FBI Exploits attorney-client privilege Exception to Nab Dirty Businessman

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Running a business is not the same as being a community organizer. A good judge would throw this out.

link

CEO Bust: Video Reveals FBI Tactics in Bribery Probe

Prosecutors Use Tougher Methods to Police Overseas Business Dealings; ‘They Are Looking Into S— in Colombia’

When Joseph Sigelman invited Gregory Weisman into his Miami condo he didn’t know exactly what his longtime general counsel had to tell him, but he knew it was something bad—something the attorney insisted on telling him in person.

As they settled down to talk on his balcony, what Mr. Sigelman also didn’t know was that Mr. Weisman had become a Federal Bureau of Investigation informant and was secretly recording the December 2012 conversation with a tiny camera worn on his body, in a video made part of the court record in federal district court in Camden, N.J.

“Do you want to start out with work or do you want to start with the big secret?” asked Mr. Sigelman in the video. Mr. Sigelman was previously chief executive of PetroTiger Ltd., an oil-services firm operating in Colombia, Ecuador and Panama. For eight years, Mr. Weisman had worked as a general counsel for Mr. Sigelman’s business ventures and sometimes also served as his personal lawyer.

“We have issues, we have big issues,” said Mr. Weisman. “I get a knock on my door. It’s the FBI....They are looking into s— in Colombia... They were asking about these payments you had me make to Johanna Navarro. ”

The secret recording, excerpted here, captures a rare inside look at two embattled executives grappling with the weight of a federal investigation into alleged bribery. In recent years, the U.S. Department of Justice has ramped up enforcement against companies that bribe overseas officials, but has settled most cases with companies out of court, leaving the human element of corporate corruption cases hidden from view. The video reveals some of the ambiguities executives can face when doing business in countries where corruption is rife. When is a payment to a well-connected consultant really a bribe? Who is to blame for a shared decision to make a payment when no one person understands the entire nature of the transaction?

Mr. Sigelman, who maintains his innocence, will go to trial in April on charges that he violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which makes it a crime to bribe foreign officials. The video is evidence in the case and illustrates the tougher tactics that prosecutors are taking to pursue white-collar crime. Secret videos and undercover informants—once the stuff of drug busts—are taking an increasingly important role in cases against corporate executives.

Prosecutors say the $333,500 in payments discussed by the two men were really bribes for Ms. Navarro’s husband David Duran, a Colombian official at the state-run oil company Ecopetrol and helped the company win a contract worth $39.6 million. In the recording, Mr. Sigelman said the payments didn’t result in any business gained and that the deals obtained from Ecopetrol were unrelated.

Mr. Weisman and Knut Hammarskjold, the company’s former co-chief executive, have pleaded guilty to FCPA offenses. “As soon as the government approached Mr. Weisman he accepted complete responsibility on the matter,” said Michael Schwartz, an attorney for Mr. Weisman. “As part of his acceptance of responsibility he agreed to cooperate in any way the government deemed appropriate.”

Kevin Walsh, an attorney for Mr. Hammarskjold, declined to comment.

David Duran and Johanna Navarro, residents of Colombia, haven’t been charged with any crime, according to court documents. An assistant to Darlene Calzon Barror, Mr. Duran’s last known U.S.-based attorney, said the firm had lost contact with him more than a year ago.

In the recording, after Mr. Weisman revealed the unsettling news, Mr. Sigelman began to offer an explanation and then paused. “Do me one favor, just lift your shirt,” Mr. Sigelman said quietly, apparently looking for a secret recording device. Mr. Weisman asked him to do the same. The recording is briefly obscured as Mr. Weisman pulled his shirt up and blocked the camera’s view, but Mr. Sigelman didn’t spot the tiny device. “You’re hairy, man,” Mr. Weisman said.

Mr. Sigelman looked out over the seaside view and said he was struggling to recall the alleged payment to Ms. Navarro. “I’m trying to remember the deal...and I swear to God I don’t think I remember which one it was,” Mr. Sigelman said. “Knut found this guy and I’ve literally forgotten his name. His first name was David or something. He was supposed to be an adviser to us for looking at this sale, this potential sale,” Mr. Sigelman said. “The sale never happened. There was no gain. It was nothing, we never won anything. We never got to second base...We never even submitted even a bid.”

It was a consulting payment pure and simple, Mr. Sigelman insisted, leaning back in his chair. “I don’t understand how this is a bad thing.”

Mr. Weisman pushed the issue, sounding incredulous. “A payment of a large sum of money to someone at Ecopetrol in connection with the deal?”

Mr. Sigelman appeared puzzled. “I don’t think he worked at Ecopetrol. Did he work at Ecopetrol?”

“That’s what he told me, yeah,” Mr. Weisman said.

And in any case, Mr. Weisman said, sounding increasingly shaken, why was the payment made to the man’s wife, Ms. Navarro? “The secrecy,” Mr. Sigelman explained, “was that the guy just didn’t want to pay the tax.”

Throughout the conversation Mr. Sigelman sought to blame his former co-chief executive Mr. Hammarskjold who he said understood the technical side of the business and managed relationships with Colombians. “Knut is the one you should throw under the bus for that, 100%. I don’t know any of these guys,” Mr. Sigelman said. “How many Colombians do I f—ing speak to? I can’t even speak to them. This was Knut.”

