AnitaPeterson
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I hope and pray that his acknowledgement that "some sort of intelligence or first cause" created the universe will someday lead to a saving faith in the one true God.
Ya Cthulhu fthagn!
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I hope and pray that his acknowledgement that "some sort of intelligence or first cause" created the universe will someday lead to a saving faith in the one true God.
That's pretty much where I am now. It's not rational to discount evolution and science, and yet I don't believe that they discount some of the theological viewpoints. This is, in some ways, a "have your cake and eat it too" viewpoint, but I think both can be valid at the same time. I've read a book that does a surprisingly good job of rationally "proving" the existence of God. It doesn't like blind followers of faith any more than those who blindly abhor it.Who's to say that 'something else' didn't start the big bang/creation, and then evenything after that happened the way science explains it? That still leaves room for evolution and other theories.
Originally posted by: Eli
It should include such basic things as "do to others as you want done to you". Very good universal rule.
Originally posted by: rpc64
Originally posted by: Eli
It should include such basic things as "do to others as you want done to you". Very good universal rule.
I find it interesting that you mention this as a good universal rule. You know that is from the bible right? I mean no offense or anything, just thought that was interesting.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
That's pretty much where I am now. It's not rational to discount evolution and science, and yet I don't believe that they discount some of the theological viewpoints. This is, in some ways, a "have your cake and eat it too" viewpoint, but I think both can be valid at the same time. I've read a book that does a surprisingly good job of rationally "proving" the existence of God. It doesn't like blind followers of faith any more than those who blindly abhor it.Who's to say that 'something else' didn't start the big bang/creation, and then evenything after that happened the way science explains it? That still leaves room for evolution and other theories.
I'd like to hear about the god particle ;0
Originally posted by: rpc64
Originally posted by: Skoorb
That's pretty much where I am now. It's not rational to discount evolution and science, and yet I don't believe that they discount some of the theological viewpoints. This is, in some ways, a "have your cake and eat it too" viewpoint, but I think both can be valid at the same time. I've read a book that does a surprisingly good job of rationally "proving" the existence of God. It doesn't like blind followers of faith any more than those who blindly abhor it.Who's to say that 'something else' didn't start the big bang/creation, and then evenything after that happened the way science explains it? That still leaves room for evolution and other theories.
I'd like to hear about the god particle ;0
I would recommend anyone that's interested in this stuff to read "Angles and Demons" by Dan Brown. It's a novel, but it's based on factual information. I found the science versus religion theme of the book to be completely fascinating. It really made me start thinking about these things.
Oh yes, of course I realize where it is from.Originally posted by: rpc64
Originally posted by: Eli
It should include such basic things as "do to others as you want done to you". Very good universal rule.
I find it interesting that you mention this as a good universal rule. You know that is from the bible right? I mean no offense or anything, just thought that was interesting.
Originally posted by: Mo0o
OMG THANKS FOR THE INFO IM GOING TO BE CHRISTIAN NOW
PS. overbearing christians like you make me glad to be agnostic
Originally posted by: SofaKing
Originally posted by: Mo0o
overbearing christians like you make me glad to be agnostic