Fact Check: McCain's 'closing argument'

Feb 16, 2005
14,079
5,450
136
Just some more of the same misleading and blatant lies with just enough truth thrown in to make it believable by our fine senator from AZ.

The Statement
Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain, during a speech on October 16 outside Philadelphia, recounted the story of "Joe the Plumber," a man who held a conversation with Democratic candidate Sen. Barack Obama and who became the surprise star of the candidates' October 15 debate when McCain gave an account of the story. McCain said the man told Obama, "'Look, I've been working all my life ? 10, 12 hours. I want to buy the business I'm in, but you're going to raise my taxes.' And you know what Senator Obama had to say to Joe? He wanted to spread his wealth around. He wanted to spread his wealth around."
The Verdict:
Misleading. McCain's remark was an oversimplification of a five-minute-long conversation. Obama replied in great detail about his tax plan, and the "spread the wealth" remark was one small part of the conversation.

The statement:
At a campaign stop Monday in Columbus, Ohio, Sen. John McCain said Sen. Barack Obama "has proposed more than $860 billion in new spending."
Verdict:
Misleading. The figure McCain gave is based on his campaign's tally of the costs of numerous programs Obama has discussed, but ignores the savings from other policy changes Obama is calling for.

The Statement:
Speaking during a campaign stop Monday, Oct. 20 in Belton, Missouri, Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain criticized Democratic opponent Sen. Barack Obama's proposals on taxes. "The Obama tax increase would come at the worst possible time for America, and especially for small businesses like the one Joe dreams of owning," McCain said. "The small businesses Senator Obama would tax provide 16 million jobs in America."
The Verdict:
False. McCain uses an overly broad interpretation of the NFIB survey's figures ? applying Obama's tax plan to those figures in a way that is highly unlikely to match reality.

The Statement:
In an interview on Fox News' "Hannity & Colmes" on Wednesday, October 8, Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain repeated his assertion that Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama's tax plan "raises taxes on small business income."
The Verdict:
Misleading. While Obama's plan would increase taxes for an undetermined number of small business owners who pay their taxes through personal income tax and whose incomes exceed $200,000, it would not establish across-the-board tax increases for all small businesses


The Statement:
"First of all, Sen. Obama wants to raise taxes," McCain said in an interview on CNN's "American Morning" on Tuesday, Sept. 16. "I'm not going to raise anybody's taxes ? ."

Verdict:
TRUE, BUT INCOMPLETE

The Statement
Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain, speaking at the Wednesday, Oct. 15, debate at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, repeated a charge that his Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama, voted to raise taxes. "He voted twice for a budget resolution that increases the taxes on individuals making $42,000 a year," McCain said.
Verdict:
Misleading

The Statement
Speaking at a campaign event Wednesday, October 22, in Cincinnati, Ohio, Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain criticized the tax plan of his Democratic opponent, Sen. Barack Obama. "And by the way, this week we learned that Senator Obama is concerned that his plan is seen as welfare so he just added a work requirement," McCain said. "Thirteen days to go in the election and he changed his tax plan ? ."
The Verdict:
True.

The Statement
Speaking on Fox News's "Hannity & Colmes," Republican vice-presidential candidate Gov. Sarah Palin expanded a GOP attack that Democratic candidate Sen. Barack Obama's running mate said his presidency would invite international trouble. "And it wasn't just Biden making that comment," Palin said. "That was confirmed by former Secretary Madeleine Albright, where she said yes, she believes that Biden was just stating fact. Now, I don't want a president who invites that kind of testing."
The Verdict:
Misleading. Palin takes out of context part of a comment by Albright, who was actually praising Obama's ability to handle a crisis

The Statement:
At a debate Friday, Sept. 26, in Oxford, Mississippi, Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain attacked Democratic rival Sen. Barack Obama's stance on the "surge" of troops in Iraq. "Senator Obama said the surge could not work, said it would increase sectarian violence, said it was doomed to failure," McCain said. "Recently on a television program, he said it exceeded our wildest expectations."
The Verdict:
True, but incomplete. While acknowledging the surge's military success, Obama says the political goals it was meant to secure have not been met.

