Fastest Monolithic Single Core x86 CPU

nenforcer

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2008
1,767
1
76
The world will probably never see a newly designed, single core CPU of any architecture.

I wanted to know what is the fastest single core x86 CPU produced by both AMD & Intel.

I don't want to include running a single core (Turbo Boost) of a multi core CPU, either.

I will try and include both Opteron and Xeon server chips but I don't know enough about those.

Of the existing single core CPU's for sale I don't think you can count the

AMD Sempron 140 / 145 (Sargas) since despite AMD's marketing it as a single core it will actually unlock to a Athlon X2 4400E CPU.

Intel has the Celeron 430 Conroe-L LGA775 @ 1.8GHz with 512Kb L2 Cache but at that speed I don't think it would qualify for the fastest if it is truly a single core Core 2.

To me it looks like on the AMD side it was the

AMD Athlon 64 FX 90nm San Diego core FX-55 and FX-57 @ 2.6GHz and 2.8GHz.

Or perhaps it was a Socket AM2 Athlon 64 Orleans 90nm or Lima 65nm?

It looks like the Orleans only went up to 2.6GHz while the Lima to 2.8GHz.

On the Opteron side I'm not sure if the full 1MB L2 Cache made either the Socket 940 Venus, Troy or Athens 1356 @ 3.0GHz the fastest?

The Intel CPU's I know less about since I avoided them at this time. It looks like its either the Prescott 2M CPU with 2MB L2 Cache 662 / 672 @ 3.6GHz and 3.8GHz.

Or could it be the Pentium 4 Cedar Mill 631 / 641 / 651/ 661 up to 3.6GHz? Wikipedia says overclockers got these up to 8GHz with liquid nitrogen cooling but I'm not asking about overclocking performance.

Maybe its a Socket 603 Xeon Irwindale chip I know nothing about? Everything I read says that the Opterons of this time outperformed the Xeon's in everything but a few benchmarks where Hyperthreading came into play, which sort of overrules my single core requirement.

Anyone who actually used these chips know which is the fastest?
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,570
10,202
126
The question is, why? Why limit yourself to a single-core, when you can get multi-core chips that are still the fastest for single-threaded apps.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
26,946
15,919
136
Sorry, but I agree with Larry. This is a silly question in this context...You can get a quad core, with less power usage than a single core FX57, and even one of the 4 cores is more powerful than the FX-57
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Opteron 156 is definitively the fastest single-core processor ever released when you take overclocking totally out of the equation. (and ignore newer multicore chips which annihilate these things in IPC).
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Sorry, but I agree with Larry. This is a silly question in this context...You can get a quad core, with less power usage than a single core FX57, and even one of the 4 cores is more powerful than the FX-57

I think this is an academic question, and not one of practicality. OP doesn't appear to be trying to build some weird single-core box, just asking a question.
 

Absolution75

Senior member
Dec 3, 2007
983
3
81
I believe the correct answer would be the fastest clocked sandby bridge processor with 3 cores disabled.
 

slag

Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
10,473
81
101
I believe the correct answer would be the fastest clocked sandby bridge processor with 3 cores disabled.

You clearly missed page 115 of the stipulation list which said it has to be a native single core processor. :)
 

Edgy

Senior member
Sep 21, 2000
366
20
81
This may not qualify but I remember hearing that AMD did produce few Opteron 158 and 160 chips for special customers that never made it to open markets years back.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
59
91
Anyone who actually used these chips know which is the fastest?

Fastest at what?

The 486 cpu's used in many shuttle launches and deep-space probes probably went the fastest of any single-core.

I don't think they ever adopted pentium class (rad-hardened, etc) for space, could be wrong though, haven't talked to the NASA guys in a while.
 

IntelUser2000

Elite Member
Oct 14, 2003
8,686
3,786
136
Fastest at what?

The 486 cpu's used in many shuttle launches and deep-space probes probably went the fastest of any single-core.

I don't think they ever adopted pentium class (rad-hardened, etc) for space, could be wrong though, haven't talked to the NASA guys in a while.

LMFAO! Yea they sure were "fast".

I've read of an article where one of the satellites launch in 2005 or something was supposed to feature the PowerMac G5 CPU. I don't know if that ever materialized.
 
Nov 26, 2005
15,188
401
126
Fastest at what?

The 486 cpu's used in many shuttle launches and deep-space probes probably went the fastest of any single-core.

I don't think they ever adopted pentium class (rad-hardened, etc) for space, could be wrong though, haven't talked to the NASA guys in a while.

lol, thread win
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,019
3,489
126
Fastest single core is probably the p3.

The one which was the predecessor to the dolthan processor, which is the predecessor of the all mighty yonah, which brought us C2D.

Incase u guys are wondering C2D was one step back, and 2 steps forward for intel.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
59
91
Fastest single core is probably the p3.

The one which was the predecessor to the dolthan processor, which is the predecessor of the all mighty yonah, which brought us C2D.

Incase u guys are wondering C2D was one step back, and 2 steps forward for intel.

The P3 was faster than the K7, the K8 and the P4?
 

veri745

Golden Member
Oct 11, 2007
1,163
4
81
Probably the fastest am3 sempron. Those OC really well too.

Except those are native dual-core with one core disabled. AMD didn't make any single core dies at 45nm, and I don't think they made any at 65nm either.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,098
3,603
136
Kind of like asking what is the highest specific output flat head engine?

Who cares?
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
Kind of like asking what is the highest specific output flat head engine?

Who cares?

Obviously you don't, so why are you posting in the thread?

My guess would be one of the AMD FX series processors.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,098
3,603
136
Obviously you don't, so why are you posting in the thread?

My guess would be one of the AMD FX series processors.


Yeah you're right. I apologize to the OP for that rude remark. I meant to say why are you interested in knowing?
 

fire400

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2005
5,204
21
81
we can always buy a multi-core cpu and disable the other cores, but I'm sure most people don't do this unless for specific tasks.
 

nenforcer

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2008
1,767
1
76
How about the Core Solo T1500?

That is a good choice for Intel's side but it appears that even though the Yonah core was still 32-bit it had 2 cores on die, one of which was disabled to make a Core Solo.

I'm surprised but this is actually more difficult to answer than I thought it would be.
 

dorion

Senior member
Jun 12, 2006
256
0
76
With the ring bus or what ever it is called on Sandy Bridge maybe we could see a single core SB, it is supposed to scale easily... and scaling means up and down.
 

IntelUser2000

Elite Member
Oct 14, 2003
8,686
3,786
136
In terms of performance per clock: Athlon 64
Pure performance: 3.8GHz 65nm Pentium 4's based on Cedarmill core might do it