FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama admn approved nuclear deal

[UglyCasanova]

NY Post picking up on it

http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/

 

[UberNeuman]

NY Post picking up on it

http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/

lol....

 

[SinOfLiberty]

Propaganda from horses mouth

 

[Jhhnn]

It’s The Hill and the NYT so yeah I trust what they are telling me is the truth.

The NYP isn't the NYT.

 

[UglyCasanova]

The NYP isn't the NYT.

You are correct, but the NYT is the NYT.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

 

[Jhhnn]

You are correct, but the NYT is the NYT.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

True enough-

https://www.forbes.com/2009/01/12/giustra-clinton-kazakhstan-pf-ii-in_rl_0912croesus_inl.html

 

[ivwshane]

I must have missed it, what’s the answer?

The same reason the Russians sent trump emails. The same reason Nigerian scammers send out emails. They were looking for a mark or someone to corrupt.

 

[fskimospy]

I must have missed it, what’s the answer?

You already quoted the answer to your own question. I’m at a loss as to the difficulty.

 

[fskimospy]

NY Post picking up on it

http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/

Lol NY Post editorial.

Why not admit you ran with an idea without evidence? You’re just embarrassing yourself.

 

[UglyCasanova]

Are you denying that the Clinton Foundation received millions from parties associated with the Uranium One deal?

 

[fskimospy]

Are you denying that the Clinton Foundation received millions from parties associated with the Uranium One deal?

Going to have to refer you to my questions on the first page, none of which you have been able to answer in any way.

 

[UglyCasanova]

Senate Judiciary opens probe into Obama-era Russian nuclear bribery case

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-probe-into-obama-era-russian-nuclear-bribery


Move along, nothing to see here....

 

[cytg111]

Lol NY Post editorial.

Why not admit you ran with an idea without evidence? You’re just embarrassing yourself.

Herh, googled around for a sec :
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pres...itorial-board-tough-proud-and-honest-trump-un

"Tough, Proud And Honest: Trump At The UN"

Hahahahahahahahaahaha

 

[fskimospy]

Senate Judiciary opens probe into Obama-era Russian nuclear bribery case

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-probe-into-obama-era-russian-nuclear-bribery

Move along, nothing to see here....

There’s nothing in that story that shows even a single shred of wrongdoing by Clinton.

You’ve been reduced to ‘Clinton must have done something wrong because Congress is having hearings on it’, (lol Benghazi) which makes no sense.

I will never understand this irrational fixation on Hillary Clinton and presumed corruption that exists entirely independent of any evidence.

 

[fskimospy]

Herh, googled around for a sec :
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pres...itorial-board-tough-proud-and-honest-trump-un

"Tough, Proud And Honest: Trump At The UN"

Hahahahahahahahaahaha

If you can’t trust the Post editorial board who can you trust? Lol.

He’s desperate. Sometimes if all you can find is a right wing tabloid editorial from the ‘headless man found in topless bar’ people that’s what you go with.

 

[Paratus]

Senate Judiciary opens probe into Obama-era Russian nuclear bribery case

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-probe-into-obama-era-russian-nuclear-bribery


Move along, nothing to see here....

That's sound you heard was dozens of senators sighing with relief.

Finally we can stop answering question about our failures on healthcare, gun control and that "other" FBI probe and concentrate on what we know best. Investigating Clinton!

(Of course republicans need to be careful what they wish for, by the transitive property of BothSidesDoIt (TM) if she's guilty, he's guilty too )

 

[cytg111]

There’s nothing in that story that shows even a single shred of wrongdoing by Clinton.

You’ve been reduced to ‘Clinton must have done something wrong because Congress is having hearings on it’, (lol Benghazi) which makes no sense.

I will never understand this irrational fixation on Hillary Clinton and presumed corruption that exists entirely independent of any evidence.

It is the closest thing, something from 8 years ago, one can hold to the marching KK in the streets... something maybe from 7-8 years ago vs the moron in chief, the general decline of democracy in the USA and the ignorant illiterate facists matching in the streets. - Something maybe a decade ago.

 

[brandonbull]

There’s nothing in that story that shows even a single shred of wrongdoing by Clinton.

You’ve been reduced to ‘Clinton must have done something wrong because Congress is having hearings on it’, (lol Benghazi) which makes no sense.

I will never understand this irrational fixation on Hillary Clinton and presumed corruption that exists entirely independent of any evidence.

I'm sure you think Trump's pee pee dossier is real as well.

 

[IronWing]

I'm sure you think Trump's pee pee dossier is real as well.

People are saying

 

[fskimospy]

I'm sure you think Trump's pee pee dossier is real as well.

I mean duh, several parts of it have been independently verified. Are you claiming otherwise?

As to the pee part specifically I have no idea if that’s true or not. I wouldn’t even care if it were outside of that it would be funny. I doubt a single American doesn’t know that he’s a repulsive person so what’s one more thing?

 

[brandonbull]

It’s a legitimate question that no one has answered yet. Why would Russian nuclear officials be funneling millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation?

Because they want to be better people.

 

[Jhhnn]

Are you denying that the Clinton Foundation received millions from parties associated with the Uranium One deal?

No. So what?

 

[UglyCasanova]

No. So what?

Wouldn’t you say that presents a conflict of interest given Hillary was Secretary of State at the time?

 

[cytg111]

I'm sure you think Trump's pee pee dossier is real as well.

Arh common, you know its real too. It is just too good a fit to be a lie.

 

[cytg111]

Wouldn’t you say that presents a conflict of interest given Hillary was Secretary of State at the time?

Maybe. Depends on the circumstances, it could also be a simple ploy by thd russians to undermine the Clintons on their home court.
But you know if something shady there then the hammer must fall.
But you know, since you are backing the blob ball in chief and all ALL the shady deals peaking up from the Mueller investigation so far from the fraction that has been leaked, I sure do hope you'll stand as vigilant with the truth come Donald as you do your best to smear Hillary.