The Statement:
Sen. Joe Biden said at the Oct. 2 vice presidential debate that "our commanding general in Afghanistan said the surge principle in Iraq will not work in Afghanistan."
The Verdict:
True.

The Statement
Sen. John McCain, in a speech on September 21 to the National Guard Association of the United States, spoke about Iraq, citing his support of the "surge" and the strides it has fostered in the war. In the address, McCain repeated a statement that he made elsewhere that "victory in Iraq is finally in sight."
Verdict:
In Dispute. McCain, elated by Iraq strides, sees "victory in sight."
Top commanders and officials see great progress, but warn that hard-won
gains could easily be reversed
.

The Statement:
Gov. Sarah Palin said at the October 2 vice presidential debate that Sen. Barack Obama "would be willing to meet with" Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad "without preconditions being met first."
Verdict:
Misleading. Obama has said that he is willing to meet with Iranian leaders, and that such a meeting "could include" Ahmadinejad. However, he has also specified that he does not consider Ahmadinejad to be Iran's most important leader, and he has not said directly that he would be willing to meet with the current Iranian president.

The Statement
Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, speaking at a rally on October 21 in Bensalem, Pennsylvania, criticized Democratic opponent Sen. Barack Obama's foreign policy judgment. "We've seen the wrong response from him over and over during this campaign. ? When Russia invaded Georgia, Sen. Obama said the invaded country should show restraint."
The Verdict:
Misleading. When the fighting erupted, Obama initially said both countries ? not just Georgia ? should "show restraint." But as facts emerged about Russia's actions, Obama's statements shifted to criticizing Russia

The Statement
In a campaign speech Wednesday, October 8, in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain questioned Democratic opponent Sen. Barack Obama's foresight on the role of the troubled subprime lending sector in the recent financial crisis. "As recently as September of last year, he said that subprime loans had been ? quote ? 'a good idea,' " McCain said.
The Verdict:
Misleading.Obama did say subprime lending "started off as a good idea," but he was criticizing abuses in the sector. Based on his statements, he did not think they were a good idea last September, as McCain suggests.

The Statement
Sen. Barack Obama said at the Oct. 15 debate at Hofstra University that Republican opponent John McCain's plan to stem the mortgage meltdown "could be a giveaway to banks if we're buying full price for mortgages that now are worth a lot less. And we don't want to waste taxpayer money."
The Verdict:
True. The McCain campaign acknowledges the plan would shift the burden to taxpayers


The Statement:
At a campaign stop Friday, October 17, in Miami, Florida, Sen. John McCain said, "If I'm elected president, I won't make it harder to sell our goods overseas ? as Sen. Obama proposes. I'll open new markets to goods made in America and make sure our trade is free and fair."
The Verdict:
True, but incomplete. Obama's opposition to certain free trade agreements would make it harder for some U.S. exporters to sell their products, but only in some countries covered by those deals.

The Statement
In a television ad titled "New Energy" that was released in July but continues to run in swing states and on national cable networks, Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama's campaign says Republican rival Sen. John McCain and President Bush "support a drilling plan that won't produce a drop of oil for seven years."
The Verdict:
True. A federal economist says Obama's timeline is generally accurate.


The Statement
Republican vice-presidential candidate Gov. Sarah Palin, in an interview taped Oct. 8 and aired Sunday, Oct. 12, on Fox News' "Hannity's America," referred to Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama's stance on offshore High drilling and "clean-coal" technology. "That was kind of perplexing last night, listening to Barack Obama's position all of a sudden saying 'yay' to clean coal and perhaps 'yay' to offshore," she said. Palin said he's "so on record as having opposed" those technologies.
The Verdict:
False. Obama long has supported clean coal technology and more recently changed his stance on offshore oil drilling ? two months before the Oct. 7 debate referenced by Palin.

