What a load of crap. Try running 10 miles twice a week and tell me it doesn't do SHIT.
I was curious, so I just bought a Fitbit on Amazon a few mins ago.
My job involves constant walking so it should be interesting.
Far too many of these studies are chicken or the egg arguments. Is the sitting groups worse health strictly because of sitting, or because those spending most of the day on their ass are also more likely to be shoving truck loads of processed foods in their gullet? I skimmed the article as it's a bit long, so forgive me if I missed some details, but I didn't see anything showing where they studied two groups of in shape individuals, with healthy diets and a solid exorcize schedule.
Highly recommended.a solid exorcize schedule
And crushing your pudendal nerve.D:I am sitting down when I cycle, so am I negating the exercise?
And crushing your pudendal nerve.D:
You should just stick to Friends re-runs and moon pies. Look at how many walmartians that works for.
:hi-5;I've been sitting for 28 years and have not died yet, I think I'll continue to sit and just move around once in a while like I've always done. I do need to work out more though... but if sitting cancels it out, then why bother at this point.![]()
Can't imagine typing or doing any real work while standing either, just too awkward.
You can run 10 miles in an hour and fifteen minutes?
That's pretty impressive.
Either way, while I would agree that a couple long cardio sessions are better than lots of tiny short ones...it's still going to take more to burn off a week of sedentary cheeseburger eating.
Walking at work is not the same as actual blood-pumping, heavy-breathing, sweating cardio.
All work does for me is keep my leg and back muscles a little more toned than they would otherwise be.
150 minutes a week of 'moderately intense' aerobics is pretty weak. That's about 20 minutes a day, and I'm gonna guess they define their intensity by heartrate.

Bri, get off your a**. I enjoy your company.
Waning Moon.
![]()
