it happen" and if we don't "bail them out" can screw the economy.

EDIT: MARLIN PLZ STOP PUTTING {U} AFTER YOUR POST
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: JS80

about fucking time you showed up.

LOL, trying to get a credit request through to credit before I leave for ABS East. I have been pulling 14 hour days to get this bitch done. I am almost there and I am set for 5 days of visiting old co-workers in Orlando, eating, drinking, and trying to bring in business :).

haha. funnay.
 

Nerva

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2005
2,784
0
0
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: GoatMonkey
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.

Because this is more a bailout for banks and creditors. The whole its for the people is BS. All these banks made billions during the rise on high risk loans and such. Now their numbers are off so they need help. :roll:
People like you and I will pay more for gas, household goods, food, etc... But don;t worry the managers at Bank of America will get some bonus and worse case their golden chutes will be fully funded.


i like to see people live without the current financial institutions, they have to be bailed out. sure maybe some banks made the wrong bets. but i would like to see companies fair without the goldmans, lehmans etc.



I have to disagree with you there. Bailing out people just teaches them that they can get away with stuff and not have to pay for it. Banks have failed before and will continue to do so. More will raise from their ashes and people will learn from their mistakes.

Bailing people out for their own mistakes is a bad idea.


i think they should be bailed out not for their mistakes, but for what we will lack in services if the investment banks go under. who's going to do the capital raising for the companies and offer merger advice? surely the companies themselves can do this, do road shows, issue debts, but at what costs? in the end, the costs can potentially cost a lot more than the fees they pay the banks.

the banks are essential to our economy, no matter how "immoral" they seem at times.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: GoatMonkey
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.

Because this is more a bailout for banks and creditors. The whole its for the people is BS. All these banks made billions during the rise on high risk loans and such. Now their numbers are off so they need help. :roll:
People like you and I will pay more for gas, household goods, food, etc... But don;t worry the managers at Bank of America will get some bonus and worse case their golden chutes will be fully funded.

i like to see people live without the current financial institutions, they have to be bailed out. sure maybe some banks made the wrong bets. but i would like to see companies fair without the goldmans, lehmans etc.


I have to disagree with you there. Bailing out people just teaches them that they can get away with stuff and not have to pay for it. Banks have failed before and will continue to do so. More will raise from their ashes and people will learn from their mistakes.

Bailing people out for their own mistakes is a bad idea.

i think the median option is to pseudo bail them out and change the rules.

i would love to see these greedy assholes to have to write off all the junk but it's like "we let it happen" and if we don't "bail them out" can screw the economy.

EDIT: MARLIN PLZ STOP PUTTING {U} AFTER YOUR POST

Lets say Bear goes down. What affect does that have? They are all replacable, as I said, banks have gone down before, it isn't like nobody else is willing to step into their shoes. This industry makes a lot of money, somebody will always want assets (especially the dope...hah!). Now, if a Citi goes down, that has a broad implication. All-in, several banks could go down and the fittest will survive.

My bank didn't take any of this risky stuff, nor did they make the money from it. Why should we be put in the same end-game position after the bail out? Why should they be rewarded for their stupidity? It doesn't teach a lesson, one that my bank learned years ago in their own problem.

Frankly, I think they all should stand or fall on their own actions. Additionally, this bullshit about CEOs getting 160m parachutes is garbage. I have always said that these guys need to have salary directly tied to this type of stuff. If you make the company a ton of money, great, here's a big bonus! However, if you do it on all risky bets and you lose, then you lose money too.

O'Neill should be paying in, not the other way around.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: GoatMonkey
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.

Because this is more a bailout for banks and creditors. The whole its for the people is BS. All these banks made billions during the rise on high risk loans and such. Now their numbers are off so they need help. :roll:
People like you and I will pay more for gas, household goods, food, etc... But don;t worry the managers at Bank of America will get some bonus and worse case their golden chutes will be fully funded.

i like to see people live without the current financial institutions, they have to be bailed out. sure maybe some banks made the wrong bets. but i would like to see companies fair without the goldmans, lehmans etc.


I have to disagree with you there. Bailing out people just teaches them that they can get away with stuff and not have to pay for it. Banks have failed before and will continue to do so. More will raise from their ashes and people will learn from their mistakes.

Bailing people out for their own mistakes is a bad idea.

i think they should be bailed out not for their mistakes, but for what we will lack in services if the investment banks go under. who's going to do the capital raising for the companies and offer merger advice? surely the companies themselves can do this, do road shows, issue debts, but at what costs? in the end, the costs can potentially cost a lot more than the fees they pay the banks.

the banks are essential to our economy, no matter how "immoral" they seem at times.

Not all banks will go under. The strongest will survive, the weakest will die, and the medium will get hurt. All in- the sharks will eat the chum and life will go on. Lessons will be learned that if you get too fat, you are chum.



 

Nerva

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2005
2,784
0
0
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: GoatMonkey
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.

Because this is more a bailout for banks and creditors. The whole its for the people is BS. All these banks made billions during the rise on high risk loans and such. Now their numbers are off so they need help. :roll:
People like you and I will pay more for gas, household goods, food, etc... But don;t worry the managers at Bank of America will get some bonus and worse case their golden chutes will be fully funded.

i like to see people live without the current financial institutions, they have to be bailed out. sure maybe some banks made the wrong bets. but i would like to see companies fair without the goldmans, lehmans etc.


I have to disagree with you there. Bailing out people just teaches them that they can get away with stuff and not have to pay for it. Banks have failed before and will continue to do so. More will raise from their ashes and people will learn from their mistakes.

Bailing people out for their own mistakes is a bad idea.

i think they should be bailed out not for their mistakes, but for what we will lack in services if the investment banks go under. who's going to do the capital raising for the companies and offer merger advice? surely the companies themselves can do this, do road shows, issue debts, but at what costs? in the end, the costs can potentially cost a lot more than the fees they pay the banks.

the banks are essential to our economy, no matter how "immoral" they seem at times.

Not all banks will go under. The strongest will survive, the weakest will die, and the medium will get hurt. All in- the sharks will eat the chum and life will go on. Lessons will be learned that if you get too fat, you are chum.

not go under, but seriously hurt. we took a 2bn dollar write down and we didnt even participate in the subprime shit. the idea is if you are gonna bail people out, bail everyone out. the financial sector is consolidated as it is. why lose players?
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: 3cho
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: GoatMonkey
Why hasn't this stuff had and effect on the mortgage rates I'm looking at yet? I need to refinance before the end of the year since my 5 year arm is about to reach 5 years in January. I look at ING Direct Orange Mortgage and it has been the exact same 6.125% through both of these rate changes.

Because this is more a bailout for banks and creditors. The whole its for the people is BS. All these banks made billions during the rise on high risk loans and such. Now their numbers are off so they need help. :roll:
People like you and I will pay more for gas, household goods, food, etc... But don;t worry the managers at Bank of America will get some bonus and worse case their golden chutes will be fully funded.

i like to see people live without the current financial institutions, they have to be bailed out. sure maybe some banks made the wrong bets. but i would like to see companies fair without the goldmans, lehmans etc.


I have to disagree with you there. Bailing out people just teaches them that they can get away with stuff and not have to pay for it. Banks have failed before and will continue to do so. More will raise from their ashes and people will learn from their mistakes.

Bailing people out for their own mistakes is a bad idea.

i think they should be bailed out not for their mistakes, but for what we will lack in services if the investment banks go under. who's going to do the capital raising for the companies and offer merger advice? surely the companies themselves can do this, do road shows, issue debts, but at what costs? in the end, the costs can potentially cost a lot more than the fees they pay the banks.

the banks are essential to our economy, no matter how "immoral" they seem at times.

Not all banks will go under. The strongest will survive, the weakest will die, and the medium will get hurt. All in- the sharks will eat the chum and life will go on. Lessons will be learned that if you get too fat, you are chum.

not go under, but seriously hurt. we took a 2bn dollar write down and we didnt even participate in the subprime shit. the idea is if you are gonna bail people out, bail everyone out. the financial sector is consolidated as it is. why lose players?

They had to have participated in something along those lines. The best idea for any bank not willing to take write-down risk was to not get anywhere near holding RMBS in trading books, conduits, or on balance sheet as portfolio plays.

I don't think anybody should be bailed out. Capitalism is that the most fit will survive and thrive, not that the gubment will fuck with the monetary system to save banks. Now, if the whole system would collapse from this, then yes, save it all. However, that isn't likely.