Keysplayr
Elite Member
- Jan 16, 2003
- 21,219
- 55
- 91
Dave, I think what he means is, this"issue" isnt the "issue" you and others on here are interested in perpetuating. VRMs are well below their nominal thresholds let alone their Tjmax even in worst case scenario torture tests.
It looks like the number of cards that fail hasnt really changed and are likely due to defects in parts and manufacturing, just as any company is susceptible to. 200 cards per million failing is quite low, dont you think? And they arent failing due to burning hot VRMs. The level of effort and attention to the smallest detail and minutia in these tests Mark has linked to leave zero room for doubt. So, any efforts to perpetuate or exacerbate this non issue is probably going to be viewed as extremist trolling and intentional spreading of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. At this point, that would be obvious.
You saying "Regardless" to Marks findings and his opinion backed by those findings says a lot about your agenda. Says you dont care about any data disproving the VRMgate that you and others here want to have remain perfectly believable. People here are smarter than you think. You should give them more credit than that.
eVGA is a fantastic company with 2nd to none customer service. Yes, they should have used thermal pads to afford better performance. NOT to prevent VRMs catching fire. I hope you're clear about all this after reading that testing article Mark posted.
It looks like the number of cards that fail hasnt really changed and are likely due to defects in parts and manufacturing, just as any company is susceptible to. 200 cards per million failing is quite low, dont you think? And they arent failing due to burning hot VRMs. The level of effort and attention to the smallest detail and minutia in these tests Mark has linked to leave zero room for doubt. So, any efforts to perpetuate or exacerbate this non issue is probably going to be viewed as extremist trolling and intentional spreading of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. At this point, that would be obvious.
You saying "Regardless" to Marks findings and his opinion backed by those findings says a lot about your agenda. Says you dont care about any data disproving the VRMgate that you and others here want to have remain perfectly believable. People here are smarter than you think. You should give them more credit than that.
eVGA is a fantastic company with 2nd to none customer service. Yes, they should have used thermal pads to afford better performance. NOT to prevent VRMs catching fire. I hope you're clear about all this after reading that testing article Mark posted.
Last edited:
