FBI Told To "Back-0ff" Muslim Converts

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,972
5,054
136
Originally posted by: Duwelon


The outright attempts at deception via mocking and shutting down dissent from the left is shocking.





Some people just present such screwed up illogic that they are just begging for mockery.

And of course the "right" never stoops to this level, either.

Do you now see how ridiculous your post is?

Don't be so shocked when it gets ridiculed.



 

BarrySotero

Banned
Apr 30, 2009
509
0
0
Originally posted by: Hacp
Not surprising considering the rumors of Obama being a closet Muslim.
Look at the attempted Bronx bombing. Look at shooting of the solders. What do they have in common? Muslim converts were behind it!


As Obama lifts Muslims to the top of the civil rights ladder in US, while making Israel walk the plank under the shadow of nuke kooks in Iran (no problemo for Obama - he did say they were a "small" threat in campaign) - it pays to remember it was Saudis and anti-Israel persons who helped Obama with Harvard (Obama had weak grades according to Northwestern University professor John L. McKnight who wrote letter to Harvard for Obama so people rallied to get him accepted).

Percy Sutton the Black Panther lawyer and owner of WLIB said he was asked to write ) his friends" at Harvard on Obama's behalf:


"New evidence has emerged that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was closely associated as early as age 25 to a key adviser to a Saudi billionaire who had mentored the founding members of the Black Panthers.

In a videotaped interview this year on New York?s all news cable channel NY1, a prominent African-American businessman and political figure made the curious disclosures about Obama.

?I was introduced to (Obama) by a friend who was raising money for him. The friend?s name is Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, from Texas. He is the principal adviser to one of the world?s richest men. He told me about Obama.?

Sutton, the founder of Inner City Broadcasting, said al-Mansour contacted him to ask a favor: Would Sutton write a letter in support of Obama?s application to Harvard Law School?

Video is here:

"Obama and Khalid Mansour"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EcC0QAd0Ug


The Saudi billionaire that Dr. Khalid al-Mansour represented was Prince Alwaleed - nephew of Saudi Arabi's King Abdullah (who Obama bowed before so deeply).

Prince Alwaleed had 10 million donation refused by Giuliani because he tied donation to Palestine - calling for the United States to ?re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stand toward the Palestinian cause... our Palestinian brethren continue to be slaughtered at the hands of Israelis while the world turns the other cheek,?

He also gave 20 million to Harvard in 2005.

Dr. Khalid al-Mansour is a rabid hater of Israel, Jews, Whites:

"he asserts that it is a "lie" that "Ashkenazi" (European) Jews are descended from the ancient Israelites, and that they therefore have no legitimate claim to Palestine, which they "stole" from its rightful Arab owners. According to Mansour, European Jews are really descended from a Central Asian tribe known as the Khazars, not the ancient Jews. This is a theory that was invented by American (white) racists in the late nineteenth century, was strongly endorsed by the Nazis, and has recently been adopted by the PLO, other Arab and Muslim propagandists, as well as the (white racist, Aryanist) Christian Identity movement in the United States. Mansour has also said in a video-recorded speech that American blacks have a right to kill and even torture whites as revenge for the wrongs that whites have done them."

http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/5917

You can see him in action here:

Dr. Khalid Al Mansour - Christians Designed Discrimination
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDeAnC-6P0Q


Khalid Al Mansour is basically another Rev Wright. Obama's words may not seem to reflect his mentors but his actions certainly do.
 

BarrySotero

Banned
Apr 30, 2009
509
0
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
This really is a one-way conversation for you, eh Barry?

All I mostly seem get as digs about "delusions" and "wiinnar". Not much to answer to really. Holder says Muslims are going to top of civil rights ladder. If I see that's wrong (like most Americans too it seems) I am disordered in some people eyes (probably disordered themselves lol). Such are the charms of posting on the web and I wouldn't change it.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,972
5,054
136
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
This really is a one-way conversation for you, eh Barry?

All I mostly seem get as digs about "delusions" and "wiinnar". Not much to answer to really. Holder says Muslims are going to top of civil rights ladder. If I see that's wrong (like most Americans too it seems) I am disordered in some people eyes (probably disordered themselves lol). Such are the charms of posting on the web and I wouldn't change it.

But seriously, WWYBYWB?
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Originally posted by: Rainsford
[ I don't think Muslims should get extra civil liberties, but the ones they should have anyways seem like they really DO need some extra protection.

