"So, I think that our ability to manage large systems and to execute, I think, has been made clear over the last couple of years."
Take that comment into the context that Obama did manage and execute a come from behind lamblasting over Hillary and her campaign. The same Hillary that was being crowned the Presidency just several months ago. Everyone thought HRC was going to win, Obama managed to change that outcome.
As far as running a campaign, I think Obama can get away with gloating a little bit over that.
As far as experience goes...he shouldn't have answered the question. OR, he should have answered the question by saying that the Republicans must have forgotten that they elected McCain to run for the Presidency, just like he was elected to run for POTUS by the democratic party. If republicans dont want to discuss McCain (and who can blame them), and would rather discuss Palin, then maybe they elected the wrong person to run for President? Thats how I would have answered the question.
Obama needs to not compound these issues over experience with Palin...because it doesnt matter. In the end it is still Obama vs McCain. And when discussing experience, he should discuss the experience that Senator McCain brings to the table, compared to Candidate McCain...and all the differences in between. Then he needs to stick to his message about the changes he outlined in his acceptance speech. I fear the Palin extravaganza has made even Obama forget about the ideas he outlined in his acceptance speech.
Get back on message.
One last thing: Someone somewhere is going to have to define this "Executive Experience" term that has been created to bash Obama with. I am pretty sure that under the definition of "executive experience" not even McCain can lay claim to any such experience. On the same note, maybe all the mayors and governors of various municipalities across the country can now say that they have the experience required to run the country? Wow that would be interesting....
But I could be wrong...