Ex-UN weapons inspector in child-sex sting

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
What other than the pedo stuff did you suspect him of lying?
That depends. Are you talking about when he claimed Saddam still had WMDs -

"Iraq, today is not disarmed, and remains an ugly threat to its neighbors and to world peace. Those Americans who think that this is important and that something should be done about it have to be deeply disappointed in our leadership."

Scott Ritter September 3, 1998

- or are you talking about when he suddenly flip-flopped on that stance 5 years or so down the road?
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,874
6,409
126
Some in here may remember Scott Ritter being brought up on child porn charges back in 2003. At the time he claimed the charges were trumped-up, false allegations coming from the White House because of his opposition to the Iraq invasion.

Well, he been nabbed again. This time the evidence is a bit more damning.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34864444/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/



Good riddance to bad rubbish. I had a suspicion all along he was a lying sack-o-shit, and not just about his pedo ways.

Ahh see, you were being quite reasonable and agreeable until you added in that rubbish right there.

If he's Guilty, he should be punished.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,874
6,409
126
There have been several innuendos in this thread that somehow Scott Ritter being a sex offender would affect his statements and analysis on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (or to be more exact, the complete lack of them). Can someone draw this chain of causation out for me? I'd be interested.

Too lazy to, but will add that it's strange they'd go there when Ritter's claims about Iraq have turned out to be True. It's like they're still trying to justify being completely wrong. :\
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
He's trolling, that is what he does and that is all he does, he never supplies relevant information nor any sort of educated opinion, he just trolls.

I'm thinking 13/M/mums basement.

Hmm.. Troll? How about this:

  • I'll await the centifuges bullsheit to come up next, i don't have the time to explain it to the retards, could someone else take over and educate these fucked beyond belief idiots for a while?
  • You seem to know a lot about this, perhaps when i'm 90 and in your shape i'll try one of your cocktails.
    Until then, keep your need for medications to be able to fuck your cat to yourself.
  • He's fucked up on Ganja and still claims that it has no effects on his brain.
    He says that science tells him that, i'm fairly sure he has an imaginary cat named science.
  • What the fuck is a G-d?
    Seriously, i don't know what the fuck that is? Are you trying to trick God and not using his name in vain by not typing God?
    How fucking retarded do you think God is?
  • I'm a British Jew you stupid twat. I don't need a justification for disliking Indian honor system that kills several women and children every single year.
  • If Indians stopped throwing their children off of balconies, shooting them in the face, burning them with acid and oil and other perverted sheit i would have nothing against them.
  • Well that says nothing, if it's slightly higher than the average Repugs it's somewhere between an avocado and a rabbit.
    And THAT is why they love her, she's smarter than all of them put together
  • Not too fucking bright, are ya?
    Well, i think everyone already knew that so it's not a newsflash for anyone but perhaps you.
  • It's the base of the entire right, without that, the right would have NO votes, well, except for the KKK following who vote for the Conservatives out of general principle.
  • YAY, two twats who can't type in the same thread... i'm out.
  • China is a fuckhole of a third world nation where saying anything against the power that is will earn you a death sentence, it's like Iran without the religion.
    Fuck China.
  • That is a good belief, perhaps you should post when you're not completely fucked up and make more sense, that would be interesting.
    As it is going, you're going to have to get a brain translplant...
  • I'm not white you stupid twat, i'm Jewish by heritage and i have never raped anyone nor would i ever do that, i'm not higher caste Indian.
Want to guess which stupid twat spoke those words? Those are just SOME of your 'relevant information' and 'educated opinions' that you have contributed OVER THE PAST 24 HOURS. Half the forum may hate me, but you've managed to make EVERYONE hate you. You can hardly make a post without spewing swears, insults, etc. Everyone here may be the 13 year old in the basement you claim they are, unfortunately they all look like rational intelligent reasonable posters compared to the stuff you post.

Here's a clue.. just because the military gives you a gun and tells you to go shoot brown people, that doesn't make you intelligent. Hell, Bush was an officer in the military. And just because you can bully people under your command and force them to agree with you - We don't have to. I thank God every day that I am not as bitter, angry, and immature as you are.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Too lazy to, but will add that it's strange they'd go there when Ritter's claims about Iraq have turned out to be True. It's like they're still trying to justify being completely wrong. :\

It's mostly people who speak the truth they go after.

