• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

feasibility of economic isolation

jhu

Lifer
with all this talk of job losses overseas and rising trade deficits, i was wondering what would happen if the usa went into complete economic isolation. so that means no imports or exports. for all you armchair economists, what are the consequences of this assuming that we can adequately supply our own energy needs internally?
 
HAHAHAHAHA, no imports!!! lol

In all honesty though, no you cannot support your own energy needs...not even close...to even consider it shows complete lack of research. You'd have to convert to cavemen, as you'd have no electricity, plastic products, metals...

Sorry, nice thought though...haha...joke of the day
 
It could be done I suppose. You would need 100% state control of all importing/exporting though, and even then the black market would be HUGE for imported goods.

Not to mention a lot of things that are outsourced would have to be brought in, makes prices go ^^^^
All the companies that flog the majority of their goods in other countries would go bust

Tooling for production, and education for production and R&D would have to be developed for parts of industry that doesn't exist in the US.
And you still have a problem with natural resources. some elements just don't exist in the US. Also Energy is a large problem..
 
Even with the energy question laid to rest, you would still need raw material such as lumber, steel, uranium, albumin (used in the proccess that makes aluminium, I don't even think you have any of that naturally), the NA fisheries are in terrible shape, and all those types of things.

Let's make the question harder though: Assume that the US has all these things (by invading the North, perhaps?). What would happen if your economy closed, but was self-sustainable.

First, your products would become more expensive. The people in NY that buy cars made in Oshawa Ont. do so because it is chaper to have them made up there than in GA or WA. So, even keeping thier incomes constant, they would not be able to afford a new car. They'd have to choose between a replacement toaster or a new winter coat, instead of just buying both. Chicken, not steak. Car pooling, to save on gas. New, cheap techniques to overclock Vid cards would come about. An overall drop in standards of living. And let's not forget what business would have to put up with. They can't upgrade thier networks, revamp thier production lines or buy that shiny new Deere tractor as easily. That means that their workers would not become more productive. Which means that the businesses couldn't afford to pay them more money. This would slow the rate of growth of productivity in the long term.

Now, look on the supply side. Why does that seattle company those widjets to Vancouver, and not FLA? Because they can get paid more in Van. If they could only sell in Talahassee, they would get less money for it. That means that they would scale back production, because it wouldn't be worth it to run three lines at that price, you couldn't cover your overtime expenses for the graveyard shift. That means workers unemployed. That means (since it would happen everywhere) that there would be even less demand for the products. Note that this same thing happens to companies investing in capital. The extra money they might have put into that 3rd Transport Truck isn't worth the interest rate (even if they stayed reasonable) you'd have to pay on the loan, because you won't make enough money.

That's the long-term effects. In reality, all that coming together at once would likely be a "Perfect Storm" which would send the economy into a recession. Which could mean that it could be much worse than the scenario I painted above.

And then, what about all the assets owned by foriegners? Would you just take them? You couldn't pay fo them, your dollar would be worthless internationally. The foreigner's couldn't sell them, because you wouldln't let any productive result of those assets out of the country. What do you think would happen to American-owned assets when that happens? They would likely be expropriated by other gov'ts just in order to pay off what you (as a people, not just a gov't) owe them, for taking their land.

Hm. . . and how many people do you think would come up to Canada, or escape down through Mexico into Europe and Asia? Alot of people have Human capital that are worth more in other countries (all of a sudden) than your own. Doctors, engineers, journalists, top managers. All kicking back in London, or Rio. Making a decent lifestyle. While your country desparately needs it's best an brightest, some of them will by flying away.

Unless you stop them. Land of the free and all that.

If that scenario wouldn't screw my own country as much as yours, I'd want to see it happen, just to see the experiment.
 
Heh. All you "information technology", "marketing" and "management" people whose main job is figuring out how to get something done cheaper in the Republic of Povertystan might actually have to get your soft little hands dirty. Unthinkable. On the bright side, I guess you could always live in your SUVs after you got foreclosed on by the bank where you USED to have a gold card.
 
No country can completely cut off all trade without taking a monumental economic hit.

Not even Canada.😉
 
Originally posted by: Genx87
Ask the Soviet Union how that worked out.

Not possible.

Could work...with a massive population, good technology, and unlimited resouces comprised of most minerals.

But, the first thing any basic economics course will teach you is "trade makes everyone better off".
So by putting up barriers, economic potential is reduced significantly.
 
