Charles Kozierok
Elite Member
- May 14, 2012
- 6,762
- 1
- 0
Revenge killing is just not morally justifiable. I may empathize with the father's anger and subsequent action upon seeing his daughter molested/raped, but I object to the sentiment expressed here that killing somebody in a blind rage is an example of justice served. This sentiment expresses many of the things that civil society and civil human beings have struggled against - chaotic might makes right law enforcement, glorification of and giving into base animalistic emotions like anger, and murder. Two wrongs don't make a right. Murdering somebody as revenge, even for something horrible, ISN'T a just action. It may not be an action that should be as heavily punished as "regular" murder, but it certainly isn't just.
You're being flamed simply for being rational and fair in a thread where most people just want to express their outrage and anger. It's easy to lash out and talk big about revenge on the Internet, of course.
I don't know what I would do in this situation (if it really was as depicted). Maybe I'd have strangled the guy with my bare hands. Sometimes people do kill out of anger, and sometimes the person killed even deserved to die, but that doesn't make it any less murder.
What I find most disturbing is the sheer number of people who would apparently let the father walk with no evidence to back up his claim of what happened. It stretches the limits of believability to actually think the father had to kill this guy to stop him from doing whatever he (allegedly) was doing.