Angry Irishman
Golden Member
- Jan 25, 2010
- 1,883
- 1
- 81
And that argument has validity. Both sides are making this about something it's not. Mass shootings are a small fraction of gun related deaths in this nation. The banning high capacity magazines idea is a knee jerk reaction. The debate needs to focus on decreasing gun violence in general. And there are very easy ideas out there to do that. Universal background checks should be the first step focused on, accountability of gun resellers should be another (a study released in 2000 showed that approximately 60% of illegal guns traced back to 1% of gun dealers), actually letting the ATF enforce laws ... The Daily Show had a good bit a few weeks back on how neutered the ATF is thanks to the NRA lobby.
Now the assault weapons ban is an interesting one. Once the ban was lifted, assault weapons did start to show up more in crimes and when the ban was in effect assault weapons did decrease in frequency of use in crime. However it is still a small percentage of crimes they were used in and it didn't actually decrease in crime, just what was used was different.
80+% of Americans want change (I don't think that's supported)....what does that even mean? It just gives your government the ability to further strip liberties without following the law...all under the vale of emotion. Bottom line, if the second amendment isn't valid change the amendment. How? through the legal process and not the twist a plainly written amendment of the Constitution means of making that happen. Start voting....get it done through your representation. Guess what? Your representation could give a shit what you want. Bottom line, if the amendment is changed in any other manner then it's stripping rights and illegal. I don't give a shit if the President states this requires "immediate action" and it's for our own good. He can surround himslef on a stage with children and prey on Americans emotions...I don't buy it. Our children will be better served to have rights in the future and a government that logically deals with issues rather than emotionally while upholding those rights provided by the Constitution.