Joe Wilson, Daniel Elllsberg, etc.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
There have been several innuendos in this thread that somehow Scott Ritter being a sex offender would affect his statements and analysis on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (or to be more exact, the complete lack of them). Can someone draw this chain of causation out for me? I'd be interested.

Sure - If he was willing to lie about the government setting him up the first time, why would he not be willing to lie about the actions of another government? Or maybe he was too busy downloading kiddy porn to even do a true investigation.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Ahh see, you were being quite reasonable and agreeable until you added in that rubbish right there.

If he's Guilty, he should be punished.
You were appointed as Czar of All Things Reasonable and Agreeable when, exactly? I must have missed the memo.
 

cliftonite

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2001
6,900
63
91
That depends. Are you talking about when he claimed Saddam still had WMDs -

"Iraq, today is not disarmed, and remains an ugly threat to its neighbors and to world peace. Those Americans who think that this is important and that something should be done about it have to be deeply disappointed in our leadership."

Scott Ritter September 3, 1998

- or are you talking about when he suddenly flip-flopped on that stance 5 years or so down the road?

Except that flip flop turned out to be right.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Anyone who puts Reason above nonsense is appointed a Czar of Reason. You'd know that if you'd just change your ways.
That's exactly what all the partisan tools on both sides say - 'if you'd just change your ways.' I just find that argument so subjectively unconvincing.
 
Last edited:
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Except that flip flop turned out to be right.
Wasn't that hard. He had a 50/50 chance of being right. (As long as you exclude those 500 or so chemical weapons they found after the invasion, which so many conveniently do. After all, it's so easy to misplace 500 chemical warheads. Happens all the time.)
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,874
6,409
126
That's exactly what all the partisan tools on both sides say - 'if you'd just change your ways.' I just find that argument so subjectively unconvinving.

What I said really isn't Partisan in the least. You resorted to a form of Guilt by Association and/or other Logical Fallacy.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
What I said really isn't Partisan in the least. You resorted to a form of Guilt by Association and/or other Logical Fallacy.
Funny. For years and years under Bush we had people in here claiming that you can never trust a liar.

Now I know they were merely using a Guilt by Association fallacy. Thanks for clearing that up.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,254
55,807
136
Except that flip flop turned out to be right.

I love how changing your mind about something is considered a bad thing. Ritter changed his opinion from a wrong one to a right one. We should be happy that someone was able to correctly judge the situation.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Hmm.. Troll? How about this:

  • I'll await the centifuges bullsheit to come up next, i don't have the time to explain it to the retards, could someone else take over and educate these fucked beyond belief idiots for a while?
  • You seem to know a lot about this, perhaps when i'm 90 and in your shape i'll try one of your cocktails.
    Until then, keep your need for medications to be able to fuck your cat to yourself.
  • He's fucked up on Ganja and still claims that it has no effects on his brain.
    He says that science tells him that, i'm fairly sure he has an imaginary cat named science.
  • What the fuck is a G-d?
    Seriously, i don't know what the fuck that is? Are you trying to trick God and not using his name in vain by not typing God?
    How fucking retarded do you think God is?
  • I'm a British Jew you stupid twat. I don't need a justification for disliking Indian honor system that kills several women and children every single year.
  • If Indians stopped throwing their children off of balconies, shooting them in the face, burning them with acid and oil and other perverted sheit i would have nothing against them.
  • Well that says nothing, if it's slightly higher than the average Repugs it's somewhere between an avocado and a rabbit.
    And THAT is why they love her, she's smarter than all of them put together
  • Not too fucking bright, are ya?
    Well, i think everyone already knew that so it's not a newsflash for anyone but perhaps you.
  • It's the base of the entire right, without that, the right would have NO votes, well, except for the KKK following who vote for the Conservatives out of general principle.
  • YAY, two twats who can't type in the same thread... i'm out.
  • China is a fuckhole of a third world nation where saying anything against the power that is will earn you a death sentence, it's like Iran without the religion.
    Fuck China.
  • That is a good belief, perhaps you should post when you're not completely fucked up and make more sense, that would be interesting.
    As it is going, you're going to have to get a brain translplant...
  • I'm not white you stupid twat, i'm Jewish by heritage and i have never raped anyone nor would i ever do that, i'm not higher caste Indian.
Want to guess which stupid twat spoke those words? Those are just SOME of your 'relevant information' and 'educated opinions' that you have contributed OVER THE PAST 24 HOURS. Half the forum may hate me, but you've managed to make EVERYONE hate you. You can hardly make a post without spewing swears, insults, etc. Everyone here may be the 13 year old in the basement you claim they are, unfortunately they all look like rational intelligent reasonable posters compared to the stuff you post.

