Originally posted by: Aharami
cant u jsut disable ActiveX?
Originally posted by: SampSon
That's great, but I still NEED IE, period.Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: SampSon
This is true. Though never once have I ever had a problem with security and IE.Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: SampSon
Too bad no browser can compare to IE for being so full of security holes.
Edited for clarity.
😛
When someone makes a browser with 100% compatibility, I will switch again.
Firebird and now Firefox has been a gem across the board for compatibility. Even my online banking that "recommends" Internet Exploder has 0 problems with Firefox. I still use IE when testing pages that I've designed or something, but otherwise it's been my primary browser for quite some time now.
Originally posted by: rh71
I swear I'll stop using IE when there's another browser that loads just as fast initially.
*shrug*Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: SampSon
That's great, but I still NEED IE, period.Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: SampSon
This is true. Though never once have I ever had a problem with security and IE.Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: SampSon
Too bad no browser can compare to IE for being so full of security holes.
Edited for clarity.
😛
When someone makes a browser with 100% compatibility, I will switch again.
Firebird and now Firefox has been a gem across the board for compatibility. Even my online banking that "recommends" Internet Exploder has 0 problems with Firefox. I still use IE when testing pages that I've designed or something, but otherwise it's been my primary browser for quite some time now.
Sucks to be you. 😛
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
It's funny how people mock Microsoft for making products with security holes. The fact of the matter is that people who exploit these bugs and write viruses wouldn't waste their time doing this on software that's used on only 2% of the computers in the world. That's why you rarely hear about viruses specific to Macs... who would waste their time writing a virus for 2% of the world's computers, most of which are behind very secure firewalls at high tech businesses?
Good point.
And Sampson is correct also. I unfortunately still have to use IE from time to time due to incompatibility with certain pages.
Originally posted by: SampSon
That's great, but I still NEED IE, period.Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: SampSon
This is true. Though never once have I ever had a problem with security and IE.Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: SampSon
Too bad no browser can compare to IE for being so full of security holes.
Edited for clarity.
😛
When someone makes a browser with 100% compatibility, I will switch again.
Firebird and now Firefox has been a gem across the board for compatibility. Even my online banking that "recommends" Internet Exploder has 0 problems with Firefox. I still use IE when testing pages that I've designed or something, but otherwise it's been my primary browser for quite some time now.
Originally posted by: Fiveohhh
Just curious, is IE not secure cause its so widely used(therfor targeted more), or is it badly coded?
Originally posted by: Skoorb
This would be the same government that blew $100 million in unused plane tickets.
My point being IE pwns j00r ass. A lamborghini isn't as reliable as a civic for daily driving, but it's a better car. WORD!Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: Skoorb
This would be the same government that blew $100 million in unused plane tickets.
Your point being? I'm not going to debate the fact that our government has fscked up countless times, but c'mon now. How many security holes has Microsoft patched in IE? Until they get with the program (pun intended) and clean up their act, Firefox or an alternate browser is a much safer alternative.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
My point being that an unpatched copy of IE allows script kiddies to pwn j00r ass.Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: Skoorb
This would be the same government that blew $100 million in unused plane tickets.
Your point being? I'm not going to debate the fact that our government has fscked up countless times, but c'mon now. How many security holes has Microsoft patched in IE? Until they get with the program (pun intended) and clean up their act, Firefox or an alternate browser is a much safer alternative.
Originally posted by: notfred
Then why do they make us web applications that only work in IE? Damn peice of sh!t payroll software.
Originally posted by: nsafreak
Originally posted by: SampSon
Too bad no browser can compare to IE.
Except Myie2.
Can compare in what way?
The number of security holes that STILL aren't patched?
The general length of time it takes to release a fix? Microsoft stated in this article a release of a comprehensive security pack "sometime this summer". Good chance it's coming with XP SP2
The overall buginess of the program?
Or how about general non compliance with W3C standards?
Please tell us, we'd all really like to know.
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
It's funny how people mock Microsoft for making products with security holes. The fact of the matter is that people who exploit these bugs and write viruses wouldn't waste their time doing this on software that's used on only 2% of the computers in the world. That's why you rarely hear about viruses specific to Macs... who would waste their time writing a virus for 2% of the world's computers, most of which are behind very secure firewalls at high tech businesses?
Originally posted by: Armitage
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
It's funny how people mock Microsoft for making products with security holes. The fact of the matter is that people who exploit these bugs and write viruses wouldn't waste their time doing this on software that's used on only 2% of the computers in the world. That's why you rarely hear about viruses specific to Macs... who would waste their time writing a virus for 2% of the world's computers, most of which are behind very secure firewalls at high tech businesses?
I'm so tired of this lame argument.
The classic counter example is Apache ... greater market share then IIS, which should make it the bigger target according to this argument. Yet it is LESS exploited then IIS.
Just face it, IE just sucks on security.
As for the other arguments...
I don't recall the last time I came across a site that doesn't work right in Mozilla (except my companies dumbass timecard application).
Loading times? I don't find it slow, but who cares anyway? I start Mozilla once, and it stays up for weeks until I have to reboot or log off for some reason.
Add on pop-up blocking, tabbed browsing, banner blocking, etc., etc. and it's no contest.
Originally posted by: Modeps
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=74&e=3&u=/cmp/20040702/tc_cmp/22103407
The Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team touched off a storm this week when it recommended for security reasons using browsers other than Microsoft Corp.'s Internet Explorer.
:beer:
did a few searches, didnt find any.. sorry if it's a repost!
....The number of security holes that STILL aren't patched?....