Exercise won't do much good if you sit around all day and night

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,908
4,940
136
So wait, if you sit for most of the day it will cancel out the hour you exercised? Sheesh why even bother.

Eh. Social Security and the country are going to pot anyway.
 

phucheneh

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2012
7,306
5
0
150 minutes a week of 'moderately intense' aerobics is pretty weak. That's about 20 minutes a day, and I'm gonna guess they define their intensity by heartrate.

...the 140-150bpm that I seem to see commonly recommended, is not shit. Fat people may exceed that going up a flight of stairs.

Anyway, of course that won't be adequate if that's literally all the exercise you get, and the vast majority of your work and personal time is spent sitting down. Like most 'studies,' this seems like something that does not really require studying to figure out.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,732
3,449
136
What a load of crap. Try running 10 miles twice a week and tell me it doesn't do SHIT.
 

phucheneh

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2012
7,306
5
0
What a load of crap. Try running 10 miles twice a week and tell me it doesn't do SHIT.

You can run 10 miles in an hour and fifteen minutes?

That's pretty impressive.

Either way, while I would agree that a couple long cardio sessions are better than lots of tiny short ones...it's still going to take more to burn off a week of sedentary cheeseburger eating.

I was curious, so I just bought a Fitbit on Amazon a few mins ago.

My job involves constant walking so it should be interesting.

Walking at work is not the same as actual blood-pumping, heavy-breathing, sweating cardio.

All work does for me is keep my leg and back muscles a little more toned than they would otherwise be.
 

motsm

Golden Member
Jan 20, 2010
1,822
2
76
Far too many of these studies are chicken or the egg arguments. Is the sitting groups worse health strictly because of sitting, or because those spending most of the day on their ass are also more likely to be shoving truck loads of processed foods in their gullet? I skimmed the article as it's a bit long, so forgive me if I missed some details, but I didn't see anything showing where they studied two groups of in shape individuals, with healthy diets and a solid exorcize schedule.

That said, it should be obvious to anyone with a brain that sitting is worse for you than spending that time being active, but we don't need studies for that.

:Edit: Looks like I missed the first article, was reading the Sitting is Killing You one, though this first one doesn't seem to be saying anything different.
 
Last edited:

ImpulsE69

Lifer
Jan 8, 2010
14,946
1,077
126
The key to anything is moderation. People probably do sit way more than they should these days, but telling them exercising doesn't 'counter' it is counter productive.

Next month there will be a study saying standing too much increases your chances of an aneurism.
 

stlc8tr

Golden Member
Jan 5, 2011
1,106
4
76
Far too many of these studies are chicken or the egg arguments. Is the sitting groups worse health strictly because of sitting, or because those spending most of the day on their ass are also more likely to be shoving truck loads of processed foods in their gullet? I skimmed the article as it's a bit long, so forgive me if I missed some details, but I didn't see anything showing where they studied two groups of in shape individuals, with healthy diets and a solid exorcize schedule.

IIRC, it was a meta-analysis study of existing data. They didn't actually conduct a new experiment with a control group.
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,338
136
Well, if we lived 150 years ago, worked hard all of our lives, we'd still be fortunate to hit 40.

Waste of $$. Hopefully it wasn't tax $$.

a solid exorcize schedule
Highly recommended.:p
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,780
13,870
126
www.anyf.ca
Can't imagine standing around all day. Feet would hurt and probably eventually get joint issues at knees. Can only stand for so long till I need to take a break. Can't imagine typing or doing any real work while standing either, just too awkward. Would be even worse for people who are like 200lbs.

I've been sitting for 28 years and have not died yet, I think I'll continue to sit and just move around once in a while like I've always done. I do need to work out more though... but if sitting cancels it out, then why bother at this point. :p
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,338
136
I've been sitting for 28 years and have not died yet, I think I'll continue to sit and just move around once in a while like I've always done. I do need to work out more though... but if sitting cancels it out, then why bother at this point. :p
:hi-5;
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,732
3,449
136
You can run 10 miles in an hour and fifteen minutes?

That's pretty impressive.

Either way, while I would agree that a couple long cardio sessions are better than lots of tiny short ones...it's still going to take more to burn off a week of sedentary cheeseburger eating.



Walking at work is not the same as actual blood-pumping, heavy-breathing, sweating cardio.

All work does for me is keep my leg and back muscles a little more toned than they would otherwise be.

I just blew out 11 miles, came home and pigged out like a bastard. Do it your way, bro. My shit works.
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,639
6,016
136
150 minutes a week of 'moderately intense' aerobics is pretty weak. That's about 20 minutes a day, and I'm gonna guess they define their intensity by heartrate.

i havent had a minute of moderately intense aerobics since october :colbert: