ethical dilemma

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Atomicus

Banned
May 20, 2004
5,192
0
0
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: Atomicus
Professors photocopy sections out of textbooks all the time without receiving consent from the authors or publishers. Use for "educational" purposes doesn't justify it, but they still do it. No ramifications whatsoever because maybe people don't care since the use is for non-profit purposes and purely for education.


rofl..how does the educational clause not justify their actions. it's an understood principle that professors can do this because the authors an dpublishers get money from the students who buy the books (or professors who buy the books). the whole purpose of that clause was for professors! Obviously, you missed the point on that one...

Ummm.... not when the professor photocopies from books that aren't required to be bought by the students taking the course. Your attempt to point out a fallacy has been shut down. Thanks.
 

shimsham

Lifer
May 9, 2002
10,765
0
0
Originally posted by: franguinho
Originally posted by: Linflas
These are in house videos that are not sold for profit? If so I really wouldn't have a problem with it.

that is so true...
it is a training video that apparently will be used on numerous occasions but will never be copied and is stored somewhere for future reference after they are done with it...

so its only 1 copy... and used strictly for educational/training purposes...

nice!! here's something i can tell my friend for peace of mind! :)



i wouldnt sweat it then. seems almost impossible to get caught unless someone alertedthe authorties about it.

wouldnt your friends company have copies of the dvds done by the previous company they hired before asking your friend to do it? that would seem to go a long way in preventing his bosses from trying to pin it on him.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
I would have done it assuming 2 things:
1. I could back up the claim that this had occured long before I arrived.
2. I had some sort of email from my boss outlining the duties and possibly my legal worries.

If I had both those things, I don't see any way it could ever come back to haunt me.
 

zerocool1

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2002
4,486
1
81
femaven.blogspot.com
Originally posted by: FoBoT
he should have played dumb, like he wasn't capable of doing it

and if you woulda been fired, he coulda said wrongful termination.
Copying DVD material is illegal under DCMA, which says circumventing a copyright protection medium does not constitute fair use.
 

Papagayo

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2003
2,303
24
81
depends on how much money they are willing to pay..

I'll gladly cap someone for a million..
 

Jzero

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
18,834
1
0
Originally posted by: spacejamz

just out of curiousity, how would this be different from the 'sampling' done on newer songs where they use 'small clips' of older songs in them?

IIRC, they don't need to get permission from the original artist because they only used a 'small portion' of the song... and in this case, the new artist is making money off the original material...if I am wrong on that, I apologize...

When you sample, you still have to pay a license fee, although you don't necessarily need explicit permission.
 

Steve

Lifer
May 2, 2004
15,945
11
81
Last summer I set up a bunch of old computers for donations, and MS gave us the green light to install and give out our old copies of Win95. Our PHB wanted any other OS on them, even offering to bring his own 98 CD. My supervisor shot that idea down.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
Does the US Navy count?
Everything we did was sanctioned by the government. Regardless of what the so-called "Law" said.
 

Krazefinn

Senior member
Feb 1, 2006
610
0
0
Getting it in writing might incriminate you further....just having someone right an order for you to do some illegal act does not absolve you of the responsibilities....and implies you KNEW the act was illegal. It in no way [protects you, esp if you knew, or should have known, act was illegal. I wouldnt reccomend this... But if they fired you for refusal....

And definitleyjust about any company would scapegoat a subordinate to save their pwnd @$$&$
 
Jun 19, 2004
10,860
1
81
He should go back to his superiors and say "Try as I might, the encryption on the material you need me to rip is unbreakable. The company you hired before must have had access to better applications. weasel out FTW!
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
Originally posted by: zerocool1
Originally posted by: FoBoT
he should have played dumb, like he wasn't capable of doing it
and if you woulda been fired, he coulda said wrongful termination.
Copying DVD material is illegal under DCMA, which says circumventing a copyright protection medium does not constitute fair use.
Which is something I still dont get.
If I have a program that looks at every single bit on a DVD, then copies it down to my hard drive exactly as it was on that DVD, THEN I copy it to a blank DVD in the exact same order (every single bit) exactly how have I circumvented any copyright protection?

