- Jun 14, 2003
- 10,442
- 0
- 0
i searched...didnt find a topic so here goes
for those that seen the race today you will of seen what happened to kimi. after flat spotting his right front tyre (and being unable to change them because of the rule regarding tyres), the subsequent vibrations casued by driving fast with what basically amounts to a wheel thats no longer circular caused his suspension to fail specatularly under braking on the final lap
ITV got a pretty cool slow mo of it, I MUST FIND IT!
he narrowly avoided wiping out takuma sato in the process too.
now, do you think it was the rules fault, or Mclaren's fault for keeping him out? the tyre can be changed if it is deemed unsafe, but he would of lost the lead for sure.
did Mclaren put winning above safety? or was it just one of those risks you must take if one wants to succeed?
personally i see it as a risk, a risk Mclaren chose to take. fair enough the tyre was in bad shape and at 160MPH i doubt kimi could even see where he was going due to the vibrations (even the onboard camera shots proved how much vibrations he was getting) but they went for broke and it never paid off. its jus one of those things that happens in racing.
this one tyre rule has definately spiced up the races. most tracks dont really allow for over taking since the risk is too high, its safer to get ahead during pit stops, but thats no fun. Monte Carlo last week was a perfect example of how the one tyre rule brings some excitement to the last 20 laps as it becomes more about driver skill
for those that seen the race today you will of seen what happened to kimi. after flat spotting his right front tyre (and being unable to change them because of the rule regarding tyres), the subsequent vibrations casued by driving fast with what basically amounts to a wheel thats no longer circular caused his suspension to fail specatularly under braking on the final lap
ITV got a pretty cool slow mo of it, I MUST FIND IT!
he narrowly avoided wiping out takuma sato in the process too.
now, do you think it was the rules fault, or Mclaren's fault for keeping him out? the tyre can be changed if it is deemed unsafe, but he would of lost the lead for sure.
did Mclaren put winning above safety? or was it just one of those risks you must take if one wants to succeed?
personally i see it as a risk, a risk Mclaren chose to take. fair enough the tyre was in bad shape and at 160MPH i doubt kimi could even see where he was going due to the vibrations (even the onboard camera shots proved how much vibrations he was getting) but they went for broke and it never paid off. its jus one of those things that happens in racing.
this one tyre rule has definately spiced up the races. most tracks dont really allow for over taking since the risk is too high, its safer to get ahead during pit stops, but thats no fun. Monte Carlo last week was a perfect example of how the one tyre rule brings some excitement to the last 20 laps as it becomes more about driver skill
