Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
Originally posted by: skace
There is a fucking rift between Crysis level graphics and Far Cry 2. And that's coming from someone who enjoys both games. It's not bias, it's fact. I hate posting this without being able to back it up but every gaming related site is blocked from here. There are screenshots from Crysis realism attempts where they compare real life pictures to in game shots and it's actually hard to tell the difference. Plus the character modeling in these 2 games is night and day.
Sigh.
Have you played the game? Those screenshots were all the hype before release, but they've since toned down the graphical quality. The game doesn't look quite photorealistic anymore, although it does look damn good.
Actually, if you go to crymod and look at teh screenshot contests, the best "photorealistic" screenshots came from the level editor community a year after the game was released.
Originally posted by: jaredpace
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
I have both games and Far Cry 2 is not even close to Crysis, it runs better but it also looks worse, not to mention FC2 has a crappy console-adapted FOV that gave me headaches and made my eyes tired until a user released a hack for it.
Don't start FUD like this.
It's not FUD, look at the picture.
Originally posted by: MustangSVT
Blah.. just tried Farcry 2 and I think they've messed it up. Now it has that console feel to it and I dont like that for FPS.
Just finished Rainbow6 vegas2 doesnt help as that game is superior in everyway for me.
I guess I'll move onto Crysis Warhead.
Pass.