• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

FDA enables Pharma rebranding and gouging on old medications

For the past few years, Peggy Lewis has paid $10 or less for a 90-day supply of her gout drug, colchicine. But Lewis, 71, fears she will soon be forced to pay hundreds of dollars more for that medication.

Lewis, of Fairfield, Ohio, has taken colchicine for about 20 years to prevent attacks of gout, a form of arthritis that causes flares of sudden pain, stiffness and swelling in joints.

But sometime this year, Lewis will have to replace her current version with a brand-name colchicine medication, Colcrys, which, she was told, could cost up to $550 for a 3-month supply.

“I think it’s a shame," she says of the price increase. “It would take my whole Social Security check."

The jump in price follows a push by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to stop the sale of hundreds of medications that had been grandfathered onto the drug market because they were dispensed before the agency began reviewing and approving new drugs.

Colchicine, for example, which is made from a flowering plant called the Autumn Crocus, was first used for gout treatment in the 1800s.

It’s estimated that thousands of drugs fall into this “marketed, unapproved” category, and they include many other medical mainstays, including forms of the painkiller morphine and the heart drug nitroglycerine.

The agency says it is concerned that many of these medications could have safety issues that have never been brought to light. In 2008, for example, the FDA banned injected forms of colchicine after 23 deaths were linked to its use.

The FDA has called on drug manufacturers to conduct clinical trials on these unapproved medications. In return, the Agency offers them some patent protections so they can recoup their investments in the drugs.

In 2009, Philadelphia-based company, URL Pharma, which is thus far the only company that has tested colchicine and submitted an application for FDA approval, was granted the exclusive rights, for three years, to market colchicine as a treatment for gout attacks. The company was also granted the right to be the sole supplier of colchicine as a treatment for familial Mediterranean fever, a rare disease, for seven years.

Colchicine currently accounts for about 3.5 million prescriptions in the U.S. annually, according to IMS Health.

Pharmacies still carry the unapproved, generic versions of colchicine, but as these versions are forced off the market, at some point, those supplies will dry up.

When that happens, the price of colchicine is expected to soar from about $.10 to $5 per tablet.

The steep increase of Colcrys has alarmed both patients with these diseases and the rheumatologists who treat them.

“Rheumatologists are incensed – there’s anger out there," says Edward Herzig, MD, an Ohio rheumatologist who treats Lewis.
Article continues at link:
http://www.arthritistoday.org/news/colchicine-gout-drug-price053.php
And here are some current prices of this specific drug:
http://www.drugstore.com/pharmacy/prices/drugprice.asp?ndc=13310011901&aid=337096

This is OFN but before just now seeing a blurb on my local news I hadn't heard many specifics on the repercussions of the the FDA pulling old drugs as they currently are doing. This is pretty screwed up.
 
Last edited:
If it's important enough that these studies be run, let the FDA run them, at taxpayer expense.

Drug companies must be just shitting themselves in anticipation of being able to re-patent aspirin😉
 
Ahh. Who cares about the poor and elderly on fixed incomes. If they can't afford to pay grossly inflated prices to treat chronic ailments they shouldn't be around. Right?
 
Medicare expenditures have to be cut. It's hard to justify when drugs are cheap. When they cost a shit-ton, it starts to make sense.

Obamacare - when the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
 
Article continues at link:
http://www.arthritistoday.org/news/colchicine-gout-drug-price053.php
And here are some current prices of this specific drug:
http://www.drugstore.com/pharmacy/prices/drugprice.asp?ndc=13310011901&aid=337096

This is OFN but before just now seeing a blurb on my local news I hadn't heard many specifics on the repercussions of the the FDA pulling old drugs as they currently are doing. This is pretty screwed up.
The FDA needs to be abolished. It's just big pharma trying to get generics off the market. How do I know? Because the FDA is infiltrated by big pharma.

As for the 23 deaths linked to use of the drug, there's a known side effect to gout treatments--they weaken your immune system. It's the same chemical, or at least it should be, regardless of whether it's generic or brand name.
 
This kind of stuff makes me sick. I read a story the other day where a drug that's been very successful in helping delay preterm labor that has been available for $20 per dose will now become $1500 per dose, or $30,000 per pregnancy. That means thousands of children needlessly born prematurely with all sorts of terrible side effects --- because of pure greed.

I have no problem with pharma coming up with new drugs and recovering their investments etc, but to take things that have been in use for decades and jack up the cost now? That's obscene.
 
