everquest next cancelled

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,406
136
Sad but the videos looked like wow on steroids. Plus I never understood how they were going to keep everything looking nice while allowing everything to be destroyed or shaped into a dong.
 

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
Sad but the videos looked like wow on steroids. Plus I never understood how they were going to keep everything looking nice while allowing everything to be destroyed or shaped into a dong.

True. But the fact is this. SOE, or Daybreak if you will, has a lot of recognition from Everquest. Everquest 1 and Everquest 2 are still played, and still bringing in money, but that will only ever be limited in what it can do for the company. In order to have a future they have to produce new games. I am certain the way both Landmark and Everquest Next have been run has disillusioned many fans and potential customers, and Daybreak will only see detriments in the long run because of it.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,406
136
I wonder what the fallout will be for the founders pack people.
Thank god they released that Lion/Tasmanian devil video it made me suspicious.
 
Last edited:

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
They were pissed off well before this, since apparently Landmark has only had one important update since Columbus Nova bought SOE.
 

maniacalpha1-1

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
3,562
14
81
The key question is this:

EverQuest Next was cancelled, but is this the end for new EverQuest games? Or are they starting over at the drawing board?

EQ1 and 2 are basically just one ongoing nostalgia trip with progression servers, and a few holdouts on Live keeping the expansions flowing. They won't return to prominence without a new game. Do they even have any worthwhile games in known development?
 

Zenoth

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2005
5,202
216
106
I suppose it's mainly a question of money, as usual. But EverQuest Next looked way too ambitious. I remember that SOE Live presentation (in 2013), it sounded too good to be true. Maybe they would have pulled it off though, who knows heh (doubt it).
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
After what happened with Vanguard:SOH - yeah, I know it wasn't really a sequel to Everquest in name - this was expected. Overpromise, underdeliver.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
I suppose it's mainly a question of money, as usual. But EverQuest Next looked way too ambitious. I remember that SOE Live presentation (in 2013), it sounded too good to be true. Maybe they would have pulled it off though, who knows heh (doubt it).

I lost all trust in anything SOE well over a decade ago, myself.
 

xantub

Senior member
Feb 12, 2014
717
1
46
As an EQ1 and EQ2 former player, EQNext didn't entice me one bit. Super Mario double jump, very few skills active (with half of the few depending on the weapon you're wielding), twitch combat... nothing at all like Everquest. Basically they just made some random game and put the name Everquest on it because they owned it.
 

GoodRevrnd

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2001
6,801
581
126
Smedley was an incompetent manager who just ran his mouth. Now he is replaced with Daybreak destroying the company and trying to squeeze blood out wherever they can, rather than making serious investments into new products.
 

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
33,536
53,691
136
Played some very early beta of Camelot Unchained today, a lot of fun, older slow style combat, very raw atm though but it was fun.

/they have a pvp night on fridays
 

GoodRevrnd

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2001
6,801
581
126
I think Camelot Unchained and Crowfall are literally the last only hopes for MMOs.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
I was a huge EQ fan in the late 90's and early 2000's. It was a great universe at the time, but being realistic, it is very, very generic and derivative. EQ2 was a nice trip down nostalgia lane for me, but I don't really care what comes out with the EQ name attached anymore.

Sad to see it canceled, I would have given it a shot. RIP EQ.
 

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
33,536
53,691
136
Should we be worried City State made CUBE along side Camelot Unchained? Sounds a lot like Landmark.

I'm able to test Camelot, it will be going into beta1 testing shortly. It is still a long long way from being a playable game though...but there is steady progress
 

maniacalpha1-1

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
3,562
14
81
How is H1Z1 doing? If it's not going to be the next big, or at least stable, thing, then, what does Daybreak have to survive on now? If Pantheon were to actually reach launch, and turns out as the true EQ successor it seems to be, it could take away at least some of both the EQ Live players and some of the players who keep going back to each new Progression server.
 

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
33,536
53,691
136
How is H1Z1 doing? If it's not going to be the next big, or at least stable, thing, then, what does Daybreak have to survive on now? If Pantheon were to actually reach launch, and turns out as the true EQ successor it seems to be, it could take away at least some of both the EQ Live players and some of the players who keep going back to each new Progression server.

H1Z1 got turned into 2 separate games
 
Last edited: