Ethernet card vs WiFi power consumption?

[Knocks]

Just ordered an Intel NUC (Haswell i5), which did not come with a WiFi card. I plan to do a lot of local streaming of high-bitrate 1080p content and just found an old 40-foot Ethernet cable lying around (saved from the college dorm days!), so I'm thinking about saving $40 and skipping WiFi altogether.

Will the NUC theoretically be staying a little cooler because it'll be using an integrated network card versus an add-on WiFi? I'm thinking at the very least there will be more ventilation because the SATA slot will be unobstructed, so more air can move around, but has anyone ever run a benchmark on power consumption of wired vs wireless networking?

 

[John Connor]

I wouldn't think that there would be much in comparison to power consumption with a WIFI card and a NIC. Even heat is very, very negligible.

Doesn't your NUC have a NIC built into the motherboard?

**EDIT- It does. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16856102035

BTW, most of your heat will come from RAM and the CPU.

 

[azazel1024]

These days integrated gigabit NICs typically consume around .6-1w active. A wifi card is going to typically use somewhat less power than that. All up maybe .3-.8w.

Negligible difference. You however will have a lot more throughput with wired and don't have to worry about pesky things like wireless interference or loading up your WLAN.

Always wire when you have the choice.

 

[JackMDS]

It is like thinking that emptying the ashtray in a car will make it faster.

 

[Knocks]

These days integrated gigabit NICs typically consume around .6-1w active. A wifi card is going to typically use somewhat less power than that. All up maybe .3-.8w.

Negligible difference. You however will have a lot more throughput with wired and don't have to worry about pesky things like wireless interference or loading up your WLAN.

Always wire when you have the choice.

Very helpful, thanks! Do you mind telling where you're getting the wattage measurements from?

 

[Red Squirrel]

The wifi has to transmit RF, so that probably uses a bit more power than transmitting over wire. Probably a couple watts or so for the transmitter. I don't imagine it would be very high.

 

[JackMDS]

WiFI Client cards transmit an average of 40mW.

 

[azazel1024]

Very helpful, thanks! Do you mind telling where you're getting the wattage measurements from?

A variety of different technical specs for different gigabit chipsets and wifi chipsets that I have looked at.

For the 40mw, keep in mind that is RADIO power only, not actually the power consumed by the entire wifi chipset, amps, etc, etc. Radio is only one part of it.

Same thing with a LAN NIC. The actual Tx component is only sending a few dozen mw over the wire, but the chipset consumes a resonable amount of power.

Also, these are for integrated NICs/Wifi cards. Seperate ones consume more power (but also tend to have more powerful options, though not always).

For example, IIRC Intels current latest integrated gigabit NICs run in the half watt range or so, but the seperate PCI-e NICs run more in the 1-1.2w range or something like that.