Did I say anything about that reporter? Also, you're making an assumption about what actually went down. Apparently her own organization didn't buy her version of events. I dunno, I wasn't there.
Good, let the long-festering GOP tactics of self-doubt and bias injection cloud your vision and pervert your independent thought processes.
it's clear that bias confirmation is far more important to you than factual information that very much challenges these biases.
"I don't know, the company does not buy her version of events." (you know, it's not like
they were there, either).
"I don't know what to believe--it's not like I was there."
it seems that not only do you not understand the role of journalism, you have convinced yourself that it no longer has any role in reporting events to you accurately and without bias. At least, so long as that reporting does not conflict with the way you want things to be.
Why is it more logical to you that a reporter's experience at an event is less accurate than her company's interpretation of the event that they did not attend?
Further, why is it likewise so easy for you to dismiss claims "because you weren't there?"
Do you see how this poison of intellectual dishonesty has wormed its way into your brain and caused you to make a pathetic display of yourself?
You are what the GOP wants and are exactly ripe for the exploitation of Trump. It's a good thing, I think, and I dare say you might actually understand that. Support him or not, you are exactly the soldier that has long been primed by your handlers to be exploited by this interloper in the very real goal of destroying your masters. Hopefully you and others can come out of this with a renewed ability to think for yourself.
