I've read Neutral Coasting is bad, illegal, unsafe... and that it doesn't save you gas. I agree that it is unsafe, but does it really not save any gas? I've also read that Engine Braking doesn't have an effect on gas mileage. I'll be testing both theories to try and give people some concrete data.
The car I used for the tests is my 2003 Toyota Corolla S. The gas mileage was attained by dividing the mileage at the point the gas light comes on by ten gallons. Whenever I fill up the car when the light comes on, I only fill up about ten. It's not a perfect system, but the results should be within the ballpark. As far as driving conditions go: I've been driving through many different conditions every day before these test and I always used to get similar gas mileage.
My normal driving habits:
City Acceleration <= 3000 rpm
City Cruise <= 2000 rpm
Highway Acceleration <= 3000 rpm, sometimes, though, I go all the way to 6000 rpm for fun
Highway Cruise <= 3000 rpm
Engine braking <= 2000 rpm
Driving with these limits I get 28.5 mpg. This will be the reference gas mileage.
Neutral Coasting + low rpm acceleration driving habits:
City Acceleration <= 2000 rpm
City Cruise <= 2000 rpm
Highway Acceleration <= 3000 rpm
Highway Cruise <= 3000 rpm
Engine Braking = 0
Driving with these limits I get 35 mpg. That's a 23% increase over the reference. Bascially, if I'm not accelerating, the car is in neutral. It saves a lot of gas, but it requires a lot of shifting and takes the fun out of driving; as well as being less safe.
High rpm engine braking driving habits:
City Accleration <= 3000 rpm
City Cruise = 1600 - 2600 rpm, (arbitrary number that previously had importance, but no longer)
Highway Acceleration <= 3000 rpm, sometimes though I go all the way to 6000 rpm for fun
Highway Acceleration <= 3000 rpm
Engine Braking <= 3000 rpm, and sometimes at <= 4000 rpm
Driving with these limits I get 27.5 mpg. That's a 3.5% decrease in gas mileage over the reference. However, it's probably attributed more to the city cruise rpms being higher than in my normal driving habits. So, engine braking uses negligible gas, if any.
The car I used for the tests is my 2003 Toyota Corolla S. The gas mileage was attained by dividing the mileage at the point the gas light comes on by ten gallons. Whenever I fill up the car when the light comes on, I only fill up about ten. It's not a perfect system, but the results should be within the ballpark. As far as driving conditions go: I've been driving through many different conditions every day before these test and I always used to get similar gas mileage.
My normal driving habits:
City Acceleration <= 3000 rpm
City Cruise <= 2000 rpm
Highway Acceleration <= 3000 rpm, sometimes, though, I go all the way to 6000 rpm for fun
Highway Cruise <= 3000 rpm
Engine braking <= 2000 rpm
Driving with these limits I get 28.5 mpg. This will be the reference gas mileage.
Neutral Coasting + low rpm acceleration driving habits:
City Acceleration <= 2000 rpm
City Cruise <= 2000 rpm
Highway Acceleration <= 3000 rpm
Highway Cruise <= 3000 rpm
Engine Braking = 0
Driving with these limits I get 35 mpg. That's a 23% increase over the reference. Bascially, if I'm not accelerating, the car is in neutral. It saves a lot of gas, but it requires a lot of shifting and takes the fun out of driving; as well as being less safe.
High rpm engine braking driving habits:
City Accleration <= 3000 rpm
City Cruise = 1600 - 2600 rpm, (arbitrary number that previously had importance, but no longer)
Highway Acceleration <= 3000 rpm, sometimes though I go all the way to 6000 rpm for fun
Highway Acceleration <= 3000 rpm
Engine Braking <= 3000 rpm, and sometimes at <= 4000 rpm
Driving with these limits I get 27.5 mpg. That's a 3.5% decrease in gas mileage over the reference. However, it's probably attributed more to the city cruise rpms being higher than in my normal driving habits. So, engine braking uses negligible gas, if any.