TastesLikeChicken
Lifer
- Sep 12, 2004
- 16,852
- 59
- 86
He's probably talking about me, but naturally he misrepresents my stance on the subject and has shown previously that he doesn't have the mental faculties to properly comprehend the argument in the first place. Either that, or he has the mental faculties but allows his emotional viewpoint to supercede any rational thought on the subject.Originally posted by: GarfieldtheCat
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: GarfieldtheCat
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: GarfieldtheCat
Don't forget that Torture and waterboarding are illegal, both by federal law, the Geneva Convention, and the UN convention against torture.
That's certainly a second area where there could be a lot of indictments if someone ever had the guts to prosecute this.
So are you admitting torture and waterboarding are separate things? lol
No, but some people *cough* *cough* seem to think they are. It's easier to write it that way, then to have some people *cough* *cough* try to start BS about waterboarding isn't torture.
I hope you aren't referring to me.. because I've made it clear I think waterboarding _IS_ torture. I also think we should use waterboarding on certain terror suspects. And just to be consistent, I agree to be waterboarded if I am caught engaging in acts of terror against another country.
No, it isn't you.
He's also wrong that waterboarding is illegal under Federal law. No Federal law specifically singles out "waterboarding" as being illegal. That's not to say that waterboarding can't be classified as "torture," which is illegal. But he neglects that there's a judgement call involved in doing so, though he likes to pretend there is no such judgement call, like so many others in here.
btw. If the Dems were against waterboarding as much as they claim they could easily make a law specifically prohibiting waterboarding. They won't, however, because to them, waterboarding is political tool and little more. The only time they tried to pass any such law was when the GOP had a congressional majority and/or they knew Bush would veto any such attempt. Now the Dems have the control. So why don't the pass the law now? With all the previous debate about waterboarding it seems odd they'd just drop such a hot potato and hide it out of sight. Or not, if you realize they were using it as nothing more than political leverage, as a hot button issue, and never had any intent to have waterboarding be illegal. Yellow-bellied assholes.
