Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: ColdFusion718
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Descartes
Also, I should note that I've sent probably a dozen or more bottles back in my winedrinking history. The bottles were either corked or worse. In one case I had to send an Italian Nebbiolo back to the sommelier at a trendy restaurant in Atlanta only to be told, "That's how the Italians make it." The wine was distinctinly sulfuric, and having made a few hundred gallons of wine in my time I know when sulfur makes its way into a wine, and it's never on purpose.
Same here, I've probably sent back 6 wines.
Italians are tart, but sulfuric and
crunchy is bad.
Crunchy? I didn't know wines crunched? This is wine snob talk. Btw, I've taken a few viticulture and enology classes so I know how to make wine and whatnot.
You've taken viticulture classes and you don't know about tartrates?
A lot of the BS jargon that wine-tasters use are just highfalutin talk. What happened to "this wine tastes good, I like it"?
Sufficient for dinner, but not sufficient for qualifying a wine. Anything that delves into sensory
overtures at a casual dinner is being a little pompous, but the descriptions used do have their place. There's nothing wrong with pointing out that a wine is tannic, oaked, fruity, acidic, etc.
I wanted to prove a point so in one of the classes I took years ago, I challenged a wine snob to a taste test. I gave him a few different wines to test (I made sure others were around). He went on and on about this one wine had flamboyant, rebellious character. Personally, I think he was the flamboyant one, not the wine. :evil:
Ok, never in my entire life have I heard anyone describe a wine as flamboyant and rebellious. That's florid nonsense speech, and it says very little about the wine unless he's saying that the style is rebelling against more common styles for a given region; for example, you'll sometimes find people experimenting with style. Pinot Noir in Oregon's Willamette Valley and California Carneros are primary examples.
Finally, I gave him a very cheap $5 bottle of wine to try and he said that one was the best and said how it was the same $200 bottle he had in France. You should have seen the look on his face when I said "Dude, I bought that for $5 down at the farmers market."
I'm calling shens on your entire story. In wine, you are paying for
complexity in growth, preparation and style. Additionally, there is a premium for high-demand low-supply wines like those of the Cote d'Or. No one, and I mean no one, would mistake a $200 French anything for a $5 anything else as being comparable. It has nothing to do with price.