Star Wars is actually okay. Okay, not good. However the whole series is pervaded by such utter and unfettered nerdiness, that it would be something of a guilty pleasure at best. The fandom of this tale is appalling, and I laugh and poke at them at every opportunity, which here, seems almost daily.
It is amazing what a difference editing can make to the movies.
All the difference. An unedited film is unwatchable. An editor can take the same 12 hours of footage and make a horror, drama, love story, comedy, or any other genre out of it regardless of any other factor including the dialogue.
There's some old Studio instructional productions out there that show the power of editing. Until you see various editor's takes on the same scene, it's hard to image how much impact editing has on a film. They are only second to the writer imo.
You have nearly 7,000 posts on an internet tech forum.
Really, just stop. The stones you're throwing are cracking your glass walls.
Uh... writers in movies are notoriously powerless over the quality of a movie, Mr Poseur.
Yep, many things can go wrong after the ink dries, but if the ink was no good, nothing that comes afterword can save the film.
A square is always a rectangle.
All good films have good writing.
A rectangle is not always a square.
Not all well-written films are good.
Yep, many things can go wrong after the ink dries, but if the ink was no good, nothing that comes afterword can save the film.
If the script sucks, it can be rewritten.
C'mon. You know as well as I do that he could have put out *any* version of SW, edits, originals, etc, and it would have sold just the same. It wasn't as if people were going to refuse to buy SW on DVD unless he make revisions to them. That is perhaps the most dense comment from this entire thread if you truly believe it.
No sane individual can possibly think his "edits" to ROTJ made the film better. The reason he made the special editions, IMO, was two-fold:
1. Test the technology available to see if it was ready for the prequels.
2. To release them in the theaters and later on video to rake in the cash.
Were there minor things needing correction in the movies? Yes. Was what he did to ROTJ necessary? Absolutely not, and the changes were so monumentally bad that they have tarnished the movie forever. Seriously, my six-year old niece wouldn't have done something that stupid. If you want to sit here and claim he made horrific changes like that for "artistic" reasons and not financial ones, be my guest; I think that makes him look even worse.