• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Cerpin Taxt said:
I didn't say you did.


Evolution does not work that way. Objectively, you can only talk about what things do. Once you start making claims about what something is for, you've abandoned objectivity, and are instead projecting purpose onto objectively purposeless processes.


False.
Click to expand...

Purpose can simply be the result of an object coming into existence; whether the specific purpose it is serving was intended, or not. In this way, may biological functions have purpose.
 
He didn't include her name or face on the billboard. I wholeheartedly support his decision to exercise his right to free speech in a way that doesn't invade her right to privacy.

<--- ain't reading the other fifteen pages of posts.
 
sixone said:
He didn't include her name or face on the billboard. I wholeheartedly support his decision to exercise his right to free speech in a way that doesn't invade her right to privacy.

<--- ain't reading the other fifteen pages of posts.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, if you had (well, not the last few perhaps), you would have realized that he did put her name on the billboard. It says "Created for N. A. N. I. - National Association for Needed Information." The woman's first name (or nickname) is Nani. A google search for "National Association for Needed Information" also returns nothing of value for such an organization.
 
TheVrolok said:
Unfortunately, if you had (well, not the last few perhaps), you would have realized that he did put her name on the billboard. It says "Created for N. A. N. I. - National Association for Needed Information." The woman's first name (or nickname) is Nani. A google search for "National Association for Needed Information" also returns nothing of value for such an organization.
Click to expand...

Love it.
 
TheVrolok said:
Unfortunately, if you had (well, not the last few perhaps), you would have realized that he did put her name on the billboard. It says "Created for N. A. N. I. - National Association for Needed Information." The woman's first name (or nickname) is Nani. A google search for "National Association for Needed Information" also returns nothing of value for such an organization.
Click to expand...

Come on, thats a stretch isnt it....1st name only, there must be thousands with that name!
 
TheVrolok said:
Unfortunately, if you had (well, not the last few perhaps), you would have realized that he did put her name on the billboard. It says "Created for N. A. N. I. - National Association for Needed Information." The woman's first name (or nickname) is Nani. A google search for "National Association for Needed Information" also returns nothing of value for such an organization.
Click to expand...

And a google search of "Nani" returns more than 42 million results. She still has her privacy.

Works for me.
 
TheVrolok said:
He impregnated 1. The fact that it easily discernible to whom he is referring indicates her violated her privacy.
Click to expand...

You told me that I needed to read the other 15 pages to find that out.

So much for "easily discernible."

And thank you for posting her name, therefore violating her privacy yourself.
 
sixone said:
You told me that I needed to read the other 15 pages to find that out.

So much for "easily discernible."

And thank you for posting her name, therefore violating her privacy yourself.
Click to expand...

I said you didn't need to read the other 15. 😛 Really, you only needed to go as far as to see the picture of the billboard which was post 20, on the first page. I can't "re-violate" her privacy once it has been taken. 😛 Also, the NANI, the founder of which is the asshat himself, has now been renamed to the Coalition About Needed Information. Heh.
 
novasatori said:
Holy shit some of the comments in those links

No he did not because he &#8220;was told by the doctors he was sterile&#8221; and he told her the same thing. [in reference to condoms]
The woman&#8217;s side of the story? I knew this girl when she was just a kid. She is about 15 years younger than him and handicapped. Also, she didn&#8217;t have a medical procedure abortion. She miscarried. National Association of Needed Information? That&#8217;s an acronym for the poor girl&#8217;s name.
The one thing you are missing is that he got her pregnant when she was 17.
Click to expand...
also linked to these tweets from him:
http://s1223.photobucket.com/albums/dd516/whtrbt2011/?albumview=slideshow

in the tweets he refers to her as nani too

I was kinda on his side but he sounds like a real piece of shit to me, not someone I want standing up for men.
Click to expand...

wow that guy sucks


Sounds like he might be getting a cagey about whether it was an abortion or a miscarriage. In either case the world is very fortunate he hasn't reproduced.
Fultz told the Daily News he started the organization because of an incident that happened to him with a woman where &#8220;there was a pregnancy, then there wasn&#8217;t.&#8221;
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
HAL9000 said:
Love it.
Click to expand...

Don't you have some fucktarded opinion that celebrities, people who have worked hard to become well-known, shouldn't have their behavior reported on? But some guy in his 30s lies to a disabled teenage girl about being sterile, impregnates her, then when she either has a miscarriage (according to her friends) or has an abortion (according to one psychopath who fantasizes about killing her) - you "Love it." when he buys a billboard to tell people she had an abortion?
 
Theb said:
Don't you have some fucktarded opinion that celebrities, people who have worked hard to become well-known, shouldn't have their behavior reported on? But some guy in his 30s lies to a disabled teenage girl about being sterile, impregnates her, then when she either has a miscarriage (according to her friends) or has an abortion (according to one psychopath who fantasizes about killing her) - you "Love it." when he buys a billboard to tell people she had an abortion?
Click to expand...

If celebrities kill children it should be reported in the news.

If celebrities sleep with each other it should not.
 
TheVrolok said:
I said you didn't need to read the other 15. 😛 Really, you only needed to go as far as to see the picture of the billboard which was post 20, on the first page. I can't "re-violate" her privacy once it has been taken. 😛 Also, the NANI, the founder of which is the asshat himself, has now been renamed to the Coalition About Needed Information. Heh.
Click to expand...

I would never have known any of that, if you hadn't told me. Therefore you did violate her privacy, by providing information to someone who didn't already have it. You did exactly what you're accusing him of.
 
sixone said:
I would never have known any of that, if you hadn't told me. Therefore you did violate her privacy, by providing information to someone who didn't already have it. You did exactly what you're accusing him of.
Click to expand...

That would be true if she currently expected complete privacy in this matter. As that has already been violated, she cannot have a reasonable expectation to privacy and therefore I cannot re-violate it. Simply wishing something that is now public to go away doesn't make it private once again. Once it's out, it's out.
 
TheVrolok said:
That would be true if she currently expected complete privacy in this matter. As that has already been violated, she cannot have a reasonable expectation to privacy and therefore I cannot re-violate it. Simply wishing something that is now public to go away doesn't make it private once again. Once it's out, it's out.
Click to expand...

What she expects is irrelevant. If she has a right to privacy, that right doesn't end when someone violates it. You provided more information than the BF included on the billboard, and are therefore responsible for the violations you have committed.
 
sixone said:
What she expects is irrelevant. If she has a right to privacy, that right doesn't end when someone violates it. You provided more information than the BF included on the billboard, and are therefore responsible for the violations you have committed.
Click to expand...

I didn't provide (source) that information, I merely passed it along. It's public information now, and therefore there is no expectation of privacy. Do you honestly think I know her on a personal level and have just leaked her name?
 
sixone said:
I would never have known any of that, if you hadn't told me. Therefore you did violate her privacy, by providing information to someone who didn't already have it. You did exactly what you're accusing him of.
Click to expand...

Ignore him, some peoples brains don't work properly.
 
TheVrolok said:
I didn't provide (source) that information, I merely passed it along. It's public information now, and therefore there is no expectation of privacy. Do you honestly think I know her on a personal level and have just leaked her name?
Click to expand...

Did you post that information in your reply to me because you thought I already had it? Of course not. You have shared that information with someone who didn't have it, and certainly had no need for it.

You've done something that the guy with the billboard didn't do. If you can't take responsibility for it, you should probably stop doing it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top