You actually do agree with special rights for Muslims - which is what Obama/Holder are setting up. Again I will mention poll showing vast majority of Americans are against this sort of thing:

'83% Say U.S. Legal System Should Treat All Americans Equally'

"Eighty-three percent (83%) of U.S. voters say America?s legal system should apply the law equally to all Americans rather than using the law to help those who have less power and influence. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that just 8% disagree.

This belief is shared overwhelmingly by Republicans, Democrats and voters not identified with either party."

http://www.rasmussenreports.co..._all_americans_equally

No, I actually DON'T agree with special rights for Muslims. If I did, I would have said so, instead of saying the exact opposite. What part of "I don't think Muslims should get extra civil liberties" did you find hard to understand?

What I WAS saying is that I think there is a real danger that Muslims will NOT be treated equally by the American legal system, and that it seems reasonable for government officials to pay close attention to make sure that doesn't happen.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
The OP is right. We should just round up all the Muslims in America and put them in concentration camps.
 

BarrySotero

Banned
Apr 30, 2009
509
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Originally posted by: Rainsford
[ I don't think Muslims should get extra civil liberties, but the ones they should have anyways seem like they really DO need some extra protection.

You actually do agree with special rights for Muslims - which is what Obama/Holder are setting up. Again I will mention poll showing vast majority of Americans are against this sort of thing:

'83% Say U.S. Legal System Should Treat All Americans Equally'

"Eighty-three percent (83%) of U.S. voters say America?s legal system should apply the law equally to all Americans rather than using the law to help those who have less power and influence. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that just 8% disagree.

This belief is shared overwhelmingly by Republicans, Democrats and voters not identified with either party."

http://www.rasmussenreports.co..._all_americans_equally

No, I actually DON'T agree with special rights for Muslims. If I did, I would have said so, instead of saying the exact opposite. What part of "I don't think Muslims should get extra civil liberties" did you find hard to understand?

What I WAS saying is that I think there is a real danger that Muslims will NOT be treated equally by the American legal system, and that it seems reasonable for government officials to pay close attention to make sure that doesn't happen.

There are already laws to protect people. Holder is making Muslims more special - which DOJ also did when it dropped charges against club wielding, Black Panthers intimidating voters in Philly.

Obama has said he want a double standards in legal system. He wants judges to look at wealth, race etc in a judges decision making. This is flaming hypocrisy from a guy who has said the Constitution was flawed because it wasn't radical enough to redistribute wealth (like Marxists). Obama does not reflect America - he rules like a foreigner with anti-American and Anti Israel resentments (and maybe also anti-UK, anti-France etc). Obama is an angry flake who has practiced trying to seem James Bond cool - and media lets him get away with it. He is tyrant in making and a nutter in general.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: Vic
I hear Obama eats babies too.

Correction, only christian babies =)

Another epic fail post. Too stupid to even get into.

Muslim.... LOL - Barry, you are an idiot of great magnatude.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Originally posted by: Rainsford
[ I don't think Muslims should get extra civil liberties, but the ones they should have anyways seem like they really DO need some extra protection.

You actually do agree with special rights for Muslims - which is what Obama/Holder are setting up. Again I will mention poll showing vast majority of Americans are against this sort of thing:

'83% Say U.S. Legal System Should Treat All Americans Equally'

"Eighty-three percent (83%) of U.S. voters say America?s legal system should apply the law equally to all Americans rather than using the law to help those who have less power and influence. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that just 8% disagree.

This belief is shared overwhelmingly by Republicans, Democrats and voters not identified with either party."

http://www.rasmussenreports.co..._all_americans_equally

No, I actually DON'T agree with special rights for Muslims. If I did, I would have said so, instead of saying the exact opposite. What part of "I don't think Muslims should get extra civil liberties" did you find hard to understand?

What I WAS saying is that I think there is a real danger that Muslims will NOT be treated equally by the American legal system, and that it seems reasonable for government officials to pay close attention to make sure that doesn't happen.

There are already laws to protect people. Holder is making Muslims more special - which DOJ also did when it dropped charges against club wielding, Black Panthers intimidating voters in Philly.

Yes, there are laws...but they are only as good as the people who enforce them. So far as I can tell, NOTHING Obama, the DOJ, or anyone else has said suggests they think anyone should be doing anything beyond making sure the laws are enforced fairly. The fact that you think saying that constitutes a special privilege is a big indicator of the problem here.

Edit: Stop with your dishonest "rephrasing", find me a quote from Obama or anyone in his administration saying they think Muslims should have special rights...or stop posting this bullshit.
 

