Far Cry 64 Bit released today!!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

McArra

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,295
0
0
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Have you tried 2gig? What facts have you based your opninion on.?


As you can probably already tell, none of the additions or enhancements have anything to do with 64-bit memory addressability. In fact, a fast GPU is all you really need to take advantage of most of these features - not a 64-bit CPU. The patched version of Far Cry doesn't even eat up more than 512MB of memory during normal gameplay, and supporting more insects and birds doesn't really depend on more architecture registers provided by AMD64 either.

From anandtech.


By the way, I can see all the 64bit version goodies in win XP SP2, is this suposed to happen¿?
 
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
Originally posted by: McArra
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Have you tried 2gig? What facts have you based your opninion on.?


As you can probably already tell, none of the additions or enhancements have anything to do with 64-bit memory addressability. In fact, a fast GPU is all you really need to take advantage of most of these features - not a 64-bit CPU. The patched version of Far Cry doesn't even eat up more than 512MB of memory during normal gameplay, and supporting more insects and birds doesn't really depend on more architecture registers provided by AMD64 either.

From anandtech.


By the way, I can see all the 64bit version goodies in win XP SP2, is this suposed to happen¿?


what u mean you arent running some version of 64bit windows?
 

PrayForDeath

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2004
3,478
1
76
Originally posted by: McArra
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Have you tried 2gig? What facts have you based your opninion on.?


As you can probably already tell, none of the additions or enhancements have anything to do with 64-bit memory addressability. In fact, a fast GPU is all you really need to take advantage of most of these features - not a 64-bit CPU. The patched version of Far Cry doesn't even eat up more than 512MB of memory during normal gameplay, and supporting more insects and birds doesn't really depend on more architecture registers provided by AMD64 either.

From anandtech.


By the way, I can see all the 64bit version goodies in win XP SP2, is this suposed to happen¿?

How do you know you are, if you're not comparing it with a 64bit OS?
 

McArra

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,295
0
0
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: McArra
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Have you tried 2gig? What facts have you based your opninion on.?


As you can probably already tell, none of the additions or enhancements have anything to do with 64-bit memory addressability. In fact, a fast GPU is all you really need to take advantage of most of these features - not a 64-bit CPU. The patched version of Far Cry doesn't even eat up more than 512MB of memory during normal gameplay, and supporting more insects and birds doesn't really depend on more architecture registers provided by AMD64 either.

From anandtech.


By the way, I can see all the 64bit version goodies in win XP SP2, is this suposed to happen¿?


what u mean you arent running some version of 64bit windows?

Exactly, I istalled the patch in win64, played the game etc. Then I installed a new driver for my audigy and the game would make my comp restart since then.
So I went to winXP and run Farcry, and surprise, all the new goodies where there.

If this isn't supposed to happen I'll tell how I did LOL

 

MustangSVT

Lifer
Oct 7, 2000
11,554
12
81
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Originally posted by: ddogg
i doubt there would be big performance difference....anyway i cant try it out since i dont have xp64

No need to guess... check out the review of it on the main page...

lmao..

to me forums.anandtech.com is the main page :p

havent been at www.anandtech.com for months :)
 

MustangSVT

Lifer
Oct 7, 2000
11,554
12
81
Originally posted by: narcotic
this is the recommended system specs from AMD's website:

Recommended System Specs for 64-Bit Version:
Supported OS: Windows® XP, Windows® XP Professional x64 Edition
Processor: AMD Athlon? 64 processor 3400+
RAM: 2GB
Video Card: ATI Radeon x800 or NVIDIA GeForce 6800 family or better
Sound Card: Creative Labs or Turtle Beach add-in card
DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0 included with 64-bit OS

And I say, you gotta be sh!tting me...


?? so it will work with regular XP? non 64 version?? odd..
 

vision33r

Member
Jan 21, 2005
106
0
0
I'm running XP64bit I like it a lot. The cool thing is the responsiveness of everything is so fast. Everything 32bits works so far except my Daemon Tools and few other I can dual boot.

What's important is that 64bits gives programmers more precision and bigger registers to work with to get more instructions calculated per clock than 32bits. This is a pretty big advantage.

We won't see this really exploited until games with native 64bit code shows up. Right now this is just a teaser of what more bits can give you right away.
 

Bar81

Banned
Mar 25, 2004
1,835
0
0
What I think FarCry 64 shows most impressively is that game detail can be upgraded with a resulting 0% performance loss over its less detailed 32-bit counterpart. That in and of itself is something gamers should be excited about.
 

T9D

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2001
5,320
6
0
Originally posted by: Bar81
What I think FarCry 64 shows most impressively is that game detail can be upgraded with a resulting 0% performance loss over its less detailed 32-bit counterpart. That in and of itself is something gamers should be excited about.

Unless they just used all that time optomizing the original game code. Can pretty much take any 32 bit game and optimize it to get the same preformance results. I'm not down talking 64 bit but it's something to consider as far as this game goes.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,741
456
126
My comp. magazine did a review on this. They reviewed on Winxp and the 64bit version. Sounded to me they were a little disappointed in how little performance boost they got. Does everybody here say it's worth downloading the patch?