• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
ahenkel said:
I sure hope the pro-life people win. Then when women desperate for abortions start using dangerous illegal methods and they start dying that will sure show them.
Click to expand...

That's true, but the number of people doing it will shoot down from 1 in 3. Saving a lot of babies 🙂
 
HAL9000 said:
That's true, but the number of people doing it will shoot down from 1 in 3. Saving a lot of babies 🙂
Click to expand...

So what you're saying is that its okay to kill a pregnant woman if it scares other people from having an abortion, and this is why I hate playing with the pro-life people.
 
ahenkel said:
So what you're saying is that its okay to kill a pregnant woman if it scares other people from having an abortion, and this is why I hate playing with the pro-life people.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure exactly what the ratio of how many babies are worth one woman, but there is a number.
 
HAL9000 said:
Piss off and cheerio? Do you know what you are saying?

I'm fine with you not liking me, why you feel the constant urge to inform me I have no idea.

Luckily for me, there are a fuck load of people who are pro-life like myself. So yes we do have a say, we may even get our way one day. 🙂
Click to expand...

No, there are very few who are anti womans rights like you, less than one in 100 in England and about the same in the US.

You can join the religious extremists in your quest to control women because those are the ones you said you hated but will now have to join...

I told you i pity you, this is why.

You didn't honestly expect an old SAS TFB Captain to be wrong, did you? Funny little man.
 
HAL9000 said:
That's true, but the number of people doing it will shoot down from 1 in 3. Saving a lot of babies 🙂
Click to expand...

How many will you adopt, anything less than at least 50 for a good effort is too little considering the veracity of your support...

Oh and we need your kidneys too, someone will die if you don't donate them, yeah, both, and liver, heart and marrow oh and of course blood, what right do you have to your body to stop others from living?

I'll need to remove your toenails first, not becuase of medical neccessity but because being as fucking retarded as you are should HURT.
 
HAL9000 said:
I'm not sure exactly what the ratio of how many babies are worth one woman, but there is a number.
Click to expand...

So basically a fetus carries more weight in on the scale of life than a woman who has the potential to create more life even if at this time she has an abortion.
 
JohnOfSheffield said:
No, there are very few who are anti womans rights like you, less than one in 100 in England and about the same in the US.

You can join the religious extremists in your quest to control women because those are the ones you said you hated but will now have to join...

I told you i pity you, this is why.

You didn't honestly expect an old SAS TFB Captain to be wrong, did you? Funny little man.
Click to expand...

You think 1% of people are pro life 🙄 this thread should show you that's not the case.

OK "SAS" Man... Lol.

Edit: You are wrong.
 
Last edited:
LumbergTech said:
"That's true, but the number of people doing it will shoot down from 1 in 3. Saving a lot of babies"


Explain to me how that is not pro woman murder?
Click to expand...

Choosing to do an illegal operation that results in your death is not being murdered. Nor am I pro people doing that operation.
 
HAL9000 said:
You think 1% of people are pro life 🙄 this thread should show you that's not the case.

OK "SAS" Man... Lol.
Click to expand...

No, i think less than one hundredth of a millionth or just about every one is for or against it and IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER!

To be fair, i've explained it wide and far, crossways up and down and all around in this thread and you still don't get it...

It's not your body, you don't get to decide... it's that fucking simple.
 
LumbergTech said:
"That's true, but the number of people doing it will shoot down from 1 in 3. Saving a lot of babies"


Explain to me how that is not pro woman murder?
Click to expand...


First he says if women get raped they should not protect themselves by killing the attacker. Now it's ok if 1 in 3 women die if 2 of 3 babies are saved. There's no point arguing with him anymore.
 
Cookie said:
First he says if women get raped they should not protect themselves by killing the attacker. Now it's ok if 1 in 3 women die if 2 of 3 babies are saved. There's no point arguing with him anymore.
Click to expand...

The way he thinks is disturbing...I suspect it is because he has very little experience with actual life situations
 
JohnOfSheffield said:
No, i think less than one hundredth of a millionth or just about every one is for or against it and IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER!

To be fair, i've explained it wide and far, crossways up and down and all around in this thread and you still don't get it...

It's not your body, you don't get to decide... it's that fucking simple.
Click to expand...

Hopefully things will change so that we do get to make it illegal 🙂 It could happen, the government has a say on what people can legally do with their body as it is, it could well head down this way. Fingers crossed.

Cookie said:
First he says if women get raped they should not protect themselves by killing the attacker. Now it's ok if 1 in 3 women die if 2 of 3 babies are saved. There's no point arguing with him anymore.
Click to expand...

I didn't provide the ratio.
 
HAL9000 said:
Choosing to do an illegal operation that results in your death is not being murdered. Nor am I pro people doing that operation.
Click to expand...

An illegal operatin that results in death is PER FUCKING DEFINITION MURDER...

How you even managed to get on the internet much less to log on to Anandtech needs to be studied.

If it is, every other post will eventually be oink.
 
JohnOfSheffield said:
An illegal operatin that results in death is PER FUCKING DEFINITION MURDER...

How you even managed to get on the internet much less to log on to Anandtech needs to be studied.

If it is, every other post will eventually be oink.
Click to expand...

I think that if it is consensual then it would be a grey area. In any event, I'm not for people doing that.
 
LumbergTech said:
The way he thinks is disturbing...I suspect it is because he has very little experience with actual life situations
Click to expand...

I agree, I think he thinks of things in very black and white perfect world situations and uses those ideals to come up with his morals. When in reality the world is neither black and white, nor perfect. What's most annoying to me is the fact that he thinks everyone should adhere to his morals and what HE thinks is right.
 
HAL9000 said:
Hopefully things will change so that we do get to make it illegal 🙂 It could happen, the government has a say on what people can legally do with their body as it is, it could well head down this way. Fingers crossed.



I didn't provide the ratio.
Click to expand...


No the government should never have any say what an individual does to their body or has someone else do to them with consent. My right to do whatever drugs I want pursue whatever sexual relationships I choose or even injure or kill myself should not be infringed because it makes people uncomfortable.
 
ahenkel said:
No the government should never have any say what an individual does to their body or has someone else do to them with consent. My right to do whatever drugs I want pursue whatever sexual relationships I choose or even injure or kill myself should not be infringed because it makes people uncomfortable.
Click to expand...

I disagree the government should have the right, not because it makes them uncomfortable though.
 
no they don't have a right to interfere with personal liberties no government should ever have a say in how I treat my own body ever. Case closed. I don't care how unsafe something might be I as a free man have that right to choose for myself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top