Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Interesting...Although Moore's narration ranges from outrage to sarcasm, the most devastating passage in the film speaks for itself. That's when Bush, who was reading My Pet Goat to a classroom of Florida children, is notified of the second attack on the World Trade Center, and yet lingers with the kids for almost seven minutes before finally leaving the room. His inexplicable paralysis wasn't underlined in news reports at the time, and only Moore thought to contact the teacher in that schoolroom -- who, as it turned out, had made her own video of the visit. The expression on Bush's face as he sits there is odd indeed.
yeah, i want to see this:
"And he makes good use of candid footage, including an eerie video showing Bush practicing facial expressions before going live with his address to the nation about 9/11." -from the Ebert review
Originally posted by: Mwilding
It's not plausable that Ebert is an industry whore?Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Ebert gets more cheese on the back end than any critic in history. To think his views are insightful is laughable. He is a well packaged marketing whore.
at least he gives plausable examples of his assertions, which is more than can be said about yourself.
First of all, what language is that? It certainly isn't English...Originally posted by: 0roo0roohis integrity is not in question when based on evidence.
its not plausible your a martian?
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Interesting...Although Moore's narration ranges from outrage to sarcasm, the most devastating passage in the film speaks for itself. That's when Bush, who was reading My Pet Goat to a classroom of Florida children, is notified of the second attack on the World Trade Center, and yet lingers with the kids for almost seven minutes before finally leaving the room. His inexplicable paralysis wasn't underlined in news reports at the time, and only Moore thought to contact the teacher in that schoolroom -- who, as it turned out, had made her own video of the visit. The expression on Bush's face as he sits there is odd indeed.
yeah, i want to see this:
"And he makes good use of candid footage, including an eerie video showing Bush practicing facial expressions before going live with his address to the nation about 9/11." -from the Ebert review
Like every President doesn't practice before going live on the air. Of course they do. So he shows Bush doing it and it looks crazy, but we don't have the video of Clinton doing it.
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Interesting...Although Moore's narration ranges from outrage to sarcasm, the most devastating passage in the film speaks for itself. That's when Bush, who was reading My Pet Goat to a classroom of Florida children, is notified of the second attack on the World Trade Center, and yet lingers with the kids for almost seven minutes before finally leaving the room. His inexplicable paralysis wasn't underlined in news reports at the time, and only Moore thought to contact the teacher in that schoolroom -- who, as it turned out, had made her own video of the visit. The expression on Bush's face as he sits there is odd indeed.
yeah, i want to see this:
"And he makes good use of candid footage, including an eerie video showing Bush practicing facial expressions before going live with his address to the nation about 9/11." -from the Ebert review
Originally posted by: NFS4
DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN. I'm DEFINITELY gonnna see this now. When does it come out?
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Interesting...Although Moore's narration ranges from outrage to sarcasm, the most devastating passage in the film speaks for itself. That's when Bush, who was reading My Pet Goat to a classroom of Florida children, is notified of the second attack on the World Trade Center, and yet lingers with the kids for almost seven minutes before finally leaving the room. His inexplicable paralysis wasn't underlined in news reports at the time, and only Moore thought to contact the teacher in that schoolroom -- who, as it turned out, had made her own video of the visit. The expression on Bush's face as he sits there is odd indeed.
yeah, i want to see this:
"And he makes good use of candid footage, including an eerie video showing Bush practicing facial expressions before going live with his address to the nation about 9/11." -from the Ebert review
DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN. I'm DEFINITELY gonnna see this now. When does it come out?
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Interesting...Although Moore's narration ranges from outrage to sarcasm, the most devastating passage in the film speaks for itself. That's when Bush, who was reading My Pet Goat to a classroom of Florida children, is notified of the second attack on the World Trade Center, and yet lingers with the kids for almost seven minutes before finally leaving the room. His inexplicable paralysis wasn't underlined in news reports at the time, and only Moore thought to contact the teacher in that schoolroom -- who, as it turned out, had made her own video of the visit. The expression on Bush's face as he sits there is odd indeed.
yeah, i want to see this:
"And he makes good use of candid footage, including an eerie video showing Bush practicing facial expressions before going live with his address to the nation about 9/11." -from the Ebert review
DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN. I'm DEFINITELY gonnna see this now. When does it come out?
Friday, I heard on 850 screens, so most likely it is playing somewhere near you.
Originally posted by: TheShiz
I'm sure they do, i'd like to see Clinton's too!
Terribly sorry to hear thatOriginally posted by: NFS4
Cool. I might have to go see this one by myself. My GF is away, and my roommates are Bush lovers.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Cool. I might have to go see this one by myself. My GF is away, and my roommates are Bush lovers.
Originally posted by: rh71
This is just a documentary ? Bah. I don't pay $10 to see story-telling... I want to be entertained.
But he's a republican. He HAS to be better than ANY democrat!Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: NFS4
Cool. I might have to go see this one by myself. My GF is away, and my roommates are Bush lovers.
i dont understand how anyone can love bush. i mean, if not anything else, the man cant speak! i think being able to speak properly and eloquently is one quality any leader should have.
he might be a nice guy, might be a caring husband and father...but he's simply not a good president
Originally posted by: Skoorb
But he's a republican. He HAS to be better than ANY democrat!Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: NFS4
Cool. I might have to go see this one by myself. My GF is away, and my roommates are Bush lovers.
i dont understand how anyone can love bush. i mean, if not anything else, the man cant speak! i think being able to speak properly and eloquently is one quality any leader should have.
he might be a nice guy, might be a caring husband and father...but he's simply not a good president
Originally posted by: Skoorb
People love a good ad hominem attack, don't they?
Fact is that Ebert in his review made little in the way of opinions and just reflected what the movie had.
Originally posted by: pyonir
I put as much weight in a review from Ebert (or any "movie critic") as i do anyone here.
Hush it you canyuck! :|Originally posted by: Skoorb
But he's a republican. He HAS to be better than ANY democrat!Originally posted by: Aharami
i dont understand how anyone can love bush. i mean, if not anything else, the man cant speak! i think being able to speak properly and eloquently is one quality any leader should have.Originally posted by: NFS4
Cool. I might have to go see this one by myself. My GF is away, and my roommates are Bush lovers.
he might be a nice guy, might be a caring husband and father...but he's simply not a good president
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
Originally posted by: TheShiz
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
Ok, so you like bias on the other side. There is no neutral party.
notice the only other review thread about this movie is a blatent bash of the film. I would argue that Ebert's review is much more neutral, notice how at the bottom he talks about Bowling for Columbine and some of the problems that film had.
And the movie(and the review) is a far more blatant bash of Bush.
oh, so you've seen it?
Hmm...I'd tend to think otherwise, as I've learned that many people haven't even seen the films they commentate on. At least reviewers do.Originally posted by: Electric AmishAmen Brotha!Originally posted by: pyonir
I put as much weight in a review from Ebert (or any "movie critic") as i do anyone here.
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Ebert gave 'Bring it On' a thumbs up! HE KNOWS HIS MOVIES!
