farcry2 vs. crysis

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

EvilComputer92

Golden Member
Aug 25, 2004
1,316
0
0
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
Originally posted by: skace
There is a fucking rift between Crysis level graphics and Far Cry 2. And that's coming from someone who enjoys both games. It's not bias, it's fact. I hate posting this without being able to back it up but every gaming related site is blocked from here. There are screenshots from Crysis realism attempts where they compare real life pictures to in game shots and it's actually hard to tell the difference. Plus the character modeling in these 2 games is night and day.

Sigh.

Have you played the game? Those screenshots were all the hype before release, but they've since toned down the graphical quality. The game doesn't look quite photorealistic anymore, although it does look damn good.

Actually, if you go to crymod and look at teh screenshot contests, the best "photorealistic" screenshots came from the level editor community a year after the game was released.

The stock levels have the graphics toned down quite a lot. However, the mod community has shown that the engine is still capable of producing the graphics in the alpha. Far Cry 2 does not even come close to that level of graphical quality.

Here is the ultra high config

It looks even more amazing than crysis, and also runs even worse.
A minimum of a 8800 series is required, probably 200 series preferable.
Here is a specific level that shows off how crysis should have looked
alpha
 

NYHoustonman

Platinum Member
Dec 8, 2002
2,642
0
0
Originally posted by: jaredpace
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
I have both games and Far Cry 2 is not even close to Crysis, it runs better but it also looks worse, not to mention FC2 has a crappy console-adapted FOV that gave me headaches and made my eyes tired until a user released a hack for it.

Don't start FUD like this.

It's not FUD, look at the picture.

If you've really played both games on a capable PC, I don't see how you could possibly disagree. Far Cry 2 looks good, but after seeing Crysis...
 

MustangSVT

Lifer
Oct 7, 2000
11,554
12
81
Blah.. just tried Farcry 2 and I think they've messed it up. Now it has that console feel to it and I dont like that for FPS.

Just finished Rainbow6 vegas2 doesnt help as that game is superior in everyway for me.

I guess I'll move onto Crysis Warhead.

Pass.
 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,665
21
81
Originally posted by: MustangSVT
Blah.. just tried Farcry 2 and I think they've messed it up. Now it has that console feel to it and I dont like that for FPS.

Just finished Rainbow6 vegas2 doesnt help as that game is superior in everyway for me.

I guess I'll move onto Crysis Warhead.

Pass.

I thought Warhead was actually a lot better than the original Crysis.
 

AdamK47

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,675
3,529
136
That screenshot in the first post makes for a horrible comparison. It's easy to see the screenshots are altered and do not depict actual in game quality. I wish my FC2 looked like that, minus the blur filter that was used when altering the shot.
 

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,982
3,330
146
Crysis definitely has way more advanced graphics and physics. Farcry 2 is pretty and smoother but there is no way it comes even close to Crysis in terms of advanced graphics/physics.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
It's not even close in the game. Crysis looks far better. Crysis is also the better game.
Metacritic:
Crysis: 91, users score 7.7
Farcry 2: 87, users score 5.9
 

roid450

Senior member
Sep 4, 2008
858
0
0
far cry 2 is not bad at all. i think its more realistic looking as far as colors go since crysis is always nice and bright and vibrant. thats not the usual real life scenario.

here's some far cry 2 FWIW on the highest settings with 4x AA and 8x AF

http://i70.photobucket.com/alb...8-11-1113-41-16-60.jpg
http://i70.photobucket.com/alb...8-11-0521-29-36-17.jpg
http://i70.photobucket.com/alb...8-11-0521-27-15-04.jpg
http://i70.photobucket.com/alb...8-11-0412-21-54-98.jpg
http://i70.photobucket.com/alb...8-10-2813-55-47-02.jpg
http://i70.photobucket.com/alb...8-11-0417-00-08-53.jpg

these pics have lost some of the original quality after they were uploaded and converted to jpeg. if anyone know how to keep all original quality please let me know :p