An attorney for Mr. Hammarskjold declined to comment on the contents of the video.

This wasn’t how Mr. Weisman remembered events, he said in the video, and he didn’t know how he could explain away this incident to authorities. “If I have to answer questions, I don’t know what I’m going to say,” Mr. Weisman said.

Mr. Sigelman bowed his head for a moment scratching his scalp. He raised his head and spoke quietly. “As long as we’re like this,” he said, holding up two fingers pressed tightly together, “I’ll 100% never let you down. Promise. Have you ever seen me break a promise? I’ll never break a promise.”

The most important thing, Mr. Sigelman said, was for his colleague to calm down. “You have to stop f—king panicking, seriously,” Mr. Sigelman said. Panic could cause Mr. Weisman to do something “stupid” in dealing with authorities.

“Look, I never wanted to be involved in this kind of s—. And now I have FBI agents coming to visit me,” Mr. Weisman said. “I’m really scared.”

Messrs. Sigelman and Hammarskjold created the company in 2009 in Colombia, with Mr. Weisman serving as general counsel. But the three soon came into conflict with their Colombian board, representing PetroTiger’s investors, over the direction of the company. The three men were ousted by March 2011. The law firm Sidley Austin LLP, which counseled the board in its dispute with the founders, conducted an internal investigation and by July 2011 turned over evidence of alleged misconduct to U.S. authorities.

In the recording, Mr. Sigelman said he believes that conflict with the board is what put the two in hot water. “This is the Colombians signing a deal with us and then deciding to be vengeful,” Mr. Sigelman said. “At the end of the day the most important thing and I mean this...you and I are victims here.”

—Sara Schaefer Muñoz in Bogota contributed to this article.

Write to Joel Schectman at joel.schectman@dowjones.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Are you mentally handicapped? What the hell does Barack Obama have to do with this, lol.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
Are you mentally handicapped? What the hell does Barack Obama have to do with this, lol.

I'm up for bashing Obama as much as anyone but I don't see any connection here.







Wait. Is Obama Columbian?
 

marincounty

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,227
5
76
Which is it, Obama is lazy and plays golf all of the time while Rome burns, or Obama is busy micro-managing everything including the FBI?
It's hard to keep up with the right wing outrage.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Are you mentally handicapped? What the hell does Barack Obama have to do with this, lol.

Obama appoints the head of the FBI and, more importantly, the DoJ. The DoJ have been especially aggressive and too happy to attack businessmen. This is but the latest.
 

Jimzz

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2012
4,399
190
106
wow, what a really stupid post.

As said this has nothing to do with Obama.
And if you think this violates the attorney-client privilege then that shows how little you know about it. This is well coved by the crime/fraud exception. And in this case its not even close, there is no attorney-client privilege violation.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
The Attorney-Client privilege is like most other things: It has exceptions.

Does this particular case qualify for an exception? IDK, but I'd guess several judges will be having a look at it.

Fern
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
Well the OP has succeeded in uniting democrats and Republicans. The only thing we agree on is the OP is a dumbass but it's a start.
 

cbrunny

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2007
6,791
406
126
Obama appoints the head of the FBI and, more importantly, the DoJ. The DoJ have been especially aggressive and too happy to attack businessmen. This is but the latest.

waste of outrage.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
wow, what a really stupid post.

As said this has nothing to do with Obama.
And if you think this violates the attorney-client privilege then that shows how little you know about it. This is well coved by the crime/fraud exception. And in this case its not even close, there is no attorney-client privilege violation.

The Attorney-Client privilege is like most other things: It has exceptions.

Does this particular case qualify for an exception? IDK, but I'd guess several judges will be having a look at it.

Fern

Could you guys link the exceptions? The lawyer in this case served as the personal lawyer for the target. I thought A-C privilege was sacred.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91

You seem to have some extra spring in your step this evening. Finished your taxes? Wife giving you sex???

ANyway, thanks for the link. From that wiki page, none of the exceptions applied. He should be acquitted. This is 100% entrapment. My great uncle was an FBI agent. He must be turning in his grave.
 
Last edited:

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
You seem to have some extra spring in your step this evening. Finished your taxes? Wife giving you sex???

ANyway, thanks for the link. From that wiki page, none of the exceptions applied. He should be acquitted.

Just trying to lighten things up. I don't see the point in raging over this when there are so many real things to focus on.

IANAL, so I can't help with case law.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
The entire case against Don Siegelman was and continues to be a travesty of justice. What the WSJ article states is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of malicious prosecution and judicial misconduct. The only thing that I can fault the Obama administration for at this point is by not unilaterally granting him a pardon.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
The entire case against Don Siegelman was and continues to be a travesty of justice. What the WSJ article states is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of malicious prosecution and judicial misconduct. The only thing that I can fault the Obama administration for at this point is by not unilaterally granting him a pardon.

Has he been convicted of anything?
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Post deleted. Wrong Siegelman. Normally when I hear/discuss the prosecution of anyone named Siegelman, it can only be about one person - Don Siegelman. The OP addresses another.
 
Last edited: