Puffnstuff
Lifer
- Mar 9, 2005
- 16,029
- 4,798
- 136
As did the uneducated backwater residents with no moral values.Electoral College voted for Trump.
As did the uneducated backwater residents with no moral values.Electoral College voted for Trump.
Last I checked all of America collectively voted for Trump, that is why he is in the white house. Just like collectively Texas voted for Trump. Gotta give all of the people what the winning segment voted for, right?
Do people actually believe that other people on the internet are Russian Trolls!? Do you realize how crazy that sounds!?
If you have an argument, then present it, otherwise kindly stfu.
Do people actually believe that other people on the internet are Russian Trolls!? Do you realize how crazy that sounds!?
If you have an argument, then present it, otherwise kindly stfu.
I know, I'm giving him crap based on his posts on the other FCC thread. When it doesn't affect him it's burn it down, when it affects him he's against it.Last I checked, America elects Presidents, not kings.
Thank you for contacting me regarding net neutrality.
Since the Clinton administration, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had regulated the broadband industry with a light touch, allowing the Internet to flourish. Unfortunately, the Obama administration’s decision to reclassify broadband service under Title II — its misnamed “Open Internet Order” — broke with bipartisan tradition. This reclassification imposed heavy-handed utility-style regulations on internet services and led to greater government control of the Internet.
This heavy-handed regulation has caused investment in Internet infrastructure to decline. According to the FCC, among the nation’s 12 largest internet service providers, domestic broadband capital expenditures decreased by 5.6 percent, or $3.6 billion, between 2014 and 2016. As the new chairman of the FCC recently explained, “regulations designed for monopoly will push the market further toward monopoly.” This is not what is best for citizens of Wisconsin or the rest of the country.
One of my top priorities is to ensure the expansion of high-speed broadband throughout Wisconsin. On May 18, 2017, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for broadband services that was a welcome development. This action restores the light-touch regulation that allowed for a free and open Internet for nearly 20 years.
Thank you again for contacting my office. It is very helpful to hear the views of the constituents I serve. Please see my website at www.ronjohnson.senate.gov for additional information. It is an honor representing you and all the people of Wisconsin.
Sincerely,
Ron Johnson
United States Senator
So I wrote to senator Ron Johnson about this, here is his CANNED response:
Liars gonna lie. You are not representing me you fucking shitbag, you are representing the CEOs of a few powerful ISPs. Own it.
In ironic news..... India just passed Net Neutrality. This is just another reason why Asia is the future and America is the past.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2ciCW-8AE0
What I’d like to see and it is mostly in the mobile space is a approximate and mostly accurate measure of what “de-prioritized” data speeds are.
Some good prepaid deals out there it’s just unknown what your data speed will be at any given time. Really risky to pay upfront for three months of service and then find out your data is a little faster than dial up for morning & afternoon commutes.
Basically require any ad to give a realistic range as to what data speed will be when you are not priority data.
I agree however a range something like when the network is busy you should get speeds between 200k to 2mb.This would be cool, but I’m not hopeful. Mobile speeds are so variable, it’s a big ask for an ISP to guarantee anything. Even the big vendors can take a stab at it, but it’s not certain :/
I agree however a range something like when the network is busy you should get speeds between 200k to 2mb.
Certainly there is enough data to give a moderate range.
Exactly and that’s why I’d like to know what the reduced speeds would be. I am confident their ultimate goal is sell data at a high speed, throttle is more and more, then sell “high speed data packs” to increase your speed for X dollars and Y amount of data.I would like to know what usage data is being collected, for me it’s often the same towers / locations where there’s problems. You’d think they’d notice!!🤣
What “they” really want is the ability to implement a real pay to play format and gouge the hell out of it.
Exactly and that’s why I’d like to know what the reduced speeds would be. I am confident their ultimate goal is sell data at a high speed, throttle is more and more, then sell “high speed data packs” to increase your speed for X dollars and Y amount of data.
They want pay per use data. That is the ultimate goal.
Tmobile?Iirc, last time I looked at an ISP’s service offering in the details…it was a ridiculously slow connection, like >768Kbps was not degraded. This was Comcast, but same premise really. My connection at that time was like 50/5
What annoys me most about this junk is my anecdote of Verizon. Switched to them 2 years ago and we added priority data to my line. I posed the question to the sales guy: “so what if the majority of people have priority data and we just can’t use it anyways?” He was like “that won’t happen with our 5G!”. Wife looked at me with the “don’t even start” face so I didn’t bother lol.
And that’s been the case occasionally . Get to a crowded area, full service, 5G….yet nothing works until we leave the event.
Tmobile?