Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Technically the firmware is illegally distributed software.
Originally posted by: VanillaH
what kind of distinction can you make between flashing to a higher grade model and overclocking? it is up to the manufacturers to include preventive measures if they find this significant to their revenue and whatnot. i mean would 'upgrading' regular pepsi to lemon twist by adding lemon juice in it be considered unethical?
as long as you dont request RMA due to failed flashing, i dont see any moral issues involed here.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Technically the firmware is illegally distributed software.
I know nothing about the situation, but if what you say is true this would be the same as buying XP Home and then installing a pirated copy of XP Pro. Do you think that's ethical?
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Technically the firmware is illegally distributed software.
I know nothing about the situation, but if what you say is true this would be the same as buying XP Home and then installing a pirated copy of XP Pro. Do you think that's ethical?
not quite the same thing. this is more like better tuning your engine that you bought and paid for. your example is more like buying a cheeseburger, asking for a cup for water, and then filling it with coke
Originally posted by: z0mb13
I thought u are talking bout flashing ur ding dong
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: z0mb13
I thought u are talking bout flashing ur ding dong
lol, me too
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
thought this would be about boobies
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
thought this would be about boobies
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Isn't the firmware openly and freely distributed by ATI themselves (as in firmware updates)?