The Statement:
At a town hall meeting Wednesday in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Sen. John McCain repeated a standard line from his stump speech in support of nuclear power, telling voters that it's "clean and it's safe and we can recycle ? excuse me ? reprocess and we can store. My opponent is against nuclear power. ? "
Verdict:
False

The Statement:
In a set of radio ads aired Tuesday, September 30 in several battleground states, Republican Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign says Democratic opponent Sen. Barack Obama and his running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, are against "clean coal" technology. In "Clean Coal Colorado" a narrator says, "Obama-Biden and their liberal allies oppose clean coal. Listen to Joe Biden ? 'No coal plants here in America.' 'We're not supporting clean coal.'"
The Verdict:
Misleading. The partial Biden quotes that the ads use are accurate, but leave out the full context of his comments. The Obama campaign supports "clean coal" technology and building plants using the new technology.
.......................................................................................
For those of you keeping score at home
Misleading 9
True, but... 3
100% True 2
False 5*
*And 2 statements underlined are by either Senator Obama or Biden, and McCain uses these as talking points but he's flat out wrong, so I believe those would count as false.

So there you have it. 19 talking points and only 2 that are 100% true, how pathetic is that?

I just went over Senator Obamas closing speech and I got
100% True 6
Misleading 5
True, but... 2
False 3
So of the 16 points they chose to fact check 6 were 100% true, quite a bit higher percentage wise. I am not naive, I know all/most politicians lie to some level to get into office, but when only 15% of your closing points are true it's very clear why you feel the need to go negative.

d'oh! Forget the linkage
insert air quotes here

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,736
6,759
126
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,079
5,450
136
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

If you would have asked me before 2000 does John McCain have integrity, I would have said yes, without question, but the past 8 years have proven that completely wrong. A shame.
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

Seems to me all they are doing is giving that ill prepared juinor senator a free pass. He committed to taking public financing, then failed to keep his word. If handling the truth is the same as ignoring his lies congrats to you.....


Comparing McCain to Bush? Wow, you just lap up that ObamaAId. McCain would close Gitmo, he also feels the GOP should return to being the party of environmental conservationism.

Show me two issues where Obama significantly differs from the official Democratic platform or any of the other viable candidates he beat in the primaries. There are none, he is just the torch bearer, no more or less a party puppet than Bush. He followed the party line on the anti-surge sentiment, displaying poor judgement in an area he really has NO experience.


"Change doesn't come from Washington, it comes to Washington" He is from Washington, been in power for two years and done NOTHING. Dems should have used that power and made it possible for Bill to run again, he would have gotten my vote....
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

If you would have asked me before 2000 does John McCain have integrity, I would have said yes, without question, but the past 8 years have proven that completely wrong. A shame.

I would like one significant example over the last 8 years that shows McCain has lost his credibility. I will offer Obama's flop on public financing as one example of his proven record of showing zero integrity.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
IS anyone surprised by this? facts have been the McCain campaign's main enemy this past 3 months. They have no clear message of thier own, and must attack with false accusations and "Stretches" of half truths to even have a chance at this election.

This is FUD at its best, and it worked the past couple of elections... Fortunately it looks like the majority of the country is finally aware of the tactic and isnt so gullible anymore.
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Obama has been given a free pass on just about everything. The man can't even keep his word about financing his campaign yet everything he says is hailed as gospel.

"Its kind of sad how people see things the way that want to see them"

I agree, bless your heart anyways....
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

If you would have asked me before 2000 does John McCain have integrity, I would have said yes, without question, but the past 8 years have proven that completely wrong. A shame.

I would like one significant example over the last 8 years that shows McCain has lost his credibility. I will offer Obama's flop on public financing as one example of his proven record of showing zero integrity.

Bush's tax cut. He against it before he was for it.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,870
10,222
136
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

If you would have asked me before 2000 does John McCain have integrity, I would have said yes, without question, but the past 8 years have proven that completely wrong. A shame.

I would like one significant example over the last 8 years that shows McCain has lost his credibility. I will offer Obama's flop on public financing as one example of his proven record of showing zero integrity.
Obama's reneging on his commitment to accept public financing when it became apparent that he would have a considerable advantage if he instead accepted private financing is only evidence that he is willing to abandon a promise. It's not indicative of integrity, but it's not the kind of blemish that John McCain has stained himself with again and again and again until it's just a sick stew of lies coming from his camp. At least what Obama did here is out in the open, plain and there's nothing he's hiding from. As far as I'm concerned, the fact that he's attracted a lot of financing indicates that people believe in him. You may think that he's sold his soul, but it doesn't appear to me that way. It's clear to me that he has infinitely more chance of putting America on the recovery path than McCain.

 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

...says the moron who has been conned into believing McCain is the same as Bush :roll::roll::roll:
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

If you would have asked me before 2000 does John McCain have integrity, I would have said yes, without question, but the past 8 years have proven that completely wrong. A shame.

I would like one significant example over the last 8 years that shows McCain has lost his credibility. I will offer Obama's flop on public financing as one example of his proven record of showing zero integrity.

Bush's tax cut. He against it before he was for it.


Voted against them and his party 4 times before finally capitulating. Only way he could get the nomination, of course he could change them after he became elected.

In 2001, Sen. McCain argued, "I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief."

His voting record backs up that stated belief.


He also "did much more than just criticize the Bush tax cuts--he also joined leading liberal senators in offering and voting for amendments designed to undermine them. All in all, he voted on the pro-tax side of 14 such amendments in 2001 and 2003. These included an amendment he co-sponsored with Sen. Tom Daschle to limit the rate reduction in the top tax bracket to one percentage point and an amendment sponsored by Sen. Russ Feingold against full repeal of the estate tax, aka the death tax. This latter vote is in keeping with Senator McCain's 2002 vote against repealing the death tax."



How many times did Obama vote against his party? He has no record of doing anything significant, either in step with or standing up to his party.

Have the Democrats, in power as we speak, repealed those Bush tax cuts?
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

If you would have asked me before 2000 does John McCain have integrity, I would have said yes, without question, but the past 8 years have proven that completely wrong. A shame.

I would like one significant example over the last 8 years that shows McCain has lost his credibility. I will offer Obama's flop on public financing as one example of his proven record of showing zero integrity.

Bush's tax cut. He against it before he was for it.


Voted against them and his party 4 times before finally capitulating. Only way he could get the nomination, of course he could change them after he became elected.

In 2001, Sen. McCain argued, "I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief."

His voting record backs up that stated belief.


He also "did much more than just criticize the Bush tax cuts--he also joined leading liberal senators in offering and voting for amendments designed to undermine them. All in all, he voted on the pro-tax side of 14 such amendments in 2001 and 2003. These included an amendment he co-sponsored with Sen. Tom Daschle to limit the rate reduction in the top tax bracket to one percentage point and an amendment sponsored by Sen. Russ Feingold against full repeal of the estate tax, aka the death tax. This latter vote is in keeping with Senator McCain's 2002 vote against repealing the death tax."



How many times did Obama vote against his party? He has no record of doing anything significant, either in step with or standing up to his party.

Have the Democrats, in power as we speak, repealed those Bush tax cuts?

:laugh:You wanted an example and got it but you still make excuses for McCain. Pathetic.
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: Muse
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

If you would have asked me before 2000 does John McCain have integrity, I would have said yes, without question, but the past 8 years have proven that completely wrong. A shame.

I would like one significant example over the last 8 years that shows McCain has lost his credibility. I will offer Obama's flop on public financing as one example of his proven record of showing zero integrity.
Obama's reneging on his commitment to accept public financing when it became apparent that he would have a considerable advantage if he instead accepted private financing is only evidence that he is willing to abandon a promise. It's not indicative of integrity, but it's not the kind of blemish that John McCain has stained himself with again and again and again until it's just a sick stew of lies coming from his camp. At least what Obama did here is out in the open, plain and there's nothing he's hiding from. As far as I'm concerned, the fact that he's attracted a lot of financing indicates that people believe in him. You may think that he's sold his soul, but it doesn't appear to me that way. It's clear to me that he has infinitely more chance of putting America on the recovery path than McCain.

At least you understand he has no qualms making promises purely for political positioning and that his actions might be completely opposite. McCain has a far longer, proven record of integrity.

Obama's economic plan is horrible, raise taxes on business, raise capital gains taxes, and increase deficit spending. At least McCain understands the need for fiscal responsibility, reduction of government, and has stated a balanced budget would be a reachable goal.

 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Alistar7
At least McCain understands the need for fiscal responsibility, reduction of government, and has stated a balanced budget would be a reachable goal.

Gee... when has a Republican candidate for President said that one before?
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

If you would have asked me before 2000 does John McCain have integrity, I would have said yes, without question, but the past 8 years have proven that completely wrong. A shame.

I would like one significant example over the last 8 years that shows McCain has lost his credibility. I will offer Obama's flop on public financing as one example of his proven record of showing zero integrity.

Bush's tax cut. He against it before he was for it.


Voted against them and his party 4 times before finally capitulating. Only way he could get the nomination, of course he could change them after he became elected.

In 2001, Sen. McCain argued, "I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief."

His voting record backs up that stated belief.


He also "did much more than just criticize the Bush tax cuts--he also joined leading liberal senators in offering and voting for amendments designed to undermine them. All in all, he voted on the pro-tax side of 14 such amendments in 2001 and 2003. These included an amendment he co-sponsored with Sen. Tom Daschle to limit the rate reduction in the top tax bracket to one percentage point and an amendment sponsored by Sen. Russ Feingold against full repeal of the estate tax, aka the death tax. This latter vote is in keeping with Senator McCain's 2002 vote against repealing the death tax."



How many times did Obama vote against his party? He has no record of doing anything significant, either in step with or standing up to his party.

Have the Democrats, in power as we speak, repealed those Bush tax cuts?

:laugh:You wanted an example and got it but you still make excuses for McCain. Pathetic.

One vote compared to 15+ other votes over 8 years, where do you think his personal policy falls compared to his party?

We know where Obama falls, lock in step with whatever way the dems vote. We also know he will make promises and break them if it helps his political position. From here both look the same in some regards, yet you only see the negative when it applies to McCain, pathetic.

A shame we can't vote for Bill again, even worse the Dems/GOP didn't continue his responsible fiscal policy....
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Alistar7
At least McCain understands the need for fiscal responsibility, reduction of government, and has stated a balanced budget would be a reachable goal.

Gee... when has a Republican candidate for President said that one before?

I agree, both partys trump out candidates that say whatever is needed to win while carrying the party torch. Once in power they often do the exact opposite, as is the case during the last few GOP administrations.

McCain has a far better record of being independent of his party than Obama. His personal stance on ear mark spending is one reason I think he will legitimately address those pressing issues rather than merely using them as campagin fodder ala Reagan, Bush I & II.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Alistar7
At least McCain understands the need for fiscal responsibility, reduction of government, and has stated a balanced budget would be a reachable goal.

Gee... when has a Republican candidate for President said that one before?

I agree, both partys trump out candidates that say whatever is needed to win while carrying the party torch. Once in power they often do the exact opposite, as is the case during the last few GOP administrations.

McCain has a far better record of being independent of his party than Obama. His personal stance on ear mark spending is one reason I think he will legitimately address those pressing issues rather than merely using them as campagin fodder ala Reagan, Bush I & II.

McCain's "Maverick" record is about being a gadfly and a big government moderate. This small govt bit is something he never adopted before hitting the campaign trail this year.

Put down the koolaid.
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Alistar7
At least McCain understands the need for fiscal responsibility, reduction of government, and has stated a balanced budget would be a reachable goal.

Gee... when has a Republican candidate for President said that one before?

I agree, both partys trump out candidates that say whatever is needed to win while carrying the party torch. Once in power they often do the exact opposite, as is the case during the last few GOP administrations.

McCain has a far better record of being independent of his party than Obama. His personal stance on ear mark spending is one reason I think he will legitimately address those pressing issues rather than merely using them as campagin fodder ala Reagan, Bush I & II.

McCain's "Maverick" record is about being a gadfly and a big government moderate. This small govt bit is something he never adopted before hitting the campaign trail this year.

Put down the koolaid.

Good advice, maybe you should.


http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1559485/posts


Posted on Tuesday, January 17, 2006

SPARTANBURG, South Carolina (Reuters) - Republican Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), back in the state where a bruising primary loss crippled his 2000 White House bid, said on Monday his party had "lost our way" on spending and needed to clean up widespread influence-peddling and lobbying abuses.

But he said the federal budget had spiraled out of control under Republican leadership. He called for tighter restrictions on earmarking -- the congressional practice of inserting local projects in spending bills -- and tighter controls on lobbyists in Washington."

 

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
12,130
749
126
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

...says the moron who has been conned into believing McCain is the same as Bush :roll::roll::roll:

says the moron who belives that mccain (of this election) isn't the same as bush
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

...says the moron who has been conned into believing McCain is the same as Bush :roll::roll::roll:

says the moron who belives that mccain (of this election) isn't the same as bush

Bush is a moron, and a coward. On those two points alone they are polar opposites. Issue wise, Gitmo, climate change, target of tax cuts, government spending.....

How is Obama different than the Dems that have been in power the last two years and done....., er, what have they done?
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,870
10,222
136
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Muse
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

If you would have asked me before 2000 does John McCain have integrity, I would have said yes, without question, but the past 8 years have proven that completely wrong. A shame.

I would like one significant example over the last 8 years that shows McCain has lost his credibility. I will offer Obama's flop on public financing as one example of his proven record of showing zero integrity.
Obama's reneging on his commitment to accept public financing when it became apparent that he would have a considerable advantage if he instead accepted private financing is only evidence that he is willing to abandon a promise. It's not indicative of integrity, but it's not the kind of blemish that John McCain has stained himself with again and again and again until it's just a sick stew of lies coming from his camp. At least what Obama did here is out in the open, plain and there's nothing he's hiding from. As far as I'm concerned, the fact that he's attracted a lot of financing indicates that people believe in him. You may think that he's sold his soul, but it doesn't appear to me that way. It's clear to me that he has infinitely more chance of putting America on the recovery path than McCain.

At least you understand he has no qualms making promises purely for political positioning and that his actions might be completely opposite. McCain has a far longer, proven record of integrity.

Obama's economic plan is horrible, raise taxes on business, raise capital gains taxes, and increase deficit spending. At least McCain understands the need for fiscal responsibility, reduction of government, and has stated a balanced budget would be a reachable goal.

I wrote a long rebuttal to this, but it was lost. Screw it. Arguing with you is useless, the blinders are already on.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Vic, do you agree our deficit spending is a problem?

:confused:

You're asking me this after I've already argued exactly that?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Alistar7
At least McCain understands the need for fiscal responsibility, reduction of government, and has stated a balanced budget would be a reachable goal.

Gee... when has a Republican candidate for President said that one before?

I agree, both partys trump out candidates that say whatever is needed to win while carrying the party torch. Once in power they often do the exact opposite, as is the case during the last few GOP administrations.

McCain has a far better record of being independent of his party than Obama. His personal stance on ear mark spending is one reason I think he will legitimately address those pressing issues rather than merely using them as campagin fodder ala Reagan, Bush I & II.

McCain's "Maverick" record is about being a gadfly and a big government moderate. This small govt bit is something he never adopted before hitting the campaign trail this year.

Put down the koolaid.

Good advice, maybe you should.


http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1559485/posts


Posted on Tuesday, January 17, 2006

SPARTANBURG, South Carolina (Reuters) - Republican Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), back in the state where a bruising primary loss crippled his 2000 White House bid, said on Monday his party had "lost our way" on spending and needed to clean up widespread influence-peddling and lobbying abuses.

But he said the federal budget had spiraled out of control under Republican leadership. He called for tighter restrictions on earmarking -- the congressional practice of inserting local projects in spending bills -- and tighter controls on lobbyists in Washington."

Which is why he picked the Queen of Earmarks as his running mate, right?

There's a well-known saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
How do we apply this to people like you who insist on being fooled with the same old bullshit dozens of times over and over again?
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama can simply afford to be more truthful than McSame because McSame is going for the moron vote who couldn't tell a lie from their own ass.

The far more intelligent and advanced Democrats are far more able to handle the truth.

...says the moron who has been conned into believing McCain is the same as Bush :roll::roll::roll:

so, whats the difference? all i can think of is anwar