Here's a clue.. just because the military gives you a gun and tells you to go shoot brown people, that doesn't make you intelligent. Hell, Bush was an officer in the military. And just because you can bully people under your command and force them to agree with you - We don't have to. I thank God every day that I am not as bitter, angry, and immature as you are.

Son, i value those that i am in contact with here and don't give a fuck about the rest.

You'd be surprised at the random selection of people who i do keep contact with on these forums, some are obvious, we share quite a lot of experience, some not so obvious, you'd think they would hate me but they don't.

Being upfront and honest does have it's perks, i don't need to pretend because people already know my views.

I stand by my previous statement, you are a fucking troll, just like avocado confetti.

Equally fucking boring and equally stupid, you have to be told what to think because neither of you have ever had an original thought.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
I love how changing your mind about something is considered a bad thing. Ritter changed his opinion from a wrong one to a right one. We should be happy that someone was able to correctly judge the situation.
Except he didn't even change his mind. The weapons were there in 1998, Clinton had them blown up, by 2003 whatever was left had deteriorated into worthless goo. Sir Chicken knows this quite well, but he's blowing revisionist smoke to mislead those with poor memories.

I'd also like to see him back up his claim re., "those 500 or so chemical weapons they found after the invasion." As I remember it, we found a bunch of empty warheads -- NOT actual chemical weapons -- and reportedly a handful that used to be chemical weapons before they rotted away.
 
Last edited:
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
I love how changing your mind about something is considered a bad thing. Ritter changed his opinion from a wrong one to a right one. We should be happy that someone was able to correctly judge the situation.
He should have changed his mind about IM'ing 15 year-old girls too. He sure misjudged that one.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Except he didn't even change his mind. The weapons were there in 1998, Clinton had them blown up, by 1993 whatever was left had deteriorated into worthless goo. Sir Chicken knows this quite well, but he's blowing revisionist smoke to mislead those with poor memories.

I'd also like to see him back up his claim re., "those 500 or so chemical weapons they found after the invasion." As I remember it, we found a bunch of empty warheads -- NOT actual chemical weapons -- and reportedly a handful that used to be chemical weapons before they rotted away.

Oh look, it's bowfinger coming in and using the lame old "clinton blew them up" crap again. Seriously, do you really believe that crap?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,254
55,807
136
Except he didn't even change his mind. The weapons were there in 1998, Clinton had them blown up, by 1993 whatever was left had deteriorated into worthless goo. Sir Chicken knows this quite well, but he's blowing revisionist smoke to mislead those with poor memories.

I'd also like to see him back up his claim re., "those 500 or so chemical weapons they found after the invasion." As I remember it, we found a bunch of empty warheads -- NOT actual chemical weapons -- and reportedly a handful that used to be chemical weapons before they rotted away.

Yeap, the weapons found after the invasion were old and largely useless, even if they were intentionally hidden (which does not appear to be the case) they bore absolutely zero resemblance to the WMD that our government claimed as a justification for the invasion. It's an attempt for war supporters to cloud the issue in order to appear less wrong.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Oh look, it's bowfinger coming in and using the lame old "clinton blew them up" crap again. Seriously, do you really believe that crap?
Yes dear, because it's true. I know that's not what they preach in your Faux echo chamber, but Clinton's 1998 bombing of Iraq was well documented by legitimate news organizations. You should check into them sometime.