Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Link
This idea that the scientific community is nearly unanimously in agreement on this issue is patently false.
This idea the the serious scientific community is nearly unanimously in agreement on this issue is patently true.
Frederick Seitz, who wrote the cover letter of that petition, was indeed president of the National Academy of Sciences, from 1962 to 1969. The academy quickly disassociated itself from both Dr. Seitz, and the petition after it was circulated.
Text It is clear that Dr. Seitz has a conservative political agenda: he is currently on the Board of Directors of the Geoge C. Marshall Institute
Text.
The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine is not a serious academic institution. Their website's introduction to the petition is preceeded with professional and scientific statements such as "This is the website that completely knocks the wind out of the enviro's sails"
Text. Elsewhere, they offer a website on "Nuclear War Survival Skills"
Text and a homeschool kit so that you may "Teach your children...[as] in the days before socialism in education"
Text whatever that means.
However, if you want to click one link in this post, make it
this one. It lays out the whole issue pretty well. Lots of juicy tidbits in that article, such as:
1) The author of the paper that accompanies the petition, Arthur Robinson (also the founder of OISM), was dismissed by his mentor, Linus Pauling (you might have heard of him), who called Robinson's research "amateurish".
2) The petition and Robinson's paper were bulk-mailed to tens of thousands of U.S. scientists, unsolicited. Per Robert Park, physicist at the University of Maryland: "Virtually every scientist in every field got it".
3) The paper was printed in the same format and typeface as Proceedings of the National Academy of Scientists, however....
4) The paper was never accepted by ANY scientific journal, and in fact never peer reviewed at all.
5) Coauthors on the paper included Zachary Robinson, Arthur's 22-year-old son, with no credentials to speak of, as well as Willie Soon, an aerospace engineer, and Sallie Baliunas, an astrophysicist.
I randomly Googled a few of the Ph.D.s listed in the petition. After about 20 names, I found
one from a serious academic institution, a biologist at the University of Virginia. I also found an employee of ChevronTexaco. As for the rest, Google had no answers for me. I encourage you to try it yourself. It is my personal opinion that the overwhelming majority of the people on the list either do not exist, have no credentials at all, or have irrelevant credentials. If so many of the signers are serious academics, as the OISM contends, they why not post their institution, or at least a city, so that they can be cross-checked?