• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

[Extremetech] Nvidia’s GameWorks program usurps power from developers, end-users, AMD

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
NTMBK said:
AMD have already said that Mantle could be supported on non-AMD GPUs, so long as they meet the minimum feature set. I hope that Mantle is launching as AMD only while they get it ironed out, and that they will allow NVidia and Intel to implement Mantle drivers in the future.
Click to expand...
They also said it is proprietary with no plans to allow Nvidia to use it. I don't know what to believe, but I do believe if they do allow Nvidia to use it, it wouldn't be any better than this GameWorks program. The structure of it is designed to harness AMD's GCN architecture.
 
AFAIK only the dice guy said that he wants support from more than one vendor.

AMD never said anything in this direction. And without a proper specification and documentation nVidia and Intel cant even start to write their own driver...
 
Surely the differences are obvious?

AMD goes and writes an entire API designed purely to give better performance. Nvidia uses the existing industry standard API and warps it in a way to prevent AMD from ever optimizing games using their libraries.

This cannot logically be defended this while simultaneously slamming Mantle, but I'm sure that won't stop a whole lot of people from trying.
 
I find both features distasteful. I would have rather seen something both companies could equally use. But this is what we have to deal with. Hopefully things stabilize, but I expect a bumpy ride for the next couple years.
 
SiliconWars said:
Surely the differences are obvious?

AMD goes and writes an entire API designed purely to give better performance. Nvidia uses the existing industry standard API and warps it in a way to prevent AMD from ever optimizing games using their libraries.

This cannot logically be defended this while simultaneously slamming Mantle, but I'm sure that won't stop a whole lot of people from trying.
Click to expand...

Now that is spin. Nvidia optimized the drivers for performance as well, but to prevent anyone from looking in to see what they did, AMD doesn't gain those advantages.

The truth is somewhere in between, obviously.
 
I think it's a little sleazy, but it's disingenuous to imply that AMD can't optimize games. I mean cripes, they have the tessellation slider right there in the driver panel. Just turn it down.
 
SiliconWars said:
Surely the differences are obvious?

AMD goes and writes an entire API designed purely to give better performance. Nvidia uses the existing industry standard API and warps it in a way to prevent AMD from ever optimizing games using their libraries.

This cannot logically be defended this while simultaneously slamming Mantle, but I'm sure that won't stop a whole lot of people from trying.
Click to expand...

What a pile of BS. Mantle is an attempt by AMD to control the API, nothing else.
 
Gloomy said:
I think it's a little sleazy, but it's disingenuous to imply that AMD can't optimize games. I mean cripes, they have the tessellation slider right there in the driver panel. Just turn it down.
Click to expand...

This isn't about user experience it's about benchmarking. Nvidia already spent time and money "convincing" the tech press to disallow AMD's tessellation slider.
 
ShintaiDK said:
What a pile of BS. Mantle is an attempt by AMD to control the API, nothing else.
Click to expand...

Yes their own API (which devs have complete access to unlike with Nvidia's libraries). Nvidia is attempting to control the industry standard API that you have been banging on about for the past 3 months.
 
SiliconWars said:
This isn't about user experience it's about benchmarking. Nvidia already spent time and money "convincing" the tech press to disallow AMD's tessellation slider.
Click to expand...

Using the Tessellation slide violates the DX11 specification.
I hope any reviewer knows this.

SiliconWars said:
Yes their own API (which devs have complete access to unlike with Nvidia's libraries). Nvidia is attempting to control the industry standard API that you have been banging on about for the past 3 months.
Click to expand...

You have no clue what you're talking about. Property of the code has nothing to do with an "industry standard API".
 
sontin said:
Using the Tessellation slide violates the DX11 specification.
I hope any reviewer knows this.
Click to expand...
Even if it is, I think the slider is a good feature. It shouldn't be used in benchmarking, but I don't see how it is a bad thing for a user to gain control of their hardware.
 
ShintaiDK said:
No they are not. Its free to use closed libraries. So dont try and spin it into some anti nVidia sensationalism.
Click to expand...

How can it be anything else? By using Nvidia's libraries the game cannot be optimized on AMD hardware, ever. On the industry standard API that you all slammed Mantle for....being better than?

Nowhere is AMD preventing Nvidia from optimizing any game. Until there are Mantle-only games that will be the case.
 
The thread has devolved into two groups of people with negligible proof of anything saying that the other side is wrong because their negligible proof is way better. I can remember when the thread was about enthusiastic discussion about what mantle could mean for the industry. I will never understand the negativity that is being displayed in this thread. If mantle forces Microsoft to get DX fixed it benefits us all. Even if you want amd to fail for whatever reason at least acknowledge that fact and then stop posting your trash in this thread.
 
SiliconWars said:
How can it be anything else? By using Nvidia's libraries the game cannot be optimized on AMD hardware, ever. On the industry standard API that you all slammed Mantle for....being better than?

Nowhere is AMD preventing Nvidia from optimizing any game. Until there are Mantle-only games that will be the case.
Click to expand...

They sure delayed it, as we saw with BF4.

Dont try and glorify AMD, they are just as bad.

AMD got its own closed libraries too. Works fine optimizing for both.
 
Last edited:
SiliconWars said:
And on top of that we have a clear situation where once again, Ubisoft is not allowing AMD to optimize Nvidia's ridiculous levels of over-tessellation.
Click to expand...

It's not Ubisoft, it's Warner Bros Montreal..

Be sure that this level of tessellation is slowing down Nvidia cards for no IQ benefit - it just happens to slow down the AMD cards more for the same no IQ benefit.
Click to expand...
What do you mean no IQ benefit? 🙄 The snow in Batman Arkham Origins is the best implementation to be found in any game. It's fully deformable and varies in depth and geometry. Shadows can also be cast against it.

The same with the cape. It actually has real geometric detail that can interact with the game's shadow and lighting system.
 
If that is the case what is wrong with allowing AMD's optimizations?

AMD attempted to provide Warner Bros. Montreal with code to improve Arkham Origins performance in tessellation, as well as to fix certain multi-GPU problems with the game. The studio turned down both.
Click to expand...
 
It's WB case. If they don't care for AMD's opinion it's their call.
In the end they want to sell as many copies as possible.
 
Why would this be any surprise ? The Batman games might as well be labelled as co-developed by nvidia with the heavy involvement they've always had with them.
 
Nvidia alredy blocking AMD optimizations in DirectX made me think about SteamOS OGL games. Nvidia have more control over OGL than DX so the situation will be even worse in Nvidia titles.
 
VulgarDisplay said:
The thread has devolved into two groups of people with negligible proof of anything saying that the other side is wrong because their negligible proof is way better. I can remember when the thread was about enthusiastic discussion about what mantle could mean for the industry. I will never understand the negativity that is being displayed in this thread. If mantle forces Microsoft to get DX fixed it benefits us all. Even if you want amd to fail for whatever reason at least acknowledge that fact and then stop posting your trash in this thread.
Click to expand...

...

I think you've wandered into the wrong thread.
 
By the way, for people complaining about AMD's Mantle; did nobody notice that this new initiative also promotes "CUDA development tools"? As in, NVidia's proprietary, closed platform, which is fragmenting the market and slowing GPGPU adoption? Which is still entirely closed after 6 years of releases? Seems odd to be damning Mantle for the same reasons before it has even launched yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top