Mr. Lennon

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2004
3,492
1
81
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
WoW!! You think the mods would be able to ban people using their IP addresses.
This thread is going nowhere quick.

The words -- paranoid and delusional and winnar...comes to mind!

An easy way to tell difference between lib and cons is that libs always want to shut down information/opinions they dont like - all while squealing about freedom of speech for pornographers, terrorists etc.

Returning to topic at hand, I am sure Obama will go for laws making non politically correct speech a crime (as in France etc.)

100% true. Obama reek's of muslim sympathy while degrading his own country everywhere he goes. We're not a christian nation, but we're probably one of the biggest muslim ones! Then liberal snakes like Eskimospy and most of the batty left on here want you to believe there is nothing to worry about.

The outright attempts at deception via mocking and shutting down dissent from the left is shocking.

So much fail...

Barry and Duwelon...thank you for always providing me with such comedic posts on this board.
 

BarrySotero

Banned
Apr 30, 2009
509
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Originally posted by: Rainsford
[ I don't think Muslims should get extra civil liberties, but the ones they should have anyways seem like they really DO need some extra protection.

You actually do agree with special rights for Muslims - which is what Obama/Holder are setting up. Again I will mention poll showing vast majority of Americans are against this sort of thing:

'83% Say U.S. Legal System Should Treat All Americans Equally'

"Eighty-three percent (83%) of U.S. voters say America?s legal system should apply the law equally to all Americans rather than using the law to help those who have less power and influence. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that just 8% disagree.

This belief is shared overwhelmingly by Republicans, Democrats and voters not identified with either party."

http://www.rasmussenreports.co..._all_americans_equally

No, I actually DON'T agree with special rights for Muslims. If I did, I would have said so, instead of saying the exact opposite. What part of "I don't think Muslims should get extra civil liberties" did you find hard to understand?

What I WAS saying is that I think there is a real danger that Muslims will NOT be treated equally by the American legal system, and that it seems reasonable for government officials to pay close attention to make sure that doesn't happen.

There are already laws to protect people. Holder is making Muslims more special - which DOJ also did when it dropped charges against club wielding, Black Panthers intimidating voters in Philly.

Yes, there are laws...but they are only as good as the people who enforce them. So far as I can tell, NOTHING Obama, the DOJ, or anyone else has said suggests they think anyone should be doing anything beyond making sure the laws are enforced fairly. The fact that you think saying that constitutes a special privilege is a big indicator of the problem here.

Edit: Stop with your dishonest "rephrasing", find me a quote from Obama or anyone in his administration saying they think Muslims should have special rights...or stop posting this bullshit.

Even if there were no "special laws" people catch the drift of a PC wind. Airlines have already been compromising a long time because of law suits from people like the terrorist affiliated CAIR (who wanted to be able to sue people for reporting suspicious behavior if a Muslim was involved.

The facts are that Obama has been morphing into exactly what many people feared. He is a radical who is forcing socialist/Marxist changes that go well beyond what the "change" people expected. People did not want a gov. seizing banks and car companies. Obama is also pursuing a Muslim agenda that favors them and abandons Israel despite public denials
otherwise. Obama is now friends with dictators and terrorists and former US friends are now being iced.

People often wondered how the German people could have voted for Hitler despite things like Mein Kampf warning of what kind of person Hitler was. Well people also voted for Obama despite his radicalism being glaringly evident. Obama got to punk America because half the country asked for it despite the facts.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
People often wondered how the German people could have voted for Hitler despite things like Mein Kampf warning of what kind of person Hitler was. Well people also voted for Obama despite his radicalism being glaringly evident. Obama got to punk America because half the country asked for it despite the facts.

One page in and we've already met Godwin's law? Sheesh, you're fast Barry. Most impressive.
 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
People often wondered how the German people could have voted for Hitler despite things like Mein Kampf warning of what kind of person Hitler was. Well people also voted for Obama despite his radicalism being glaringly evident. Obama got to punk America because half the country asked for it despite the facts.

One page in and we've already met Godwin's law? Sheesh, you're fast Barry. Most impressive.

Does Godwin apply when the the OP invokes Godwin on his own thread? :confused:

Might be another internet first! :D
 

BarrySotero

Banned
Apr 30, 2009
509
0
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
People often wondered how the German people could have voted for Hitler despite things like Mein Kampf warning of what kind of person Hitler was. Well people also voted for Obama despite his radicalism being glaringly evident. Obama got to punk America because half the country asked for it despite the facts.

