Emma Watson: I'd Go Naked

[TallBill]

Originally posted by: Gibson486

Since when is it elitist to not watch Harry Potter?

3:26 CST, 12/10/2008

 

[dougp]

Originally posted by: montypythizzle
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP

You've been crit by wall of FAP.

You are blind.

 

[Gibson486]

Originally posted by: TallBill

Originally posted by: Gibson486

Since when is it elitist to not watch Harry Potter?

3:26 CST, 12/10/2008

so I am elitist for not watching a movie? I am confused....

 

[MichaelD]

18...legal. Is it wrong to want her being that she's less than half my age? 😛 That's the nice thing about jailbait...I keep get older but they stay the same age. (I know, technically not jailbait but in my case I think the idiom applies. 😛)

 

[SirStev0]

Originally posted by: TallBill

Originally posted by: SirStev0

They are just being elitist. Anyone not in a box for the past 7 years knows would at least somewhat recognize her.

Or telling the truth. I didn't recognize her until I read that she was a Harry Potter star. I saw about 30 minutes of the first movie and had no interest in the story.

You still did recognize her. And that is my point. It was the first line of the article. They just posted they don't know who she is.. so either they didn't read the article and posted anyway or they do know who she is...

either way their post was just a "This topic is below me and you all should know it" response.

 

[KeithTalent]

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: TallBill

Originally posted by: SirStev0

They are just being elitist. Anyone not in a box for the past 7 years knows would at least somewhat recognize her.

Or telling the truth. I didn't recognize her until I read that she was a Harry Potter star. I saw about 30 minutes of the first movie and had no interest in the story.

You still did recognize her. And that is my point. It was the first line of the article. They just posted they don't know who she is.. so either they didn't read the article and posted anyway or they do know who she is...

either way their post was just a "This topic is below me and you all should know it" response.

I wish "naked *insert random good looking females here*" were below me. 😛

KT

 

[darkxshade]

Originally posted by: KeithTalent

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: TallBill

Originally posted by: SirStev0

They are just being elitist. Anyone not in a box for the past 7 years knows would at least somewhat recognize her.

Or telling the truth. I didn't recognize her until I read that she was a Harry Potter star. I saw about 30 minutes of the first movie and had no interest in the story.

You still did recognize her. And that is my point. It was the first line of the article. They just posted they don't know who she is.. so either they didn't read the article and posted anyway or they do know who she is...

either way their post was just a "This topic is below me and you all should know it" response.

I wish "naked *insert random good looking females here*" would below me. 😛

KT

😉

 

[SirStev0]

Originally posted by: KeithTalent

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: TallBill

Originally posted by: SirStev0

They are just being elitist. Anyone not in a box for the past 7 years knows would at least somewhat recognize her.

Or telling the truth. I didn't recognize her until I read that she was a Harry Potter star. I saw about 30 minutes of the first movie and had no interest in the story.

You still did recognize her. And that is my point. It was the first line of the article. They just posted they don't know who she is.. so either they didn't read the article and posted anyway or they do know who she is...

either way their post was just a "This topic is below me and you all should know it" response.

I wish "naked *insert random good looking females here*" were below me. 😛

KT

well played sir. my hat is off to you.

 

[TallBill]

Originally posted by: dreadpiratedoug

Originally posted by: montypythizzle
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP

You've been crit by wall of FAP.

You are blind.

*Hits F1 to consume "naked grandparents" potion that is in slot 1 of my belt*

I'm safe for now.

 

[SirStev0]

Originally posted by: darkxshade

Originally posted by: KeithTalent

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: TallBill

Originally posted by: SirStev0

They are just being elitist. Anyone not in a box for the past 7 years knows would at least somewhat recognize her.

Or telling the truth. I didn't recognize her until I read that she was a Harry Potter star. I saw about 30 minutes of the first movie and had no interest in the story.

You still did recognize her. And that is my point. It was the first line of the article. They just posted they don't know who she is.. so either they didn't read the article and posted anyway or they do know who she is...

either way their post was just a "This topic is below me and you all should know it" response.

I wish "naked *insert random good looking females here*" would below me. 😛

KT

😉

KT you must be mario.. cause you just got 1up'ed

 

[KeithTalent]

Originally posted by: darkxshade

Originally posted by: KeithTalent

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: TallBill

Originally posted by: SirStev0

They are just being elitist. Anyone not in a box for the past 7 years knows would at least somewhat recognize her.

