Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Isn't this what we wanted though? Zero tolerance? No nasty grey areas?
It's paradise.
Too late. :disgust:Originally posted by: DrPizza
It was in England. The place where they're charging the guy whose car was stolen with the expense of repairing the police cars involved in the chase. The place where a lady needed a permit to have a kiddie wading pool & needed a lifeguard.
Hopefully it never gets that bad here.
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Isn't this what we wanted though? Zero tolerance? No nasty grey areas?
It's paradise.
Zero tolerance on paper looked good. But when coupled with Zero common sense its a disaster.
Next on FOX: When Politicians Attack!Originally posted by: DrPizza
It was in England. The place where they're charging the guy whose car was stolen with the expense of repairing the police cars involved in the chase. The place where a lady needed a permit to have a kiddie wading pool & needed a lifeguard.
Hopefully it never gets that bad here.
The pervert has a whole website with pictures of his goats, even the kids!Originally posted by: waggy
just don't start takeing pictures of yoru goats. damn pervert!
My god.....I think my parents even took pictures of me in that state.Originally posted by: jonks
Actually, when they were even younger, he and his wife would put them in the bath NAKED and rub their little bodies with soap. Freaks.
"Matthews also looks at cases like the one of a high school student visited by the Secret Service for taking a photograph of a magazine page of President George Bush with a thumbtack in his head."
Originally posted by: ArizonaSteve
It's because of bullshit like this that I never want to have kids.
Originally posted by: DrPizza
It was in England. The place where they're charging the guy whose car was stolen with the expense of repairing the police cars involved in the chase. The place where a lady needed a permit to have a kiddie wading pool & needed a lifeguard.
Hopefully it never gets that bad here.
Originally posted by: ryan256
Originally posted by: DrPizza
It was in England. The place where they're charging the guy whose car was stolen with the expense of repairing the police cars involved in the chase. The place where a lady needed a permit to have a kiddie wading pool & needed a lifeguard.
Hopefully it never gets that bad here.
The place where they've banned private gun ownership and crime has gotten worse!
Originally posted by: waggy
no no..the best thing to do is ban kids.
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
Originally posted by: SearchMaster
I hate dumb people.
Most girls I know consider under their skirts to be private... dammit.Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: FeuerFrei
Only in England.
ORLY?
In the US when we catch perverts we then uphold their right to be perverts!
http://www.cwfa.org/articles/1.../pornography/index.htm
Imagine taking your 16-year-old daughter to the store and having a pervert aim a camera up her skirt and take pictures. You would expect the man to be arrested, tried and convicted for being a peeping tom. But if you live in Oklahoma, you would be wrong. Only two out of the three steps in the process happened; the pervert was not sent to jail. (The American Heritage College dictionary defines a "pervert" as "one who practices sexual perversion" and "perversion" as "a sexual practice or act considered deviant." In my opinion, this man is a pervert.)
Instead, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ruled 4-1 to dismiss the charges because Riccardo Gino Ferrante and the young girl were both in a public place when he decided to photograph her private parts. The "brilliant" piece of judicial reasoning behind this travesty of justice goes something like this: The "Peeping Tom" statute requires the victim to be "in a place where there is a right to a reasonable expectation of privacy."
Originally posted by: pravi333
Originally posted by: Anubis
sighi too hate dumb people
however legally you are alowed to take pics of anyone in a public place
that is what i thought. People should come with burka's if they dont want to get photographed!
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: Alyx
I've actually heard of this happening a lot. Its really common. Its not happened to me yet but its only time. I've gotten a lot of nasty looks from parents when the camera is not even pointed toward them. Eventually someone is going to end up confronting me when I've done nothing wrong.
Oh, stop being melodramatic. It is not common, it does not happen "a lot". Yes, it happens occasionally, by paranoid, idiotic parents.
Originally posted by: Citrix
england is just crazy what happened to them?
Originally posted by: jonks
As to your 'travesty of justice' comment, I suppose we should just stop prosecuting all crimes that aren't murders and assault because they are a waste of our time? And if it were my daughter, the only assault going on would be me smashing the fucker's camera into his face.