One page in and we've already met Godwin's law? Sheesh, you're fast Barry. Most impressive.

Actually I don't equate Obama with Hitler. Hitler was his own source of evil where Obama is an extension of others (Soros for sure, Saudis perhaps).

My analogy is limited to the voters. If Obama was like Hitler when the Germans voted for him the same people would have voted for him anyway. Indeed, if Obama came on TV tomorrow and said "I am a Marxist wannabe dictator" the media and some voters would stick with him anyway. Obama was not the problem as much as the American public . They are so pathetically mis-educated and naive. Obama and gang know just how dumb people really are. On this anniversary of D Day its sad to see how transmogrified the American public is. They deserve Obama frankly.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,904
6,787
126
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
People often wondered how the German people could have voted for Hitler despite things like Mein Kampf warning of what kind of person Hitler was. Well people also voted for Obama despite his radicalism being glaringly evident. Obama got to punk America because half the country asked for it despite the facts.

One page in and we've already met Godwin's law? Sheesh, you're fast Barry. Most impressive.

Actually I don't equate Obama with Hitler. Hitler was his own source of evil where Obama is an extension of others (Soros for sure, Saudis perhaps).

My analogy is limited to the voters. If Obama was like Hitler when the Germans voted for him the same people would have voted for him anyway. Indeed, if Obama came on TV tomorrow and said "I am a Marxist wannabe dictator" the media and some voters would stick with him anyway. Obama was not the problem as much as the American public . They are so pathetically mis-educated and naive. Obama and gang know just how dumb people really are. On this anniversary of D Day its sad to see how transmogrified the American public is. They deserve Obama frankly.

You think you see your fellow citizens in danger of their own ignorance and that you have a special insight that can save them. That sounds, somehow familiar to me. ;)

Take note of what you do with those feelings. The only sane reaction that I can see is love. If you need to change people by force, if this or that group needs to die, if you need to seize control to save people, if you hate them for their ignorance, I think you can pretty well conclude that you are crazy and need some emotional help. If there are demons out there those demons are you. Good luck. I am personally confident that none of your fears are real, that you have been overstimulated somehow in your imagination. I don't think Obama is the person you claim but I am always watching. I don't deny the possibility of anything.
 

BarrySotero

Banned
Apr 30, 2009
509
0
0
Nobody needs special insight to see US has an emerging tyrant. Basic old common sense is really all that's needed and all that's lacking. The people lacking the common sense think the people that still have it are out of touch. Nice try anyway.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,904
6,787
126
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Nobody needs special insight to see US has an emerging tyrant. Basic old common sense is really all that's needed and all that's lacking. The people lacking the common sense think the people that still have it are out of touch. Nice try anyway.

Not a problem. It is quite natural that people who have been sensitized to a point of view also assume they are rational and have common sense and that others who do not share their sensitivity are simply out of touch.

It would be like walking through a garden with somebody terrified of bees. They would see your disregard as insanity.

There isn't any way to tell if you are the crazy one except by being tremendously honest and serious. Good luck.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
Nobody needs special insight to see US has an emerging tyrant. Basic old common sense is really all that's needed and all that's lacking. The people lacking the common sense think the people that still have it are out of touch. Nice try anyway.

He's a tyrant because he doesn't want the government oppressing Muslim-Americans in the name of fighting terrorism? That monster! :roll:

Of course everything I really need to know about your posts can be pretty well figured out from looking at your troll-a-rific user name...so I'm not really surprised that you think "common sense" leads you down the road you're following.
 

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
The OP is saying that Mr Obama is:

1. A Muslim or at least a Muslim sympathizer.

2. A sociopathic double talker

3. does not reflect America - he rules like a foreigner with anti-American and Anti Israel resentments (and maybe also anti-UK, anti-France etc). Obama is an angry flake who has practiced trying to seem James Bond cool - and media lets him get away with it. He is tyrant in making and a nutter in general.

4. a radical who is forcing socialist/Marxist changes that go well beyond what the "change" people expected. People did not want a gov. seizing banks and car companies. Obama is also pursuing a Muslim agenda that favors them and abandons Israel despite public denials
otherwise. Obama is now friends with dictators and terrorists and former US friends are now being iced.



What percentage of US voters agree with the OP? 0.05%, 0.005%, 0.0005%
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Barry, I am ASHAMED!

That I wasted 3 minutes of my life reading this thread and your bull sheet.