Or telling the truth. I didn't recognize her until I read that she was a Harry Potter star. I saw about 30 minutes of the first movie and had no interest in the story.

You still did recognize her. And that is my point. It was the first line of the article. They just posted they don't know who she is.. so either they didn't read the article and posted anyway or they do know who she is...

either way their post was just a "This topic is below me and you all should know it" response.

I wish "naked *insert random good looking females here*" would below me. 😛

KT

😉

:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

KT

 

[Baked]

I've already seen enough of her boobies in that SNL episode. But naked's good, especially when the chick's doing it early like Anne Hathaway, rather than late like Kathy Bates.

 

[WaTaGuMp]

Originally posted by: darkxshade
Is she filming Hairy Potter?

She probably has a hairy potter. :evil:

 

[SirStev0]

Originally posted by: Baked
I've already seen enough of her boobies in that SNL episode. But naked's good, especially when the chick's doing it early like Anne Hathaway, rather than late like Kathy Bates.

You are going to have to elaborate.... maybe with linkage? (pm'ed of course).

 

[Atomic Playboy]

Originally posted by: Baked
I've already seen enough of her boobies in that SNL episode. But naked's good, especially when the chick's doing it early like Anne Hathaway, rather than late like Kathy Bates.

The main difference being that no one EVER wanted to see Kathy Bates naked, young or old.

 

[DVad3r]

Originally posted by: montypythizzle
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
FAPFAPFAPFAPFAP

ughhh I just spewed my load that I have been saving for 2 weeks.

 

[Baked]

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: Baked
I've already seen enough of her boobies in that SNL episode. But naked's good, especially when the chick's doing it early like Anne Hathaway, rather than late like Kathy Bates.

You are going to have to elaborate.... maybe with linkage? (pm'ed of course).

Havoc.

 

[M0oG0oGaiPan]

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: darkxshade

Originally posted by: KeithTalent

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: TallBill

Originally posted by: SirStev0

They are just being elitist. Anyone not in a box for the past 7 years knows would at least somewhat recognize her.

Or telling the truth. I didn't recognize her until I read that she was a Harry Potter star. I saw about 30 minutes of the first movie and had no interest in the story.

You still did recognize her. And that is my point. It was the first line of the article. They just posted they don't know who she is.. so either they didn't read the article and posted anyway or they do know who she is...

either way their post was just a "This topic is below me and you all should know it" response.

I wish "naked *insert random good looking females here*" would below me. 😛

KT

😉

KT you must be mario.. cause you just got 1up'ed

http://xkcd.com/151/

 

[SirStev0]

Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy

Originally posted by: Baked
I've already seen enough of her boobies in that SNL episode. But naked's good, especially when the chick's doing it early like Anne Hathaway, rather than late like Kathy Bates.

The main difference being that no one EVER wanted to see Kathy Bates naked, young or old.

not true.

 

[SunnyD]

I'd happily put on my robe and wizard hat while she takes it off...

 

[MaxDepth]

Let's put it this way, if she invests her money from the Harry Potter films pretty conservatively (sound as a pound and all that), she'll never want for money ever again.

Money = freedom to do whatever the hell you want. So, when she's 21, 25, 30, whenever, she could find a flim or photographer to do a very tasteful film or photoshoot. She doesn't seem to be a media whore, but that could be because she is getting attention wherever she goes right now. Let's see 10 years down the road to see if she craves attention like a junkie.

So yeah she can say such things now and get the fanboys all riled up.

 

[GagHalfrunt]

There's a big difference between saying you'll do it and actually doing it. A lot of actresses have said they would "for the right role" and a lot of them still have not found the role.

 

[Atomic Playboy]

Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
There's a big difference between saying you'll do it and actually doing it. A lot of actresses have said they would "for the right role" and a lot of them still have not found the role.

I've got the perfect role for her. And by role, I mean my penis.

 

[BlackTigers]

Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy

Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
There's a big difference between saying you'll do it and actually doing it. A lot of actresses have said they would "for the right role" and a lot of them still have not found the role.

I've got the perfect role for her. And by role, I mean my penis.

haha i just actually laughed.

nicely done.

 

[Baked]

Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy

Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
There's a big difference between saying you'll do it and actually doing it. A lot of actresses have said they would "for the right role" and a lot of them still have not found the role.

I've got the perfect pole for her. And by pole, I mean my penis.

Fixed.