Ahh. Who cares about the poor and elderly on fixed incomes. If they can't afford to pay grossly inflated prices to treat chronic ailments they shouldn't be around. Right?

No, no. Big pharma is smarter than that. They can't profit off dead people. See, they found a way to have their cake and eat it, too. Big prices, big profits, and when people get mad, instead of fixing the real problem resulting in lowered prices, they get gov't to pay the high prices for those who can't afford them.
 
Drug companies must be just shitting themselves in anticipation of being able to re-patent aspirin😉
At university, every first year chem student makes ASA (aspirin) in the lab 😉

When they can no longer patent the actual chemical, they start to patent things like pill construction. Brand name Aspirin probably does have several patents on it right now. The store brand ASA is the same active chemical, but the pill construction is different.
 
The FDA needs to be abolished. It's just big pharma trying to get generics off the market. How do I know? Because the FDA is infiltrated by big pharma.

As for the 23 deaths linked to use of the drug, there's a known side effect to gout treatments--they weaken your immune system. It's the same chemical, or at least it should be, regardless of whether it's generic or brand name.

Great idea! I look forward to Dr Feelgood's Miracle Tonic for future treatment of infections.
 
Great idea! I look forward to Dr Feelgood's Miracle Tonic for future treatment of infections.

A week ago I watched a documentary series about the history of illegal drugs. Before the US required companies to list ingredients on things, most of those Dr Feelgood cures were really just opium or cocaine. Sometimes in extremely large amounts like 40% morphine by weight. Yeah that probably would help with your insomnia...
 
Yea it may suck but I bet I know why the FDA had to do this.

They found a couple drugs that should not be out there or should be at least tested. They ask the maker to test it and the makers say no cause best case we spend money and you pull our drug. FDA asks lawyers and are told you can’t just select drugs for re-test like that unless you can prove it is harmful, BUT you can make all of them retest since that falls under different guidelines.

Kinda like seat belt/DUI/etc… check points. You can’t select people you THINK are doing something its either you catch them (lot of people get sick/die from drug) or you check everybody (i.e. what is happening now).
 
No, no. Big pharma is smarter than that. They can't profit off dead people. See, they found a way to have their cake and eat it, too. Big prices, big profits, and when people get mad, instead of fixing the real problem resulting in lowered prices, they get gov't to pay the high prices for those who can't afford them.

This!
 
This actually isn't the first time they've done this. My dad told me that Big Pharma got some inexpensive inhalers taken off the market because Big Pharma said they were an environmental hazard and now everyone has to pay for an overpriced inhaler.

Apparently, this is popular, because people keep on voting for all this corporate welfare. Few people sincerely care, or else they'd vote for someone who would abolish the FDA. Too many people believe the BS that the FDA keeps us safe, when they do just the opposite.
 
It's neat that in 100 years my great-great grandchildren will be taking history classes that discuss the downfall of the United States.
 
At university, every first year chem student makes ASA (aspirin) in the lab 😉

When they can no longer patent the actual chemical, they start to patent things like pill construction. Brand name Aspirin probably does have several patents on it right now. The store brand ASA is the same active chemical, but the pill construction is different.


There is a drug I take called Provigil. was due to become generic about 7 years ago. The current price for the drug is about $10 per pill and at a normal dosage of 2 pills a day that equates to $600 a month. The company that owns the drug bought the only company that could produce it in the USA months before their own patent was to expire allowing generic production that would have made the cost of a months supply less than $50 . Now the drug can be sold as generic but no labs have the capability because the patent owner bought them and is refusing to make a generic version. They also stopped other companies from developing tech to manufacture it by agreeing to pay them royalty payments .

Pharma companies know all the tricks to getting around the laws.
 
The FDA probably was correct in putting these Drugs through Trial, but they should have also had a special regimen of Regulation regarding Pricing to the Patent holders. They probably didn't foresee such huge Price increases. If these Price Increases are truly required to recover the Cost for the Testing/Trials, perhaps a longer temporary protection should have been offered. However, these are likely just gouging due to lack of Competition.
 
No, no. Big pharma is smarter than that. They can't profit off dead people. See, they found a way to have their cake and eat it, too. Big prices, big profits, and when people get mad, instead of fixing the real problem resulting in lowered prices, they get gov't to pay the high prices for those who can't afford them.

All around the mulberry bush,
The monkey chased the weasel,
monkey thought twas all in fun,
PoP! goes the weasel.
 
Back
Top