Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: Atomicus
Professors photocopy sections out of textbooks all the time without receiving consent from the authors or publishers. Use for "educational" purposes doesn't justify it, but they still do it. No ramifications whatsoever because maybe people don't care since the use is for non-profit purposes and purely for education.
rofl..how does the educational clause not justify their actions. it's an understood principle that professors can do this because the authors an dpublishers get money from the students who buy the books (or professors who buy the books). the whole purpose of that clause was for professors! Obviously, you missed the point on that one...
Ummm.... not when the professor photocopies from books that aren't required to be bought by the students taking the course. Your attempt to point out a fallacy has been shut down. Thanks.