Here is the problem I have with the evolution theory. Now don't even consider creation or anything. Just put that aside and look at it from this standpoint.
There are dinosaur bones all over the place. They dig them up everywhere. Millions of years old. For one everything is already in a finished state. But even besides that. Where the hell are all the other supposed millions of years of NEWER bones from everything inbetween??
No offense, but this is simply untrue. They have found plenty of examples of species which are in a stage of transition from one state to another.
They should be digging up thousands and thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of bones that are the inbetween stages and even much newer and not as deep down. But they don't. They don't exist. Every single species should be out there. Millions of them. They can find an old frog or deer. And an even older frog or deer. And even older ones than that. But nothing inbetween. There should be thousands of versions inbetween. Sure they have a small handful of things they try to piece together. I mean there should be millions of these bones out there.
You seem to think that all species are perfectly preserved after death. This is simply untrue.
All I'm saying is that's fine if you want to look at it from strictly a science point of view. But people are treating the evolution theory like the scientists are their religions leaders.
Except that nobody treats scientists as religious leaders. In fact it's the opposite. Science goes by what is the best current way to explain something. If someone in the world of science came up with a better theory, and it's proveable, then that theory is now the de-facto standard. Evolution has held up for a very long time with literally thousands of scientists trying to disprove it or explain it further. It holds up because of several key features:
A) Evidence. We can see it in action, and we can see proof of it in action from the past. In fact every single new fossil that is discovered further adds to it.
B) It works. We have created things that modern people take for granted, e.g. medicine, from our understanding of evolution.
C) Predictions. We can make predictions from what we know to further find out more about it.
Which they are always constantly bickering about facts. And ALWAYS changing back and forth especially about dates and ages. So basically last years info was wrong that you wanted to believe because they changed it again. But last year you defended the info to death. But it was wrong. Then next year they change it again. Meaning you were wrong this year. Then they change it back again.
That's the nature of science - constantly trying to get better. Religion is the opposite - you have one thing stated, and anything that disputes it is ignored. The system of science is such that debating is encouraged, which means that any theories out there have to stand up against a very rigorous set of tests in order to prove itself.
It's fine to look at the pure science of things, but perhaps look for a better scientific theory then. It honestly just doesn't hold up for what is presented right now
If you have a better theory, you are more than welcome to challenge the existing theory. That's the beauty of science. It does hold up, and it is provable, observable, and you can make predictions from it. That is why it holds up.