• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

England to Relax Marijuana Laws

That's a good first step, but they should fully legaliza MJ.


<-- Has never smokes, but hopes Ottawa will legalize MJ soon.
 
Originally posted by: SWirth86
I'm too lazy to sign up for the NY Times.....can you just post it here?

Britain to Relax Marijuana Laws
By WARREN HOGE


ONDON, July 10 ? Britain said today that it would relax its laws on marijuana smoking, keeping the use of the drug theoretically illegal but no longer arresting people using it in discreet amounts in private.

At the same time, Britain said it would increase the punishment for marijuana dealing and promised stepped-up drug education and more treatment for abusers. An estimated five million people in Britain regularly use marijuana, and government data show its use has risen sharply over the last 20 years.

The decision, announced by Home Secretary David Blunkett in the House of Commons, provoked criticism from the opposition Conservative Party, and it prompted the resignation of a Labor government official who previously headed Britain's fight against drugs.

The government action followed recommendations of a parliamentary committee that in May said a more-tolerant drug policy would gain greater credibility among young people and help the police direct their resources towards cracking down on heroin and cocaine. Britain has the most drug-related deaths of any country in the European Union, with heroin cited as the principal cause.

The parliamentary committee also suggested relaxing law enforcement involving the dance-club drug ecstacy, but Mr. Blunkett said he had rejected that advice.

The reclassification of marijuana puts it on a legal par with antidepressants and steroids. Possession of the drug would not necessarily be considered an offense subject to arrest. Though the new policy will not be official for a year, any police action from now on will be limited to issuing a warning and seizing the marijuana.

Mr. Blunkett countered suggestions that Britain was going "soft on drugs" by saying police would retain the right to arrest users in "aggravated" cases, like smoking outside schools or in the presence of children. The Home Office emphasized that marijuana cafes where the drug is sold and used openly remained illegal and would be closed down by police.

"It is critical that police can maintain public order," Mr. Blunkett said. "Where cannabis possession is linked to aggravated behavior that threatens public order, the police will retain the power of arrest."

Scotland Yard said it welcomed the reclassification of marijuana combined with the maintaining of discretionary police power to make some arrests. "The retention of police power of arrest will enable the police to have greater flexibility in dealing with incidents on the street," said Andy Hayman, a spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers.

Mr. Blunkett insisted that today's move did not constitute legalization of marijuana. "All controlled drugs are harmful and will remain illegal," he said. "We must concentrate our efforts on the drugs that cause the most harm, while sending a credible message to young people."

But Keith Hellawell, an adviser to Prime Minister Tony Blair's government who had served as the chief of Britain's drug war, said the new policy "would virtually be decriminalization of cannabis, and this is, quite frankly, giving out the wrong message."

He coupled his resignation announcement with a strong attack on the policy, saying it would damage communities and lead to more, not less, drug use.

"It's actually a technical adjustment, which in the reality of the law doesn't make a great deal of difference," he said, "but it's being bandied about by people as a softening of the law."

Mr. Hellawell said that there had been an increase in marijuana smoking among young people and that more people were seeking treatment for its effects. "Why on earth, when there are these problems, we change our message and give a softer message, I don't know," he said.

The former chief constable of West Yorkshire, Mr. Hellawell had been named the government's first antidrug coordinator or drug czar as the job was widely known, by Mr. Blair in 1997. But last year he was sidelined by Mr. Blunkett from the $160,000 post to part-time adviser on international drug trade control.

The new police tolerance of marijuana has been in effect on an experimental basis in two London neighborhoods, Lambeth and Brixton. The Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith visited the Brixton project on Tuesday and told the House of Commons today that residents had told him that the marijuana policy had led to rampant dealing on their streets. He said Mr. Blunkett's plan amounted to "handing over drugs policy to criminals on the street."

Oliver Letwin, the Conservatives' spokesman on law enforcement, complained that "the middle ground of calling it illegal ? leaving it in the hands of dealers rather than in legitimate tobacconists or whatever, then turning a blind eye to it ? is the worst of all worlds."

Kate Hoey, a Labor Party member of Parliament who represents one of the affected London areas, said the government could live to regret today's decision because of the increasing strength of marijuana being peddled on the street.

"It is a very strong type of cannabis, it's genetically modified, it is not perhaps like people tried 20 years ago," she said. "And we have no idea of the long-term effects of constant hard smoking that some kids are doing now."
 
i am very glad about this, canada has a big meeting this august to determine if it should indeed decriminilize weed and i hope they do. kids and people alike dont need their life ruined (not being able to get a job) because of a simple joint possesion. pc leader joe clark is all for decrimilzation and i hope to god it happens. the best step is to give a fine like a traffic ticket for small amounts (less than 1 oz.) than to put someone in jail.
if britian can do it, canada can but the only reason canada hasnt is because of USA government. US doesnt want to see canada decrimilize because that means the WAR ON DRUGS in the US has failied and they wont let that happen. its time for canada to step up and not be bullyed by the US. its our country and we should do what ever the hell we want.
 
England to Relax Marijuana Laws
It's sort of a self-fulfilling prophesy, isn't it? If you get enough pot going in one place, they probably couldn't do anything but relax.
rolleye.gif
😉
 
Excellent. The tide is slowly turning. The propaganda fed to the world by the US Goverment ('Reefer Madness' anyone?) is becoming more and more tranparent to free thinking folk of this world. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: FrancesBeansRevenge
Excellent. The tide is slowly turning. The propaganda fed to the world by the US Goverment ('Reefer Madness' anyone?) is becoming more and more tranparent to free thinking folk of this world. 🙂

right on 🙂

<---- just quit but still believes in the cause
 
I think MJ should be legalized. I don't think it should be sold at the local 7-11, but I don't think people should go to jail for possessing a joint, or small personal amount, nor having 1 or 2 SMALL plants for their own personal use. Of course, policing it would be impossible, and there is always going to be someone abusing it, and it is just easier to just make everything illegal. If you can buy cigarettes and kill yourself, or go into the military and die for your country, you should be able to smoke a joint to ease back pain and pain from cancer treatments (among other ailments)
 
Back
Top