• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Fat chicks

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.

That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.

Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?

 
I don't have a set maximum as long as the overall shape is still nice.

Extreme example to get my point across:

You have identical triplets that are all 20lbs overweight.
The first has it all in her waist line.
The second has it all in her as$.
The 3rd has it spread evenly over her body.

The 3rd is gonna look a whole lot better imo than the other two.

That said, I'm fairly short so I don't want a girl that is much taller than me so I'd say none over 5'8".
 
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
OK, how bout I word it differently...would you prefer tall and skinny? short and tiny? a little bit to grab onto? ribs showing? an ass you can see from the front?...
I don't really prefer girls taller than 5'8" ... and I don't like bone-thin at all. As for the opposite end of the spectrum, as long as she's got a bikini-body (meaning - not afraid to show herself), then it's just fine. Health is important to me too.
 
Originally posted by: Deeko
Is this ILoveLamp character a fat girl trying to justify herself or something?

Haha I don't blame ya for thinking so, but no, this was inspired when a guy friend of mine said that he would never date anyone heavier than 125lbs, even if she was 5'10, and I was mostly just wondering if a lot of guys felt this way. Or if I just have a**hole friends.
 
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
What height/weight combo would be the maximum that you would date, and what's the heaviest girl you've ever gone for?

depends on the girls build... if all the weight is in her chest 120-130 is ok on a big busted gal.. as long as she dont have a gut or a nasty butt

there are cute small girls that got a lil weight on them to support a huge natural rack =P ie my wife was 5'6 120 but she was supportting natural 36 DDs on her frame...but still had a flat tummy and no handles..

 
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.

That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.

Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?


define "bigger"

if bigger means this then I would prefer a beautiful face to a ugly girl with a skinny body.

However if bigger means this then aahhhhhh uggggghhhh noooooo ahhhhhh ehhhhh eeeeee

-Max
 
If I throw my back out when I try to carry her through a doorway, she's to fat...regardless of any of her other good qualities.
 
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
What height/weight combo would be the maximum that you would date, and what's the heaviest girl you've ever gone for?

depends on the girls build... if all the weight is in her chest 120-130 is ok on a big busted gal.. as long as she dont have a gut or a nasty butt

there are cute small girls that got a lil weight on them to support a huge natural rack =P ie my wife was 5'6 120 but she was supportting natural 36 DDs on her frame...but still had a flat tummy and no handles..

Damn, 5'6 120 and huge boobs, that's just unhealthy.
 
Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?
I really could put up with neither. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.

That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.

Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?

important late night decision...paper or plastic
but that only works for the face :evil:
 
Originally posted by: Doboji
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.

That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.

Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?


define "bigger"

if bigger means this then I would prefer a beautiful face to a ugly girl with a skinny body.

However if bigger means L=this]http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/IBJEDI7/newstarsfat.jpg[/L] then aahhhhhh uggggghhhh noooooo ahhhhhh ehhhhh eeeeee

-Max


hahaha no, bigger means like plus-size model bigger, not have to lift someone out of the house with a crane bigger. I can understand why no one would wanna date someone ultra obese, but to me the first one isnt bad at all.
 
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
What height/weight combo would be the maximum that you would date, and what's the heaviest girl you've ever gone for?

depends on the girls build... if all the weight is in her chest 120-130 is ok on a big busted gal.. as long as she dont have a gut or a nasty butt

there are cute small girls that got a lil weight on them to support a huge natural rack =P ie my wife was 5'6 120 but she was supportting natural 36 DDs on her frame...but still had a flat tummy and no handles..
Damn, 5'6 120 and huge boobs, that's just unhealthy.
yah really bad for her back...
she was always sore..
Navy Doc said she should have a reduction... but she didnt want one =/


 
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.

That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.

Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?

Secret answer C: Jerk off instead.
 
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Doboji
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.

That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.

Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?


define "bigger"

if bigger means this then I would prefer a beautiful face to a ugly girl with a skinny body.

However if bigger means L=this]http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/IBJEDI7/newstarsfat.jpg[/L] then aahhhhhh uggggghhhh noooooo ahhhhhh ehhhhh eeeeee

-Max


hahaha no, bigger means like plus-size model bigger, not have to lift someone out of the house with a crane bigger. I can understand why no one would wanna date someone ultra obese, but to me the first one isnt bad at all.


Same with me.... especially if she's got a good sense of humor and her head screwed on tight. Most of the people here on ATOT are still living in the world of Mary Palmer and her 5 sisters, totally unaware that they themselves are repulsive and will never ever ever get to sleep with Elisha Cuthbert or anyone that looks even remotely like her.

-Max

 
I'm a tall guy (6'5"), and generally go for girls in the 5'7" - 5'9" range at about 120lbs...but really that is all relative to how the girl is built.

My current girlfriend is like 5'10" and only weighs around 115lbs, but she is on the virge of being too skinny (she has long legs and an overall "athletic" body).

One of my recent girlfriends was 5'7" and weighed 145. That may sound big, but she really wasn't. Mostly just fit with a large chest and broad shoulders.

You really can't pin it down to a height/weight ratio.
 
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
What height/weight combo would be the maximum that you would date, and what's the heaviest girl you've ever gone for?

depends on the girls build... if all the weight is in her chest 120-130 is ok on a big busted gal.. as long as she dont have a gut or a nasty butt

there are cute small girls that got a lil weight on them to support a huge natural rack =P ie my wife was 5'6 120 but she was supportting natural 36 DDs on her frame...but still had a flat tummy and no handles..
Damn, 5'6 120 and huge boobs, that's just unhealthy.
yah really bad for her back...
she was always sore..
Navy Doc said she should have a reduction... but she didnt want one =/


was?
 
I perfer short 5'2"-5'5"(petite) with a little bit of love handles. Front and Back is a plus!

Unfortunately most Asian women, Skinny+Tall = Flat as a Wall (Front + Back)
 
as long as she looks good, i don't care what the scale says.

my g/f is 5'6" 120 .. she's thin without being anorexic looking ... now if she were only a little taller (i'm 6'3" .. 5'8"-5'10" is my ideal)
 
Back
Top