 

Alex

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 1999
6,995
0
0
Originally posted by: DaiShan
Originally posted by: puffff
i'd probably do it. if anything bad came of it, im' sure the company would be the one in trouble, not me. why would the mpaa come after an individual with limited assets when they can go after a larger entity?


The OP makes it sound like his friend has the equipment at home, thus the company could start treating him as a contractor = bankruptcy for your friend OP.

true but my friend is the sysadmin at the company and just happens to edit home videos in his spare time! :) so really i think this would just be a bonus cause his original job is still valuable to the company...
 

Alex

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 1999
6,995
0
0
Originally posted by: shimsham
Originally posted by: franguinho
Originally posted by: Linflas
These are in house videos that are not sold for profit? If so I really wouldn't have a problem with it.

that is so true...
it is a training video that apparently will be used on numerous occasions but will never be copied and is stored somewhere for future reference after they are done with it...

so its only 1 copy... and used strictly for educational/training purposes...

nice!! here's something i can tell my friend for peace of mind! :)



i wouldnt sweat it then. seems almost impossible to get caught unless someone alertedthe authorties about it.

wouldnt your friends company have copies of the dvds done by the previous company they hired before asking your friend to do it? that would seem to go a long way in preventing his bosses from trying to pin it on him.

apparently there is such material and although he doesnt have access to it he was shown 2 other training DVDs so he could see what was expected...
 

Bootprint

Diamond Member
Jan 11, 2002
9,847
0
0
I've already done something that could get a large company in trouble. Changed the date on a mainframe just so we could use the OS and other software for a few more months beyond the licensing dates.
But your stuff sounds like a quite a few people would know about it, so I'd be move hesitant to do something like that.
 

Phlargo

Senior member
Jul 21, 2004
865
0
0
This is an interesting problem that attorneys have to deal with sometimes. The bar requires very specific ethical standards for attorneys and sometimes a young attorney gets bullied at a big firm by an upper level partner or something to do something clearly outside the ethical requirements of the ABA.

I know a guy who had to give up a $130k/year associateship and position at a great law firm in Philadelphia after he exposed the senior partner's transgressions to the Ethical Committee. He totally had to resign after he ratted out one of the top guys and got him severely sanctioned.

And then.. he had trouble getting work at another firm because he had lost his prestigious position with another firm and was pretty much prevented from talking about it.

It's a rough decision to make, but I can tell you - he feels much better about himself having made the right choice.
 

chambersc

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2005
6,247
0
0
Originally posted by: Atomicus
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: Atomicus
Professors photocopy sections out of textbooks all the time without receiving consent from the authors or publishers. Use for "educational" purposes doesn't justify it, but they still do it. No ramifications whatsoever because maybe people don't care since the use is for non-profit purposes and purely for education.


rofl..how does the educational clause not justify their actions. it's an understood principle that professors can do this because the authors an dpublishers get money from the students who buy the books (or professors who buy the books). the whole purpose of that clause was for professors! Obviously, you missed the point on that one...

Ummm.... not when the professor photocopies from books that aren't required to be bought by the students taking the course. Your attempt to point out a fallacy has been shut down. Thanks.


I knew you would bring up that point. Consider it stricken from my original argument. I still win. There is an "educational" clause in most/all books intended for adademic discussion.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
My view? Companies are meaningless and have no rights. Only what is right matters. Companies will ALWAYS screw workers before losing $.30 of executive profit, so never trust anything anyone ever tells you. Based on all that not only would I not participate, I would gather evidence and turn them in immediatley.

But that's just me. :cool:
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
I don't think it's illegal to use a brief scene of a movie. I think it falls under fair use.
 

speg

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2000
3,681
3
76
www.speg.com
There's no problem doing that, so he took some clips for a training video. I've used clips in presentations at school before... Non - issue.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
There's no way he would face legal problems from this. And i would... because it would let me keep my job... but also i could potentially use it as blackmail further down the road.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Yeah, I don't even think that's necessarily illegal if they're only using short clips.