Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
Originally posted by: skace
There is a fucking rift between Crysis level graphics and Far Cry 2. And that's coming from someone who enjoys both games. It's not bias, it's fact. I hate posting this without being able to back it up but every gaming related site is blocked from here. There are screenshots from Crysis realism attempts where they compare real life pictures to in game shots and it's actually hard to tell the difference. Plus the character modeling in these 2 games is night and day.
Sigh.
Have you played the game? Those screenshots were all the hype before release, but they've since toned down the graphical quality. The game doesn't look quite photorealistic anymore, although it does look damn good.
Actually, if you go to crymod and look at teh screenshot contests, the best "photorealistic" screenshots came from the level editor community a year after the game was released.
The stock levels have the graphics toned down quite a lot. However, the mod community has shown that the engine is still capable of producing the graphics in the alpha. Far Cry 2 does not even come close to that level of graphical quality.
Here is the
ultra high config
It looks even more amazing than crysis, and also runs even worse.
A minimum of a 8800 series is required, probably 200 series preferable.
Here is a specific level that shows off how crysis should have looked
alpha