BonzaiDuck
Lifer
Just in from the mailbox -- Maximum PC August 2005.
Page 73 -- Zalman's advertisement for the CNPS-9500.
I have some observations about this, and there is a review available:
Review of the CNPS-9500
Neither the review nor the advertisement mentions the optimum thermal resistance specification for the heat-pipe cooler.
The advertisement shows a graph of temperature against fan-speed. This appears to be partly "hype", because beyond some given fan-speed and therefore air-flow in CFMs, there will be no improvement in thermal resistance. And thermal resistance is THE ultimate measure of how a cooling device reduces the difference between Idle and Load temperatures in Centigrade. (So what better measure would you want for evaluating a cooling device?)
The advertisement (and check the review again) boasts that the unit is more effective at cooling than mainstream water-cooling kits.
We should keep an eye on future reviews of the CNPS-9500-Led, because sooner or later, somebody somewhere (in Germany, US, UK, etc) will measure thermal resistance of the CNPS-9500 and compare it to other heatpipe coolers.
I remain hopeful, optimistic, but skeptically reserved until someone shows me the numbers.
I'm from Missourah . . . . show me!
Page 73 -- Zalman's advertisement for the CNPS-9500.
I have some observations about this, and there is a review available:
Review of the CNPS-9500
Neither the review nor the advertisement mentions the optimum thermal resistance specification for the heat-pipe cooler.
The advertisement shows a graph of temperature against fan-speed. This appears to be partly "hype", because beyond some given fan-speed and therefore air-flow in CFMs, there will be no improvement in thermal resistance. And thermal resistance is THE ultimate measure of how a cooling device reduces the difference between Idle and Load temperatures in Centigrade. (So what better measure would you want for evaluating a cooling device?)
The advertisement (and check the review again) boasts that the unit is more effective at cooling than mainstream water-cooling kits.
We should keep an eye on future reviews of the CNPS-9500-Led, because sooner or later, somebody somewhere (in Germany, US, UK, etc) will measure thermal resistance of the CNPS-9500 and compare it to other heatpipe coolers.
I remain hopeful, optimistic, but skeptically reserved until someone shows me the numbers.
I'm from Missourah . . . . show me!