Basic macroeconomic theory, the idea of comparitive advantage, would be lost with isolationism. Cheap basic labor in other countries costs more here, so products requiring a lot of basic labor would be more expensive if made in the US. Our better educated workforce would need to sacrifice some of that high-tech production to meet basic needs. Even if we are better at EVERYTHING, we have limited resources, and relative to other countries, we have some areas we're better off putting our efforts into. The rest of the world would continue to benefit from this, which would leave us in the dust.
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: Genx87
Ask the Soviet Union how that worked out.

Not possible.

Could work...with a massive population, good technology, and unlimited resouces comprised of most minerals.

But, the first thing any basic economics course will teach you is "trade makes everyone better off".
So by putting up barriers, economic potential is reduced significantly.

Russia has all those. The Soviet economic/production system was the very model of inefficiency.
 
Originally posted by: jhu
i was wondering what would happen if the usa went into complete economic isolation.

It would be the end of the world as we know it...Entire civilizations would perish, hundreds of millions, if not billions would starve to death, Governments would collapse and chaos on a scale never seen before on this planet would ensue.

The magnitude of our power and our contribution to humanity would no longer be questioned.

Though we would have to invade Canada and Mexico 1st, to insure the quality of life that we have become accustomed to would not be severely impacted. 😉
 
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: jhu
i was wondering what would happen if the usa went into complete economic isolation.

It would be the end of the world as we know it...Entire civilizations would perish, hundreds of millions, if not billions would starve to death, Governments would collapse and chaos on a scale never seen before on this planet would ensue.

The magnitude of our power and our contribution to humanity would no longer be questioned.

Though we would have to invade Canada and Mexico 1st, to insure the quality of life that we have become accustomed to would not be severely impacted. 😉

It's true...use canada for the resources, and mexico as a little china for cheap goods
 
I believe most of the American economy is still domestically-oriented. International trade is on the rise but it isn't as momumental yet as some posters seem to suggest. Entire civilizations perishing? Doubtful.

Will this happen? No.
 
Our better educated workforce would need to sacrifice some of that high-tech production to meet basic needs.
Exactly. Clothes would become extremely expensive because of the large amount of labor needed to make them. The cheapest pair of sneakers would cost ~$100+ based on the fact that it currently cost Nike $2 in Chinese assembly labor to make a pair and that translates into roughly 6 hours of labor. In the US 6 hrs is roughly $100 on average.
 
we tried this, under jefferson. the economy tanked, people were REALLY unhappy, and we had to rescincd the embargo pretty quickly. and now, with our huge dependence on foreign oil, itd be exponentially worse.
 
Originally posted by: K1052
No country can completely cut off all trade without taking a monumental economic hit.

Not even Canada.😉

Especially Canada. We're one of the most trade-based economies in the world.
 
Originally posted by: jhu
with all this talk of job losses overseas and rising trade deficits, i was wondering what would happen if the usa went into complete economic isolation. so that means no imports or exports. for all you armchair economists, what are the consequences of this assuming that we can adequately supply our own energy needs internally?

Very true, just about all Dictatorships have their currency so low to be virtually worthless, pretty much where the U.S. is headed so we won't be able to afford all the importing at current levels for very long.

That's cool though because it would help stem the flow of people wanting to come here and overpopulating except for our most southern State folks crossing the Rio Grande.

 
wouldn't we have a similar situation that we have in the rest of the world with rich and poor countries but with rich and poor states instead? also, the world itself is a closed economy with no imports or exports since interplanetary trade has not been established.
 
Isolationism is an absurd doctrine. Anyone who takes it seriously is either a mainstream economist, or just easily fooled.
 
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Isolationism is an absurd doctrine. Anyone who takes it seriously is either a mainstream economist, or just easily fooled.

Now now, don't insult the mainstream economists about something they don't support!

Isolationism is one of those policies that clearly can't make anyone better-off.
 
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Isolationism is an absurd doctrine. Anyone who takes it seriously is either a mainstream economist, or just easily fooled.

That shows how much you know about economics.
 
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Isolationism is an absurd doctrine. Anyone who takes it seriously is either a mainstream economist, or just easily fooled.

Now now, don't insult the mainstream economists about something they don't support!

Isolationism is one of those policies that clearly can't make anyone better-off.

HuH? Samuelson, one of today's "top" mainstream economists claims that outsourcing is going to hurt American jobs.

 
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Isolationism is an absurd doctrine. Anyone who takes it seriously is either a mainstream economist, or just easily fooled.

Now now, don't insult the mainstream economists about something they don't support!

Isolationism is one of those policies that clearly can't make anyone better-off.

HuH? Samuelson, one of today's "top" mainstream economists claims that outsourcing is going to hurt American jobs.

Not Outsourcing is not Isolationism. Outsourcing is not Trade.
 
Back
Top